School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, Faculty of Health and Behavourial Sciences, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.012.
As part of a study that explored how midwives incorporate cultural sensitivity, into their practice, the literature was reviewed to ascertain how the concept of culture has been, defined and what recommendations have been made as to how to provide culturally appropriate care, to individuals from Indigenous and/or ethnic minority backgrounds.
A systematic review of the literature was undertaken.
Electronic databases including Medline, Cinahl, Socio-file and Expanded Academic Index, were accessed.
Several key search terms were used for example, midwife, midwives, midwifery, nurse, nurses, nursing, culture or cultural, diversity, sensitivity, competency and empowerment. The, results relating to midwifery were few; therefore 'nursing' was included which increased the amount, of material. References that were deemed useful from bibliographies of relevant texts and journal, articles were included. The inclusion criteria were articles that provided information about culture, and/or the culturally appropriate care of individuals from Indigenous and/or ethnically, culturally and, linguistically diverse backgrounds. Materials reviewed for this paper satisfied the inclusion criteria.
There are two main approaches to culture; the first focuses on the cognitive aspects of culture, the 'values, beliefs and traditions' of a particular group, identified by language or location such as, 'Chinese women' or 'Arabic speaking women'. This approach views culture as static and unchanging, and fails to account for diversity within groups. The second approach incorporates culture within a wider, structural framework, focusing on social position to explain health status rather than on individual behaviours and beliefs. It includes perspectives on the impact of the colonial process on the ongoing relationships of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people and how this affects health and health care.
Most of the literature focuses on the cognitive aspects of culture and recommends learning about the culture of specific groups which is presumed to apply to everyone. This generic approach can, lead to stereotyping and a failure to identify the needs of the individual receiving care. The concept of, cultural safety derived from the second approach to culture and practice has potential but evidence to show how it is being incorporated into practice is lacking and health professionals appear to be unclear about its meaning.
作为一项探讨助产士如何将文化敏感性融入实践的研究的一部分,对文献进行了回顾,以确定文化概念是如何被定义的,以及如何为来自土著和/或少数族裔背景的个人提供文化上合适的护理提出了哪些建议。
对文献进行了系统回顾。
访问了电子数据库,包括 Medline、Cinahl、Socio-file 和 Expanded Academic Index。
使用了几个关键搜索词,例如助产士、助产士、助产、护士、护士、护理、文化或文化、多样性、敏感性、能力和赋权。与助产相关的结果很少;因此,包括了“护理”,这增加了材料的数量。从相关文本和期刊文章的参考文献中认为有用的参考文献也包括在内。纳入标准是提供有关文化信息的文章,和/或为来自土著和/或族裔、文化和语言多样化背景的个人提供文化上合适的护理的文章。本文综述中审查的材料符合纳入标准。
有两种主要的文化方法;第一种方法侧重于文化的认知方面,即特定群体的“价值观、信仰和传统”,通过语言或地理位置来识别,例如“中国妇女”或“讲阿拉伯语的妇女”。这种方法认为文化是静态和不变的,不能说明群体内部的多样性。第二种方法将文化纳入更广泛的结构框架中,侧重于社会地位来解释健康状况,而不是个人行为和信仰。它包括对殖民过程对土著和非土著人民持续关系的影响以及这如何影响健康和医疗保健的看法。
大多数文献都侧重于文化的认知方面,并建议了解特定群体的文化,这被认为适用于每个人。这种通用方法可能导致刻板印象和未能确定接受护理的个人的需求。文化安全的概念源自文化和实践的第二种方法,具有潜力,但缺乏将其纳入实践的证据,而且卫生专业人员似乎对其含义不清楚。