• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个旨在让社区参与研究的小额资助计划。

A small grants program to involve communities in research.

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2010 Jun;35(3):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9235-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-010-9235-8
PMID:20146091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2885839/
Abstract

A key tenet of community-based participatory research is that communities be involved in all facets of research, from defining the problem to identifying solutions, to assisting in the research, and to participating in the publication of results. In this study, we instituted a small grants program for community participation. A Request for Applications (RFA) was developed and circulated widely throughout the Valley. The RFA sought proposals to address health disparities in cancer education, prevention, and treatment among Hispanics living in the Valley. Funds available were $2,500.00-3,500.00 for 1 year's worth of work. To help evaluate the progress of the RFA community projects according to the perspectives of the Community Advisory Board (CAB), an open-ended, semi-structured interview was created and administered by a former staff member to CAB members. In 4 years, ten small grants proposed by community members were funded. Funds allocated totaled approximately $25,000. Interviews with CAB members indicated that the RFA program was perceived positively, but there were concerns about sustainability. Our community grants program resulted in the implementation of several novel cancer prevention programs conducted by a variety of community organizations in the Lower Yakima Valley.

摘要

社区参与式研究的一个重要原则是,社区应该参与研究的各个方面,从确定问题到确定解决方案,到协助研究,再到参与研究结果的发布。在这项研究中,我们为社区参与设立了一个小额资助计划。制定了一份申请建议书(RFA),并在山谷地区广泛传播。RFA 寻求提案,以解决居住在山谷地区的西班牙裔人群在癌症教育、预防和治疗方面的健康差异问题。可用资金为 2500.00-3500.00 美元,为期一年的工作。为了根据社区咨询委员会(CAB)的观点帮助评估 RFA 社区项目的进展情况,我们创建了一个开放式、半结构化的访谈,并由前工作人员向 CAB 成员进行了管理。在四年内,由社区成员提出的十个小额资助提案获得了资助。分配的资金总计约为 25000 美元。对 CAB 成员的访谈表明,RFA 计划得到了积极的评价,但对可持续性存在担忧。我们的社区资助计划促成了由下雅基马山谷的各种社区组织实施的几个新颖的癌症预防计划。

