NNP-BC, Children's Hospital Boston, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, 7-North NICU, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):526-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1715. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends observation of preterm and at-risk infants in their car seat before hospital discharge to screen for breathing problems. This observation period, which we refer to as the infant car seat challenge (ICSC), is used to determine readiness for travel in a car seat. Infants who fail the ICSC are recommended to travel in a car bed. Limited data exist to identify risk factors for failing the ICSC, and no guidelines are available to facilitate transition from car beds to car seats. The purpose of this study was to determine whether weight and age are predictors for passing the ICSC.
This retrospective study evaluated 43 infants referred to the Children's Hospital Boston Center for Healthy Infant Lung Development for a repeat ICSC after initial failure and 37 infants who passed or failed their initial ICSC at the Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center. Gender, birth weight, gestational age (GA), weight (ICSC weight), corrected GA, and chronological age at time of ICSC were extracted, and logistic regression analysis was performed.
The average GA at birth of infants referred was 35 weeks 2 days (+/-2 weeks 3 days), and almost equal numbers of boys and girls were referred. A majority of infants passed their initial rechallenge (38 [88%] of 43). Infants who failed the repeat challenge were slightly smaller (3327 +/- 927 vs 3913 +/- 936 g) and younger at time of retesting (CGA 40 weeks 5 days vs 42 weeks 5 days; chronological age 39.2 vs 52.2 days). Neither weight nor age at initial or repeat ICSC predicted passing the ICSC.
This study suggests that ICSC screenings remain the safest method for transitioning preterm infants from a car bed to a car seat.
美国儿科学会建议对早产儿和高危婴儿在出院前在汽车座椅上进行观察,以筛查呼吸问题。我们将这段观察期称为婴儿汽车座椅挑战(ICSC),用于确定婴儿在汽车座椅上旅行的准备情况。未能通过 ICSC 的婴儿被建议乘坐汽车床旅行。目前,有关识别未能通过 ICSC 的危险因素的数据有限,也没有指南可用于促进从汽车床过渡到汽车座椅。本研究的目的是确定体重和年龄是否是通过 ICSC 的预测因素。
这项回顾性研究评估了 43 名因初次 ICSC 失败而被转介到波士顿儿童医院健康婴儿肺发育中心进行重复 ICSC 的婴儿,以及 37 名在圣伊丽莎白医疗中心通过或未通过初次 ICSC 的婴儿。提取性别、出生体重、胎龄(GA)、体重(ICSC 体重)、校正 GA 和 ICSC 时的实际年龄,并进行逻辑回归分析。
转介婴儿的平均出生 GA 为 35 周 2 天(+/-2 周 3 天),男女比例大致相等。大多数婴儿通过了初次再挑战(43 名中的 38 名[88%])。在进行重复挑战时失败的婴儿略小(3327 +/- 927 与 3913 +/- 936 克),并且在重新测试时年龄较小(校正 GA 40 周 5 天与 42 周 5 天;实际年龄 39.2 与 52.2 天)。初始和重复 ICSC 的体重和年龄均不能预测是否通过 ICSC。
本研究表明,ICSC 筛查仍然是将早产儿从汽车床过渡到汽车座椅最安全的方法。