O'Donnell J B, Ekman E F, Spalding W M, Bhadra P, McCabe D, Berger M F
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Int Med Res. 2009 Nov-Dec;37(6):1789-802. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700615.
Two 6-week studies compared the analgesic efficacy, tolerability and safety of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (celecoxib 200 mg twice a day [bid]) and an opioid (tramadol HCl 50 mg four times a day [qid]) in subjects with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). Successful responders (primary endpoint) were defined as subjects completing 6 weeks of treatment and having > or = 30% improvement on the Numerical Rating Scale for pain. A total of 796 and 802 subjects were randomized to treatment in study 1 and study 2, respectively. A significantly greater percentage of celecoxib-treated subjects were successful responders compared with tramadol HCl-treated subjects (study 1: 63.2% versus 49.9%, respectively; study 2: 64.1% versus 55.1%, respectively). Fewer adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were reported in the celecoxib-treated group. Overall, celecoxib 200 mg bid was more effective than tramadol HCl 50 mg qid in the treatment of CLBP, with fewer AEs reported.
两项为期6周的研究比较了一种非甾体抗炎药(塞来昔布200毫克,每日两次)和一种阿片类药物(盐酸曲马多50毫克,每日四次)对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的镇痛效果、耐受性和安全性。成功的应答者(主要终点)定义为完成6周治疗且疼痛数字评分量表改善≥30%的患者。在研究1和研究2中,分别有796名和802名受试者被随机分配接受治疗。与盐酸曲马多治疗的受试者相比,塞来昔布治疗的受试者中成功应答者的比例显著更高(研究1:分别为63.2%和49.9%;研究2:分别为64.1%和55.1%)。塞来昔布治疗组报告的不良事件(AE)和严重AE较少。总体而言,塞来昔布200毫克每日两次在治疗CLBP方面比盐酸曲马多50毫克每日四次更有效,且报告的AE较少。