• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开单检验的原因与异常检验结果频次的关系。

Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results.

机构信息

Maastricht University, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Department of General Practice, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.3109/02813430903281758.

DOI:10.3109/02813430903281758
PMID:20121652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440609/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Laboratory tests are ordered on a daily basis, even though disease probability is often very low. Abnormal results, especially mildly abnormal results, can be difficult to interpret in these circumstances. Further insights into the occurrence of abnormalities can help improve rational test ordering and test interpretation. The objective was therefore to examine the frequency of mildly and markedly abnormal results and their relationship with physicians' reasons for ordering tests.

DESIGN

Prospective study. Participants. A total of 87 primary care physicians in the Netherlands collected data on 1775 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The physicians recorded the reason for ordering the tests, the most probable diagnosis and the pretest probability. The laboratories' reference values and specified "action limits" were used to assess the number of abnormal results and markedly abnormal results, respectively.

RESULTS

Laboratory results were received for 1621 patients and 15,603 tests were reported (mean 9.6). The proportion of abnormal test results increased with increasing pretest probability (from 13.9% to 34.7%) and was 13.4% for tests ordered to reassure the patient and 13.3% for psychosocial diagnoses. The proportion of patients with at least one abnormal test result was high: 53.1% for tests ordered to reassure and 57.7% in patients with low pretest probability. Corresponding values for a marked abnormality were 11.1% and 12.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal laboratory test results were frequent, even when pretest probability was low. Physicians should therefore carefully consider when tests are necessary. Future research could explore physicians' interpretation of test results and its impact on diagnosis and management.

摘要

目的

尽管疾病的概率通常很低,但实验室检测每天都在进行。在这种情况下,解释轻度异常和明显异常的结果可能具有挑战性。进一步了解异常情况的发生可以帮助改善合理的检测顺序和检测解释。因此,本研究旨在检查轻度和明显异常结果的频率及其与医生检测原因的关系。

设计

前瞻性研究。参与者:荷兰共有 87 名初级保健医生收集了 1775 名患者的数据。

主要观察指标

医生记录了检测的原因、最可能的诊断和检测前的概率。实验室的参考值和指定的“行动限制”用于评估异常结果和明显异常结果的数量。

结果

收到了 1621 名患者的实验室结果和 15603 项检测报告(平均 9.6 项)。异常检测结果的比例随着检测前概率的增加而增加(从 13.9%增加到 34.7%),用于安抚患者的检测的异常率为 13.4%,用于心理社会诊断的检测的异常率为 13.3%。至少有一项异常检测结果的患者比例很高:用于安抚患者的检测的异常率为 53.1%,检测前概率低的患者的异常率为 57.7%。相应的明显异常的比例分别为 11.1%和 12.4%。

