BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Feb 2;11:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-23.
Epidemiological studies have identified important causal and prognostic factors for back pain, but these frequently only identify a proportion of the variance, and new factors add little to these models. Recently, interest has increased in studying diseases over the life course, stimulated by the 1997 book by Kuh and Ben-Shlomo, a move accompanied by important conceptual and methodological developments. This has resulted in improvements in the understanding of other conditions like cardiovascular and respiratory disease. This paper aims to examine how conceptual frameworks from life course epidemiology could enhance back pain research.
Life course concepts can be divided into three categories. Concept 1: patterns over time, risk chains and accumulation. Simple 'chains of risk' have been studied - e.g. depression leading to back pain - but studies involving more risk factors in the chain are infrequent. Also, we have not examined how risk accumulation influences outcome, e.g. whether multiple episodes or duration of depression, throughout the life course, better predicts back pain. One-year back pain trajectories have been described, and show advantages for studying back pain, but there are few descriptions of longer-term patterns with associated transitions and turning points. Concept 2: influences and determinants of pathways. Analyses in back pain studies commonly adjust associations for potential confounders, but specific analysis of factors modifying risk, or related to the resilience or susceptibility to back pain, are rarely studied. Concept 3: timing of risk. Studies of critical or sensitive periods - crucial times of life which influence health later in life - are scarce in back pain research. Such analyses could help identify factors that influence the experience of pain throughout the life course.
Back pain researchers could usefully develop hypotheses and models of how risks from different stages of life might interact and influence the onset, persistence and prognosis of back pain throughout the life course. Adoption of concepts and methods from life course epidemiology could facilitate this.
流行病学研究已经确定了腰痛的重要因果和预后因素,但这些因素通常只能解释一部分变异,而新的因素对这些模型的贡献不大。最近,人们对研究生命过程中的疾病产生了兴趣,这一兴趣受到了 Kuh 和 Ben-Shlomo 1997 年出版的一本书的推动,这一举措伴随着重要的概念和方法上的发展。这导致了对其他疾病(如心血管和呼吸道疾病)的理解的提高。本文旨在探讨生命过程流行病学的概念框架如何增强腰痛研究。
生命过程的概念可以分为三类。概念 1:随时间变化的模式、风险链和积累。已经研究了简单的“风险链”,例如抑郁导致腰痛,但涉及链中更多风险因素的研究很少。此外,我们还没有研究风险积累如何影响结果,例如,在整个生命过程中,多次发作或抑郁持续时间是否更好地预测腰痛。已经描述了一年腰痛的轨迹,这对于研究腰痛有优势,但很少有描述与相关过渡和转折点相关的长期模式。概念 2:途径的影响和决定因素。腰痛研究中的分析通常会调整潜在混杂因素的关联,但很少对改变风险的因素或与腰痛的韧性或易感性相关的因素进行具体分析。概念 3:风险的时机。生命关键期或生命中影响后期健康的关键时期的研究在腰痛研究中很少见。这种分析可以帮助确定影响整个生命过程中疼痛体验的因素。
腰痛研究人员可以有用地开发假设和模型,说明生命不同阶段的风险如何相互作用,并影响腰痛在整个生命过程中的发生、持续和预后。采用生命过程流行病学的概念和方法可以促进这一点。