Institute of Neurology, UCL, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Prog Neurobiol. 2010 May;91(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
Brain damage can sometimes render a patient persistently unresponsive and yet apparently awake, admitting the possibility that the absence of overt voluntary behaviour might conceal a retained capacity for covert cognition. When given instructions to perform a cognitive task, a minority of patients in such a so-called persistent vegetative state (PVS) has recently been found to exhibit patterns of brain activation closely matching those observed in normal subjects obeying the same instructions. These data have been widely interpreted as implying the detection of covert "consciousness". Here we show that this inference is not supported by the extant data because it relies on critical assumptions, obscured by conceptual unclarities, that are either untested or untestable. We set out the proper grounds for ascribing psychological attributes to PVS patients from physiological evidence of any kind, and offer a perspicuous conceptual framework for future empirical studies in the field.
脑损伤有时会使患者持续无反应,但显然是清醒的,这就有可能使明显的自主行为缺失掩盖了潜在的认知能力。最近发现,在这种所谓的持续性植物状态(PVS)中,当被给予执行认知任务的指令时,少数患者表现出的大脑激活模式与正常受试者在遵守相同指令时观察到的模式非常匹配。这些数据被广泛解释为暗示了隐蔽的“意识”的存在。在这里,我们表明,由于这一推断依赖于一些关键假设,而这些假设被概念上的不清晰所掩盖,要么未经检验,要么无法检验,因此现有数据并不支持这一推断。我们从任何种类的生理证据出发,为将心理属性归因于 PVS 患者奠定了恰当的基础,并为该领域未来的实证研究提供了一个清晰的概念框架。