Center for Human Genome Variation, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul;18(7):815-20. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.2. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
One surprising feature of the recently completed waves of genome-wide association studies is the limited impact of common genetic variation in individually detectable polymorphisms on many human traits. This has been particularly pronounced for studies on psychiatric conditions, which have failed to produce clear, replicable associations for common variants. One popular explanation for these negative findings is that many of these traits may be genetically heterogeneous, leading to the idea that relevant endophenotypes may be more genetically tractable. Aspects of cognition may be the most important endophenotypes for psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia, leading many researchers to pursue large-scale studies on the genetic contributors of cognitive performance in the normal population as a surrogate for aspects of liability to disease. Here, we perform a genome-wide association study with two tests of executive function, Digit Symbol and Stroop Color-Word, in 1086 healthy volunteers and with an expanded cognitive battery in 514 of these volunteers. We show that, consistent with published studies of the psychiatric conditions themselves, no single common variant has a large effect (explaining >4-8% of the population variation) on the performance of healthy individuals on standardized cognitive tests. Given that these are important endophenotypes, our work is consistent with the idea that identifying rare genetic causes of psychiatric conditions may be more important for future research than identifying genetically homogenous endophenotypes.
最近完成的全基因组关联研究的一波令人惊讶的特征是,常见遗传变异在个体可检测多态性上对许多人类特征的影响有限。这在精神疾病的研究中尤为明显,因为常见变体未能产生明确的、可重复的关联。对于这些负面发现的一个流行解释是,这些特征中的许多可能具有遗传异质性,导致相关的内表型可能更具遗传性。认知方面可能是精神分裂症等精神疾病最重要的内表型,这促使许多研究人员对正常人群认知表现的遗传贡献进行大规模研究,作为疾病易感性的替代指标。在这里,我们对 1086 名健康志愿者进行了两项执行功能测试(数字符号和斯特鲁普颜色-词测试)的全基因组关联研究,并对其中 514 名志愿者进行了扩展的认知测试。我们表明,与精神疾病本身的已发表研究一致,没有一个常见的变异对健康个体在标准化认知测试中的表现有很大影响(解释超过 4-8%的人群变异)。鉴于这些是重要的内表型,我们的工作与这样一种观点一致,即确定精神疾病的罕见遗传原因可能比确定遗传同质的内表型对未来的研究更为重要。