• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单一与复合激发临床试验在肩部疼痛评估中的临床价值。

Clinical value of single versus composite provocative clinical tests in the assessment of painful shoulder.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;16(3):105-8. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181cf8392.

DOI:10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181cf8392
PMID:20130480
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study were to investigate the clinical value of the provocative clinical tests and propose a composite index for the assessment of painful shoulder, using ultrasonography (US) as reference method.

METHODS

Two hundred three patients with painful shoulder underwent both clinical and US evaluations. The physical examination was carried out performing the Hawkins, Jobe, Patte, Gerber, and Speed tests. Each test was included in a composite index namely, SNAPSHOT (Simple Numeric Assessment of Pain by SHOulder Tests). The US examination was performed by a rheumatologist experienced in US and blinded to clinical findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratio of each clinical test were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the performance of the composite SNAPSHOT index.

RESULTS

Sensitivity was low for the clinical diagnosis of all shoulder abnormalities. The highest sensitivity and smallest negative likelihood ratio were found for the Hawkins (63.88% and 0.50%) and Patte (62.21% and 0.52%) tests. Specificity was good for Speed (76.33%), Gerber (75.42%), and Patte (74.20%) tests. Patte and Speed tests were the most accurate (71.12% and 66.41%, respectively). The calculated area under the ROC curve related to the SNAPSHOT composite index was 0.881 +/- 0.026. With an optimal cut-off point of 3, the sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 87.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study showed that SNAPSHOT is a feasible, informative and quantitative composite index for the assessment of painful shoulder in the clinical setting.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨激发试验的临床价值,并提出一种基于超声(US)作为参考方法的肩部疼痛评估综合指数。

方法

203 例肩部疼痛患者均接受了临床和 US 评估。体格检查包括 Hawkins、Jobe、Patte、Gerber 和 Speed 试验。每个试验均包含在一个复合指数中,即 SNAPSHOT(通过肩部试验进行简单数字疼痛评估)。US 检查由一位具有 US 经验且对临床发现盲法的风湿病学家进行。计算每个临床试验的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、阳性和阴性似然比。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估复合 SNAPSHOT 指数的性能。

结果

所有肩部异常的临床诊断敏感性均较低。Hawkins(63.88%和 0.50%)和 Patte(62.21%和 0.52%)试验的敏感性和最小阴性似然比最高。Speed(76.33%)、Gerber(75.42%)和 Patte(74.20%)试验的特异性较好。Patte 和 Speed 试验最准确(分别为 71.12%和 66.41%)。ROC 曲线下面积与 SNAPSHOT 综合指数相关的计算值为 0.881 +/- 0.026。最佳截断点为 3 时,敏感性和特异性分别为 75.8%和 87.5%。

结论

本研究结果表明,SNAPSHOT 是一种可行、信息丰富且定量的肩部疼痛评估综合指数,适用于临床环境。

相似文献

1
Clinical value of single versus composite provocative clinical tests in the assessment of painful shoulder.单一与复合激发临床试验在肩部疼痛评估中的临床价值。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;16(3):105-8. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181cf8392.
2
Shoulder impingement syndrome: correlations between clinical tests and ultrasonographic findings.肩部撞击综合征:临床检查与超声检查结果之间的相关性
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;11(2):120-6.
3
Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.5种体格检查测试及测试组合对肩峰下撞击症的可靠性和诊断准确性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11):1898-903. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.015.
4
The value of physical tests for subacromial impingement syndrome: a study of diagnostic accuracy.物理检查对肩峰下撞击综合征的价值:一项诊断准确性研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):149-58. doi: 10.1177/0269215509346103.
5
[Clinical research on the efficiency of physical examinations used for diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome].[用于诊断肩峰下撞击综合征的体格检查的有效性临床研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 May;29(5):434-8.
6
Intra- and interexaminer reliability of four manual shoulder maneuvers used to identify subacromial pain.用于识别肩峰下疼痛的四种肩部手法检查的检查者内和检查者间可靠性。
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 5.
7
Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist. XLVII. Ultrasound of the shoulder in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.超声医学进阶教程. XLVII. 痛风和焦磷酸钙沉积病患者的肩关节超声
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Sep-Oct;31(5):659-64. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
8
Ultrasonographic findings of painful shoulders and correlation between physical examination and ultrasonographic rotator cuff tear.肩部疼痛的超声检查结果以及体格检查与超声诊断肩袖撕裂之间的相关性。
Mod Rheumatol. 2007;17(3):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s10165-007-0577-8. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
9
Painful shoulder: comparison of physical examination and ultrasonographic findings.肩部疼痛:体格检查与超声检查结果的比较
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Feb;61(2):132-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.2.132.
10
Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.肩部体格检查测试:诊断测试性能的系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1400-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical examination tests in the acute phase of shoulder injuries with negative radiographs: a diagnostic accuracy study.X线片阴性的肩部损伤急性期体格检查试验:一项诊断准确性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 3;26(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08754-1.
2
Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of common shoulder injuries in sport: grading the evidence - a statement paper commissioned by the Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF).运动中常见肩部损伤的诊断、预防和治疗:证据分级——丹麦运动物理治疗学会(DSSF)委托的一份立场文件。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Apr;57(7):408-416. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105674. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
用于检测肩胛下肌撕裂的临床检查的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 27;9(9):23259671211042011. doi: 10.1177/23259671211042011. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study.肩袖撕裂特殊检查的诊断准确性:ROW队列研究。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;96(3):176-183. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000566.
5
Validation of the Simple Shoulder Test in a Portuguese-Brazilian population. Is the latent variable structure and validation of the Simple Shoulder Test Stable across cultures?《简单肩部测试在葡萄牙-巴西人群中的验证。简单肩部测试的潜在变量结构和验证在跨文化中是否稳定?》
PLoS One. 2013 May 13;8(5):e62890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062890. Print 2013.
6
Validation of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy for the detection of rotator cuff lesions.临床检查与磁共振成像和关节镜检查诊断肩袖损伤的比较。
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Sep;32(9):1283-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2260-0. Epub 2013 May 2.