• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠病科的护理工作量。

Nursing workload at a gastroenterology unit.

作者信息

Panunto Marcia Raquel, Guirardello Edinêis de Brito

机构信息

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, RN, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):1009-14. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692009000600013.

DOI:10.1590/s0104-11692009000600013
PMID:20126944
Abstract

One of the biggest challenges nurses face is the need to justify the quantity and quality of staff for care delivery. For this, management instruments are available which help them to determine the staff needed in the nursing team. This descriptive study aims to evaluate the nursing workload at a specialized clinical and surgical gastroenterology unit. To collect data, the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) was used during 30 consecutive days, with 1080 comments, obtained from the records of 149 patients. The mean NAS score was 34.9% and, considering that each point of NAS corresponds to 0.24 hour, on the average, 8.4 hours of nursing care were required within 24 hours. This means that this profile is of patients who demand intermediate and semi-intensive care, which suggests that the NAS study can be used to evaluate the workload of nurses at that unit.

摘要

护士面临的最大挑战之一是需要为护理服务的人员数量和质量提供合理依据。为此,有一些管理工具可帮助他们确定护理团队所需的人员。这项描述性研究旨在评估一家专门的临床和外科胃肠病科的护理工作量。为收集数据,在连续30天内使用了护理活动评分(NAS),从149名患者的记录中获得了1080条评论。NAS的平均评分为34.9%,考虑到NAS的每一分对应0.24小时,平均而言,24小时内需要8.4小时的护理。这意味着这类患者需要中级和半强化护理,这表明NAS研究可用于评估该科室护士的工作量。

相似文献

1
Nursing workload at a gastroenterology unit.胃肠病科的护理工作量。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):1009-14. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692009000600013.
2
Nursing workload in an inpatient unit.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):1139-45. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692011000500011.
3
Assessment of a neonatal unit nursing staff: application of the Nursing Activities Score.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013 Feb;21(1):348-55. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692013000100009.
4
[Patient profile and nursing workload at the nephrology unit].
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2013 Jun;34(2):133-9. doi: 10.1590/s1983-14472013000200017.
5
[The implementation of NEMS and NAS systems to assess the nursing staffing levels in a polyvalent intensive care unit].[实施神经肌肉电刺激(NEMS)和神经适应性刺激(NAS)系统以评估综合重症监护病房的护理人员配备水平]
Assist Inferm Ric. 2008 Jan-Mar;27(1):18-26.
6
[Evaluation of the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) as a nursing workload measurement tool in an adult ICU].[评估护理活动评分(NAS)作为成人重症监护病房护理工作量测量工具的效果]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2007 Sep;41(3):346-54. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342007000300002.
7
Nursing workload and staff allocation in an intensive care unit: a pilot study according to Nursing Activities Score (NAS).重症监护病房护理工作量和人员配置:根据护理活动评分(NAS)的初步研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Apr;26(2):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
8
[Nursing workload in specialized Semi-intensive Therapy unit: workforce size criteria].[专科半强化治疗病房的护理工作量:人力规模标准]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Dec;49(6):960-6. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000600012.
9
Assessment of Nursing Workload as a Mortality Predictor in Intensive Care Units (ICU) Using the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) Scale.使用护理活动评分(NAS)量表评估重症监护病房(ICU)护理工作量作为死亡率预测指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 24;18(1):79. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010079.
10
[Analysis of the workload and the use of the nursing resources in an intensive care unit].[重症监护病房护理工作量及护理资源利用情况分析]
Enferm Intensiva. 2015 Apr-Jun;26(2):72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing Activities Score and workload in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.某大学医院重症监护病房的护理活动评分与工作量
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Jul-Sep;26(3):292-8. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140041.