Occupational and Environmental Medicine, UCLA, 10880 Wilshire, #1800, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Feb;52(2):150-4. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181cfcf09.
To assess the effect of respirator type and user characteristics (eg, health status) on the subjective response to respirator use.
The subjective responses for multiple domains were evaluated in 104 volunteers performing work tasks in a simulated work environment. Each used a dual cartridge half face mask and a filtering facepiece (N95) respirator. The study population was recruited to include four groups (normal respiratory status, mild asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic rhinitis). Mixed model regression analyses determined the effects of respirator type, disease, gender, and age.
Half face mask produced more adverse subjective response than the N95 for most scales. There were significant interactions such that disease status modified the effect of respirator type. In general, women reported greater adverse ratings than did men.
The effect of respirator type depends on disease status. Respirator design evaluation panels should include persons with mild respiratory disease.
评估呼吸器类型和使用者特征(例如健康状况)对呼吸器使用主观反应的影响。
在模拟工作环境中,104 名志愿者执行工作任务时,对多个领域的主观反应进行了评估。每个人都使用了双罐半面罩和过滤式面罩(N95)呼吸器。研究人群招募包括四个组(正常呼吸状态、轻度哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或慢性鼻炎)。混合模型回归分析确定了呼吸器类型、疾病、性别和年龄的影响。
半面罩在大多数量表上比 N95 产生更多的不良主观反应。存在显著的相互作用,即疾病状态改变了呼吸器类型的影响。一般来说,女性的不良评价比男性更高。
呼吸器类型的影响取决于疾病状态。呼吸器设计评估小组应包括患有轻度呼吸道疾病的人。