Suppr超能文献

开单检验的原因与异常检验结果频次的关系。

Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results.

机构信息

Maastricht University, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Department of General Practice, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.3109/02813430903281758.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Laboratory tests are ordered on a daily basis, even though disease probability is often very low. Abnormal results, especially mildly abnormal results, can be difficult to interpret in these circumstances. Further insights into the occurrence of abnormalities can help improve rational test ordering and test interpretation. The objective was therefore to examine the frequency of mildly and markedly abnormal results and their relationship with physicians' reasons for ordering tests.

DESIGN

Prospective study. Participants. A total of 87 primary care physicians in the Netherlands collected data on 1775 patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The physicians recorded the reason for ordering the tests, the most probable diagnosis and the pretest probability. The laboratories' reference values and specified "action limits" were used to assess the number of abnormal results and markedly abnormal results, respectively.

RESULTS

Laboratory results were received for 1621 patients and 15,603 tests were reported (mean 9.6). The proportion of abnormal test results increased with increasing pretest probability (from 13.9% to 34.7%) and was 13.4% for tests ordered to reassure the patient and 13.3% for psychosocial diagnoses. The proportion of patients with at least one abnormal test result was high: 53.1% for tests ordered to reassure and 57.7% in patients with low pretest probability. Corresponding values for a marked abnormality were 11.1% and 12.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal laboratory test results were frequent, even when pretest probability was low. Physicians should therefore carefully consider when tests are necessary. Future research could explore physicians' interpretation of test results and its impact on diagnosis and management.

摘要

目的

尽管疾病的概率通常很低,但实验室检测每天都在进行。在这种情况下,解释轻度异常和明显异常的结果可能具有挑战性。进一步了解异常情况的发生可以帮助改善合理的检测顺序和检测解释。因此,本研究旨在检查轻度和明显异常结果的频率及其与医生检测原因的关系。

设计

前瞻性研究。参与者:荷兰共有 87 名初级保健医生收集了 1775 名患者的数据。

主要观察指标

医生记录了检测的原因、最可能的诊断和检测前的概率。实验室的参考值和指定的“行动限制”用于评估异常结果和明显异常结果的数量。

结果

收到了 1621 名患者的实验室结果和 15603 项检测报告(平均 9.6 项)。异常检测结果的比例随着检测前概率的增加而增加(从 13.9%增加到 34.7%),用于安抚患者的检测的异常率为 13.4%,用于心理社会诊断的检测的异常率为 13.3%。至少有一项异常检测结果的患者比例很高:用于安抚患者的检测的异常率为 53.1%,检测前概率低的患者的异常率为 57.7%。相应的明显异常的比例分别为 11.1%和 12.4%。

结论

即使检测前的概率很低,异常的实验室检测结果也很常见。因此,医生应仔细考虑何时需要进行检测。未来的研究可以探索医生对检测结果的解释及其对诊断和管理的影响。

相似文献

4
Mean Abnormal Result Rate: Proof of Concept of a New Metric for Benchmarking Selectivity in Laboratory Test Ordering.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Apr;145(4):568-73. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw041. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

5
Learning from Each Other: A Multisite Collaborative to Reduce Electrolyte Testing.相互学习:一项减少电解质检测的多中心协作项目
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Oct 26;5(6):e351. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000351. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

10
Cascade effects of medical technology.医疗技术的级联效应。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:23-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.092101.134534. Epub 2001 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验