相似文献

1
A small grants program to involve communities in research.一个旨在让社区参与研究的小额资助计划。
J Community Health. 2010 Jun;35(3):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9235-8.
2
Experiences from a community advisory Board in the Implementation of early access to ART for all in Eswatini: a qualitative study.在斯威士兰实施全民早期获得抗逆转录病毒治疗的社区咨询委员会经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0384-8.
3
Establishment of a Community Advisory Board (CAB) for tuberculosis control and research in the Inanda, Ntuzuma and KwaMashu (INK) area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省因安迪纳、恩图兹马和夸马舒(INK)地区建立社区咨询委员会(CAB),以进行结核病控制和研究。
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
4
Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members in a Community-Academic Partnership.社区-学术伙伴关系中社区咨询委员会成员的观点
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(4):1529-1543. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0110.
5
Establishing a community advisory board to align harm reduction research with the unique needs of Black and Latine communities.建立一个社区咨询委员会,使减少伤害研究与黑人和拉丁裔社区的独特需求相契合。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 12;22(Suppl 1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01214-y.
6
Type 2 diabetes among rural Hispanics in Washington State: perspectives from community stakeholders.华盛顿州农村西班牙裔中的2型糖尿病:社区利益相关者的观点
Health Promot Pract. 2010 Jul;11(4):589-99. doi: 10.1177/1524839909354458. Epub 2010 May 20.
7
Connecting community with campus to address cancer health disparities: a community grants program model.连接社区与校园以解决癌症健康差异:一种社区资助项目模式。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):207-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0027.
8
The Bay Area Muslim mental health community advisory board: evaluation of a community based participatory approach.湾区穆斯林心理健康社区顾问委员会:对社区参与式方法的评估。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023 Jan 31;32:e7. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000786.
9
Creating a Culture of Health for Perinatal Women with Mental Illness: A Community-Engaged Policy and Research Initiative.为患有精神疾病的围产期妇女营造健康文化:一项社区参与的政策与研究倡议。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):135-144. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0033.
10
For the Community, by the Community: Advancing Research for Latino Communities in Dementia Care Following the Guidance of Latino Older Adults.取之于社区,用之于社区:在拉丁裔老年人的指导下推进针对拉丁裔社区痴呆症护理的研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 May 22;22:E21. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.240381.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing barriers to sustainable academic-community partnerships through Community Health Grants.通过社区健康资助消除可持续学术-社区伙伴关系的障碍。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 27;9(1):e66. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.39. eCollection 2025.
2
Mobilizing community-driven health promotion through community granting programs: a rapid systematic review.通过社区拨款项目调动社区驱动的健康促进:快速系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18443-8.
3
Small CBPR Grants Program: An Innovative Model to Build Sustainable Academic-Community Partnerships.小型社区参与式行动研究资助计划:建立可持续学术-社区伙伴关系的创新模式。
Metrop Univ. 2023 Nov 1;34(5):7-19. doi: 10.18060/27204.
4
Building the foundation for equitable and inclusive research: Seed grant programs to facilitate development of diverse CBPR community-academic research partnerships.为公平和包容性研究奠定基础:种子基金项目助力多元社区-学术研究伙伴关系的发展。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 24;7(1):e2. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.495. eCollection 2023.
5
Implementation of a Community Grant Program to Address Community-Driven Environmental Health Concerns.实施一项社区资助计划以解决社区主导的环境卫生问题。
Local Environ. 2020;25(11-12):830-848. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1843419. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
6
Developing pathways for community-led research with big data: a content analysis of stakeholder interviews.发展社区主导的大数据研究途径:利益相关者访谈的内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 8;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00589-7.
7
Seasonal and occupational trends of five organophosphate pesticides in house dust.室内灰尘中五种有机磷农药的季节性和职业性趋势。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;27(4):372-378. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.45. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Lessons Learned from Three Models that Use Small Grants for Building Academic-Community Partnerships for Research.从三个利用小额赠款建立学术-社区研究合作关系的模式中吸取的经验教训。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):527-48. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0076.
9
The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned.美国国家癌症研究所减少癌症健康差距的社区网络计划倡议:成果与经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015;9 Suppl(0):21-32. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0017.
10
Service users' perspectives in the design of an online tool for assisted self-help in mental health: a case study of implications.服务使用者在心理健康辅助自助在线工具设计中的观点:一个案例研究的启示。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Jan 9;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic oral health transformation project.亚基马谷农场工人诊所口腔健康转型项目。
J Public Health Dent. 2020 Sep;80 Suppl 2:S114-S116. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12405. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Study designs for effectiveness and translation research :identifying trade-offs.有效性和转化研究的研究设计:权衡取舍的确定
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):139-154. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.005.
3
Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers.维持基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中的挑战与促进因素:来自底特律、纽约市和西雅图城市研究中心的经验教训
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1022-40. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1.
4
Maryland's Special Populations Network. A model for cancer disparities research, education, and training.马里兰州特殊人群网络。癌症差异研究、教育与培训的典范。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8 Suppl):2061-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22158.
5
Community-based prevention marketing: organizing a community for health behavior intervention.基于社区的预防营销:组织社区进行健康行为干预。
Health Promot Pract. 2007 Apr;8(2):154-63. doi: 10.1177/1524839906290089. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
6
The greater Denver Latino Cancer Prevention/Control Network. Prevention and research through a community-based approach.大丹佛拉丁裔癌症预防/控制网络。通过基于社区的方法进行预防和研究。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8 Suppl):2034-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22146.
7
Celebremos la salud! a community randomized trial of cancer prevention (United States).庆祝健康!一项癌症预防的社区随机试验(美国)。
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Jun;17(5):733-46. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0006-x.
8
'We are not just participants--we are in charge': the NACCHO ear trial and the process for Aboriginal community-controlled health research.“我们不只是参与者——我们掌控一切”:全国原住民社区控制健康组织耳部试验及原住民社区控制健康研究流程
Ethn Health. 2005 May;10(2):91-111. doi: 10.1080/13557850500071038.
9
Community based participatory research: a promising approach for increasing epidemiology's relevance in the 21st century.基于社区的参与性研究:一种提升流行病学在21世纪相关性的有前景的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):499-506. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh010. Epub 2004 May 20.
10
Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints.评估改善社区健康的伙伴关系:追踪足迹。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Feb;27(1):49-91. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-1-49.