• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用肥皂和水洗手与使用酒精类洗手液的抗菌效果比较。

Antimicrobial efficacy of soap and water hand washing versus an alcohol-based hand cleanser.

作者信息

Holton Ronald H, Huber Michaell A, Terezhalmy Geza T

机构信息

Clinical Laboratory Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Dental School, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Tex Dent J. 2009 Dec;126(12):1175-80.

PMID:20131613
Abstract

The emergence of alcohol-based hand cleansers may represent an alternative to soap and water in the clinical dental setting. In this study, the antimicrobial efficacy of traditional hand washing vs. a unique alcohol-based hand cleanser with persistence was evaluated. Two experienced dentists participated over a 10-day period. On days 1-5, each clinician used an antibacterial liquid soap (Dial, Dial Corporation, Scottsdale, AZ). Days 6-10, an alcohol-based hand cleanser (Triseptin Water Optional, Healthpoint Surgical, Fort Worth, TX) was used. Sampling was by modified glove juice technique. The results indicate that the alcohol-based hand cleanser dramatically outperforms the traditional hand washing agent in the general dental setting.

摘要

在临床牙科环境中,酒精基洗手液的出现可能是肥皂和水之外的另一种选择。在本研究中,评估了传统洗手方法与一种具有长效性的独特酒精基洗手液的抗菌效果。两名经验丰富的牙医参与了为期10天的研究。在第1至5天,每位临床医生使用抗菌液体肥皂(Dial,Dial公司,亚利桑那州斯科茨代尔)。第6至10天,使用酒精基洗手液(Triseptin Water Optional,Healthpoint Surgical,德克萨斯州沃思堡)。采用改良手套汁液技术进行采样。结果表明,在普通牙科环境中,酒精基洗手液的表现明显优于传统洗手剂。

相似文献

1
Antimicrobial efficacy of soap and water hand washing versus an alcohol-based hand cleanser.用肥皂和水洗手与使用酒精类洗手液的抗菌效果比较。
Tex Dent J. 2009 Dec;126(12):1175-80.
2
Cost analysis of hand hygiene using antimicrobial soap and water versus an alcohol-based hand rub.使用抗菌肥皂和水与使用酒精类擦手剂进行手部卫生清洁的成本分析。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 1;7(2):37-45.
3
Preference and compliance of waterless hand-hygiene products versus soap and water.无水手部卫生产品与肥皂和水相比的偏好及依从性
Am J Dent. 2003 Sep;16 Spec No:17A-19A.
4
Compliance and efficacy of hand rubbing during in-hospital practice.住院期间手部揉搓的依从性和有效性
Med Princ Pract. 2005 Sep-Oct;14(5):313-7. doi: 10.1159/000086928.
5
In-vivo efficacy of hand sanitisers against feline calicivirus: a surrogate for norovirus.手部消毒剂对猫杯状病毒(诺如病毒的替代病毒)的体内疗效
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Feb;68(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
6
Activity of non antiseptic soaps and ethanol for hand disinfection.非抗菌肥皂和乙醇用于手部消毒的活性
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1985 Dec;181(6):496-512.
7
Is alcohol-based hand disinfection equivalent to surgical scrub before placing a central venous catheter?酒精擦手消毒与置管前外科刷手效果等效吗?
Anesth Analg. 2012 Mar;114(3):622-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824083b8. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
8
Single treatment with ethanol hand rub is ineffective against human rhinovirus--hand washing with soap and water removes the virus efficiently.单次使用乙醇手部免洗液对人鼻病毒无效——用肥皂和水洗手能有效地去除病毒。
J Med Virol. 2012 Mar;84(3):543-7. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23222.
9
Efficacy of hand washing with soap and water as compared to antiseptic solutions.与抗菌溶液相比,用肥皂和水洗手的效果。
Indian Pediatr. 1991 Oct;28(10):1214-5.
10
Efficacy of alcohol-based gels compared with simple hand wash and hygienic hand disinfection.与普通洗手和卫生手消毒相比,含酒精凝胶的功效
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S13-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Hand Hygiene Technique with Hydroalcoholic Solution by Image Color Summarize.图像颜色汇总评价醇类手消毒剂的手卫生技术效果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 16;58(8):1108. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081108.
2
A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens.一种测试洗手对去除新出现的传染性病原体效果的方法。
J Vis Exp. 2017 Jun 7(124):55604. doi: 10.3791/55604.
3
Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water.
洗手与埃博拉病毒病疫情:肥皂、洗手液和0.05%氯溶液对手上模型生物Phi6和大肠杆菌的灭活、去除及在冲洗水中残留的随机比较
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172734. eCollection 2017.