Suppr超能文献

手法物理治疗对肩部疼痛病症的有效性:一项系统综述。

Effectiveness of manual physical therapy for painful shoulder conditions: a systematic review.

作者信息

Camarinos James, Marinko Lee

机构信息

College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences; Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA. 635 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02115, Boston University.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(4):206-15. doi: 10.1179/106698109791352076.

Abstract

Multiple disease-specific systematic reviews on the effectiveness of physical therapy intervention for shoulder dysfunction have been inconclusive. To date, there have been two systematic reviews that examined manual therapy specifically but both considered effects within diagnoses. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the effectiveness of manual therapy to the glenohumeral joint across all painful shoulder conditions. A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials for articles dated 1996 to June 2009 was performed. Inclusion for review were manual therapy performed to the glenohumeral joint only; non-surgical painful shoulder disorders; subjects 18-80 years; and outcomes of range of motion, pain, function, and/or quality of life. Quality assessment was performed using the PEDro scale with subsequent data extraction. Seventeen related articles were found with seven fitting the inclusion criteria. The average PEDro score was 7.86, meeting the cutoff score for high quality. Significant heterogeneity in outcome measures prohibited meta-analysis. Five studies demonstrated benefits utilizing manual therapy for mobility, and four demonstrated a trend towards decreasing pain values. Functional outcomes and quality-of-life measures varied greatly among all studies. Manual therapy appears to increase either active or passive mobility of the shoulder. A trend was found favoring manual therapy for decreasing pain, but the effect on function and quality of life remains inconclusive. Future research utilizing consistent outcome measurements is necessary.

摘要

多项针对物理治疗干预对肩部功能障碍有效性的特定疾病系统评价尚无定论。迄今为止,已有两项专门研究手法治疗的系统评价,但两者均考虑了诊断范围内的效果。本系统评价的目的是确定手法治疗对所有肩部疼痛病症的盂肱关节的有效性。对1996年至2009年6月期间的MEDLINE、CINAHL、科学网和Cochrane随机对照试验中心注册库进行了文献检索。纳入综述的标准为:仅对盂肱关节进行手法治疗;非手术性肩部疼痛病症;18 - 80岁的受试者;以及活动范围、疼痛、功能和/或生活质量的结果。使用PEDro量表进行质量评估并随后进行数据提取。共找到17篇相关文章,其中7篇符合纳入标准。平均PEDro评分为7.86,达到高质量的截止分数。结果测量的显著异质性禁止进行荟萃分析。五项研究表明手法治疗对活动能力有益,四项研究显示疼痛值有下降趋势。所有研究中的功能结果和生活质量测量差异很大。手法治疗似乎能增加肩部的主动或被动活动度。发现有支持手法治疗减轻疼痛的趋势,但对功能和生活质量的影响仍无定论。未来需要采用一致的结果测量方法进行研究。

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
A pilot randomized, controlled trial of treatment for painful arc of the shoulder.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1 Suppl):17S-21S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验