Health Informatics Research Group, Faculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Caprivistr 30A, D-49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Feb 2;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-8.
IT adoption is a process that is influenced by different external and internal factors. This study aimed1. to identify similarities and differences in the prevalence of medical and nursing IT systems in Austrian and German hospitals, and2. to match these findings with characteristics of the two countries, in particular their healthcare system, and with features of the hospitals.
In 2007, all acute care hospitals in both countries received questionnaires with identical questions. 12.4% in Germany and 34.6% in Austria responded.
The surveys revealed a consistent higher usage of nearly all clinical IT systems, especially nursing systems, but also PACS and electronic archiving systems, in Austrian than in German hospitals. These findings correspond with a significantly wider use of standardised nursing terminologies and a higher number of PC workstations on the wards (average 2.1 PCs in Germany, 3.2 PCs in Austria). Despite these differences, Austrian and German hospitals both reported a similar IT budget of 2.6% in Austria and 2.0% in Germany (median).
Despite the many similarities of the Austrian and German healthcare system there are distinct differences which may have led to a wider use of IT systems in Austrian hospitals. In nursing, the specific legal requirement to document nursing diagnoses in Austria may have stimulated the use of standardised terminologies for nursing diagnoses and the implementation of electronic nursing documentation systems. Other factors which correspond with the wider use of clinical IT systems in Austria are: good infrastructure of medical-technical devices, rigorous organisational changes which had led to leaner processes and to a lower length of stay, and finally a more IT friendly climate. As country size is the most pronounced difference between Germany and Austria it could be that smaller countries, such as Austria, are more ready to translate innovation into practice.
信息技术的采用是一个受不同外部和内部因素影响的过程。本研究旨在:1. 比较奥地利和德国医院中医疗和护理信息技术系统的流行程度的异同,2. 将这些发现与两国的特点相匹配,特别是其医疗保健系统和医院的特点。
2007 年,两国的所有急症护理医院都收到了带有相同问题的问卷。德国的回应率为 12.4%,奥地利为 34.6%。
调查显示,奥地利医院几乎所有临床信息技术系统的使用率都明显较高,尤其是护理系统,但也包括 PACS 和电子归档系统。这些发现与更广泛使用标准化护理术语和病房内更多的 PC 工作站相对应(德国平均每病房 2.1 台 PC,奥地利为 3.2 台 PC)。尽管存在这些差异,奥地利和德国的医院都报告了类似的信息技术预算,奥地利为 2.6%,德国为 2.0%(中位数)。
尽管奥地利和德国的医疗保健系统有许多相似之处,但也存在明显的差异,这可能导致奥地利医院更广泛地使用信息技术系统。在护理方面,奥地利特定的法律要求记录护理诊断可能刺激了标准化护理诊断术语的使用和电子护理文档系统的实施。与奥地利更广泛使用临床信息技术系统相对应的其他因素包括:医疗技术设备的良好基础设施、导致流程更精简和住院时间更短的严格组织变革,以及最后更有利于信息技术的氛围。由于德国和奥地利之间最明显的差异是国家规模,因此像奥地利这样的较小国家可能更愿意将创新转化为实践。