Suppr超能文献

悲观的解释风格与肺癌不良预后相关。

A pessimistic explanatory style is prognostic for poor lung cancer survival.

机构信息

Cancer Center Statistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Mar;5(3):326-32. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ce70e8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated the importance of personality constructs on health behaviors and health status. Having a pessimistic outlook has been related to negative health behaviors and higher mortality. However, the construct has not been well explored in cancer populations.

METHODS

Survival time of 534 adults who were diagnosed with lung cancer was examined. The patients had completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory approximately 18.2 years before receiving their lung cancer diagnosis. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Optimism-Pessimism scores were divided into high (60 or more) and low scores (<60), and log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine survival differences. Multivariate Cox models were used for assessing prognostic values of pessimism along with other known predictors for lung cancer survival outcome. Bootstrapping of the survival models was used as a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

At the time of lung cancer diagnosis, patients were at an average age of 67 years old; 48% of them were women, 85% had non-small cell lung cancer, 15% had small cell lung cancer, 30% were stage I, 4% were stage II, 31% were stage III/limited, and 35% were stage IV/extensive. Patients who exhibited a nonpessimistic explanatory style survived approximately 6 months longer than patients classified as having a pessimistic explanatory style.

CONCLUSION

Among lung cancer patients, those having a pessimistic explanatory style experienced a less favorable survival outcome, which may be related to cancer treatment decisions. Further research in this area is warranted.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,人格结构对健康行为和健康状况具有重要意义。悲观的态度与负面的健康行为和更高的死亡率有关。然而,这一结构在癌症人群中尚未得到充分探索。

方法

研究了 534 名被诊断患有肺癌的成年人的生存时间。这些患者在接受肺癌诊断前约 18.2 年完成了明尼苏达多相人格问卷。将明尼苏达多相人格问卷乐观-悲观分数分为高分(60 或更高)和低分(<60),并使用对数秩检验和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线确定生存差异。使用多变量 Cox 模型评估悲观情绪与其他已知肺癌生存结果预测因素的预后价值。使用生存模型的自举作为敏感性分析。

结果

在肺癌诊断时,患者的平均年龄为 67 岁;48%为女性,85%为非小细胞肺癌,15%为小细胞肺癌,30%为 I 期,4%为 II 期,31%为 III/局限期,35%为 IV/广泛期。表现出非悲观解释风格的患者比被归类为悲观解释风格的患者的生存时间长约 6 个月。

结论

在肺癌患者中,具有悲观解释风格的患者的生存结果较差,这可能与癌症治疗决策有关。该领域的进一步研究是必要的。

相似文献

10
Pessimism in the profile: estimating explanatory style from the MMPI.剖析图中的悲观主义:从明尼苏达多相人格测验评估解释风格。
J Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;54(2):169-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199802)54:2<169::aid-jclp6>3.0.co;2-n.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Long-term survivorship in lung cancer: a review.肺癌的长期生存:综述
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):1088-97. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.1088.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验