结论

即使检测前的概率很低,异常的实验室检测结果也很常见。因此,医生应仔细考虑何时需要进行检测。未来的研究可以探索医生对检测结果的解释及其对诊断和管理的影响。

相似文献

1
Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results.开单检验的原因与异常检验结果频次的关系。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.3109/02813430903281758.
2
Pretest expectations strongly influence interpretation of abnormal laboratory results and further management.检验前的预期强烈影响对异常实验室结果的解读和进一步的管理。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Feb 16;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-13.
3
Cascade effects of laboratory testing are found to be rare in low disease probability situations: prospective cohort study.实验室检测的级联效应在低疾病概率情况下很少发生:前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
4
Mean Abnormal Result Rate: Proof of Concept of a New Metric for Benchmarking Selectivity in Laboratory Test Ordering.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Apr;145(4):568-73. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw041. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Cost consequences of implementing an electronic decision support system for ordering laboratory tests in primary care: evidence from a controlled prospective study in the Netherlands.在初级保健中实施实验室检查电子决策支持系统的成本后果:来自荷兰一项对照前瞻性研究的证据。
Clin Chem. 2007 Feb;53(2):213-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.073908. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
6
Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial.基于实践的策略对基层医疗医生检查单开具行为的影响:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2407-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2407.
7
Primary care physicians' challenges in ordering clinical laboratory tests and interpreting results.基层医疗医生在开具临床实验室检验医嘱和解读检验结果方面面临的挑战。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):268-74. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130104.
8
Test ordering by GP trainees: Effects of an educational intervention on attitudes and intended practice.全科医学培训学员的检查项目开具:一项教育干预对态度和预期行为的影响
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Sep;62(9):733-41.
9
Patients' anxiety and expectations: how they influence family physicians' decisions to order cancer screening tests.患者的焦虑与期望:它们如何影响家庭医生开具癌症筛查检查的决定。
Can Fam Physician. 2005 Dec;51(12):1658-9.
10
Reasons for ordering spinal x-ray investigations: how they influence general practitioners' management.安排脊柱X光检查的原因:它们如何影响全科医生的诊疗
Can Fam Physician. 2006 Oct;52(10):1266-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-Purposing the Ordering of Routine Laboratory Tests in Hospitalized Medical Patients (RePORT): protocol for a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle to reduce laboratory test over-utilization.重新规划住院医疗患者常规实验室检查的顺序(RePORT):一项多中心阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的方案,旨在评估减少实验室检查过度使用的多组分干预措施包的影响。
Implement Sci. 2024 Jul 2;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6.
2
Targeting repetitive laboratory testing with electronic health records-embedded predictive decision support: A pre-implementation study.利用电子健康记录嵌入式预测决策支持来减少重复实验室检测:一项实施前研究。
Clin Biochem. 2023 Mar;113:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
3
Why Test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) to explore the reasons for primary care testing.为何进行检测研究方案:一项全英国范围的审计,利用初级保健学术合作组织(PACT)来探究初级保健检测的原因。
BJGP Open. 2022 Sep 28;6(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017. Print 2022 Sep.
4
Molecular Biomarkers for Melanoma Screening, Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current State and Future Prospects.黑色素瘤筛查、诊断和预后的分子生物标志物:现状与未来展望
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 16;8:642380. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.642380. eCollection 2021.
5
Learning from Each Other: A Multisite Collaborative to Reduce Electrolyte Testing.相互学习:一项减少电解质检测的多中心协作项目
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Oct 26;5(6):e351. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000351. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
6
The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.基于查询的和定向的健康信息交换在初级保健实践中的互补性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz134.
7
A multi-level strategy for a long lasting reduction in unnecessary laboratory testing: A multicenter before and after study in a teaching hospital network.一项长期减少不必要实验室检测的多层次策略:教学医院网络中的多中心前后对照研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Oct 19;73(3):e13286. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13286.
8
Paging the eCardiologist: insights into referral behaviour of primary care physicians from qualitative analysis of a cardiology eConsult service.呼叫电子心脏病专家:通过对心脏病学电子会诊服务的定性分析洞察初级保健医生的转诊行为
Digit Health. 2018 Sep 2;4:2055207618792140. doi: 10.1177/2055207618792140. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
9
'I'm fishing really'--inflammatory marker testing in primary care: a qualitative study.“我真的在钓鱼”——基层医疗中的炎症标志物检测:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Mar;66(644):e200-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683857. Epub 2016 Feb 7.
10
Long-term follow-up of patients with elevated serum calcium concentrations in Swedish primary care.瑞典初级保健中血清钙浓度升高患者的长期随访。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec;31(4):248-54. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.861152.

本文引用的文献

1
The additional value of routine electrocardiograms in cardiovascular risk management of older people.常规心电图在老年人心血管风险管理中的附加价值。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(3):147-53. doi: 10.1080/02813430802095812.
2
The diagnostic challenges presented by patients with medically unexplained symptoms in general practice.全科医疗中患有医学上无法解释症状的患者所带来的诊断挑战。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(2):99-105. doi: 10.1080/02813430802048662.
3
Interpretation of laboratory results: the reference intervals, a necessary evil?实验室结果的解读:参考区间,必要之恶?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(8):939-41. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.272.
4
General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain.全科医生对背痛X线平片放射学报告的看法。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Mar;25(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430600973459.
5
Why do patients want to have their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice.患者为何希望进行血液检测?一项关于全科医疗中患者期望的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Dec 13;7:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-75.
6
A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates.一项关于描述检验准确性方法的随机试验:对医生检验后概率估计的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):184-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00004.
7
Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial.基于实践的策略对基层医疗医生检查单开具行为的影响:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2407-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2407.
8
Prevalence of transaminase abnormalities in asymptomatic, healthy subjects participating in an executive health-screening program.
Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Apr;48(4):797-801. doi: 10.1023/a:1022809430756.
9
Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice.理解诊断不确定性中的实验室检测:一项全科医疗的定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Dec;52(485):974-80.
10
Cascade effects of medical technology.医疗技术的级联效应。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:23-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.092101.134534. Epub 2001 Oct 25.