Institute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia.
Environ Manage. 2010 Apr;45(4):682-96. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9444-z. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
The decline in biodiversity is a worldwide phenomenon, with current rates of species extinction more dramatic than any previously recorded. Habitat loss has been identified as the major cause of biodiversity decline. In this article we suggest that a statutory duty of care would complement the current mix of policy options for biodiversity conservation. Obstacles hindering the introduction of a statutory duty of care include linguistic ambiguity about the terms 'duty of care' and 'stewardship' and how they are applied in a natural resource management context, and the absence of a mechanism to guide its implementation. Drawing on international literature and key informant interviews we have articulated characteristics of duty of care to reduce linguistic ambiguity, and developed a framework for implementing a duty of care for biodiversity at the regional scale. The framework draws on key elements of the common law 'duty of care', the concepts of 'taking reasonable care' and 'avoiding foreseeable harm', in its logic. Core elements of the framework include desired outcomes for biodiversity, supported by current recommended practices. The focus on outcomes provides opportunities for the development of innovative management practices. The framework incorporates multiple pathways for the redress of non-compliance including tiered negative sanctions, and positive measures to encourage compliance. Importantly, the framework addresses the need for change and adaptation that is a necessary part of biodiversity management.
生物多样性的减少是一个全球性的现象,目前物种灭绝的速度比以往任何时候都要快。栖息地的丧失已被确定为生物多样性减少的主要原因。在本文中,我们认为,法定注意义务可以补充当前保护生物多样性的政策选择组合。阻碍法定注意义务引入的障碍包括“注意义务”和“管理”这两个术语在自然资源管理背景下的语言歧义,以及缺乏指导其实施的机制。我们借鉴国际文献和关键信息提供者的访谈,阐述了注意义务的特点,以减少语言歧义,并为在区域尺度上实施生物多样性注意义务制定了一个框架。该框架在其逻辑中借鉴了普通法“注意义务”的关键要素,以及“合理注意”和“避免可预见的伤害”的概念。该框架的核心要素包括以当前建议的实践为支撑的生物多样性的预期结果。关注结果为创新管理实践的发展提供了机会。该框架包括多种纠正违规行为的途径,包括分级负面制裁和鼓励遵守的积极措施。重要的是,该框架解决了适应生物多样性管理所必需的变革和适应的需求。