Suppr超能文献

草率下结论、一般智力与精神病倾向:来自多中心欧盟-基因-环境相互作用研究的结果。

Jumping to conclusions, general intelligence, and psychosis liability: findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, LondonSE5 8AF, UK.

Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, LondonSE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2021 Mar;51(4):623-633. doi: 10.1017/S003329171900357X. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'jumping to conclusions' (JTC) bias is associated with both psychosis and general cognition but their relationship is unclear. In this study, we set out to clarify the relationship between the JTC bias, IQ, psychosis and polygenic liability to schizophrenia and IQ.

METHODS

A total of 817 first episode psychosis patients and 1294 population-based controls completed assessments of general intelligence (IQ), and JTC, and provided blood or saliva samples from which we extracted DNA and computed polygenic risk scores for IQ and schizophrenia.

RESULTS

The estimated proportion of the total effect of case/control differences on JTC mediated by IQ was 79%. Schizophrenia polygenic risk score was non-significantly associated with a higher number of beads drawn (B = 0.47, 95% CI -0.21 to 1.16, p = 0.17); whereas IQ PRS (B = 0.51, 95% CI 0.25-0.76, p < 0.001) significantly predicted the number of beads drawn, and was thus associated with reduced JTC bias. The JTC was more strongly associated with the higher level of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in controls, including after controlling for IQ (B = -1.7, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.5, p = 0.006), but did not relate to delusions in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the JTC reasoning bias in psychosis might not be a specific cognitive deficit but rather a manifestation or consequence, of general cognitive impairment. Whereas, in the general population, the JTC bias is related to PLEs, independent of IQ. The work has the potential to inform interventions targeting cognitive biases in early psychosis.

摘要

背景

“仓促结论”(JTC)偏向与精神病和一般认知都有关,但它们之间的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在阐明 JTC 偏向、智商、精神病和精神分裂症的多基因易感性与智商之间的关系。

方法

共有 817 名首发精神病患者和 1294 名基于人群的对照者完成了一般智力(智商)和 JTC 的评估,并提供了血液或唾液样本,从中提取了 DNA,并计算了智商和精神分裂症的多基因风险评分。

结果

JTC 中病例/对照差异的总效应由智商介导的估计比例为 79%。精神分裂症多基因风险评分与抽取的珠子数量呈正相关(B = 0.47,95%CI-0.21 至 1.16,p = 0.17);而智商 PRS(B = 0.51,95%CI 0.25-0.76,p < 0.001)显著预测了珠子的数量,因此与 JTC 偏向减少有关。JTC 与对照组中较高水平的类精神病样体验(PLEs)的关系更为密切,包括在控制智商后(B = -1.7,95%CI-2.8 至-0.5,p = 0.006),但与患者的妄想无关。

结论

我们的发现表明,精神病中的 JTC 推理偏向可能不是特定的认知缺陷,而是一般认知障碍的表现或后果。然而,在一般人群中,JTC 偏向与 PLEs 有关,与智商无关。这项工作有可能为针对早期精神病认知偏差的干预措施提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5964/8020493/2541d4645970/S003329171900357X_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验