Suppr超能文献

测试语义饱和的联想解释。

Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.

机构信息

Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun;60(4):267-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

Abstract

How is the meaning of a word retrieved without interference from recently viewed words? The ROUSE theory of priming assumes a discounting process to reduce source confusion between subsequently presented words. As applied to semantic satiation, this theory predicted a loss of association between the lexical item and meaning. Four experiments tested this explanation in a speeded category-matching task. All experiments used lists of 20 trials that presented a cue word for 1s followed by a target word. Randomly mixed across the list, 10 trials used cues drawn from the same category whereas the other 10 trials used cues from 10 other categories. In Experiments 1a and 1b, the cues were repeated category labels (FRUIT-APPLE) and responses gradually slowed for the repeated category. In Experiment 2, the cues were nonrepeated exemplars (PEAR-APPLE) and responses remained faster for the repeated category. In Experiment 3, the cues were repeated exemplars in a word matching task (APPLE-APPLE) and responses again remained faster for the repeated category.

摘要

一个单词的意义是如何在不受最近看过的单词干扰的情况下被检索出来的?启动的 ROUSE 理论假设存在一个折扣过程,以减少随后呈现的单词之间的来源混淆。应用于语义饱和时,该理论预测词汇项和意义之间的关联会丧失。四项实验在一个快速类别匹配任务中检验了这个解释。所有实验都使用了 20 个试验的列表,每个试验呈现一个提示词持续 1 秒,然后呈现一个目标词。在列表中随机混合,10 个试验使用来自同一类别(FRUIT-APPLE)的提示词,而其他 10 个试验使用来自 10 个其他类别的提示词。在实验 1a 和 1b 中,提示词是重复的类别标签(FRUIT-APPLE),对于重复的类别,反应逐渐变慢。在实验 2 中,提示词是非重复的示例(PEAR-APPLE),对于重复的类别,反应仍然更快。在实验 3 中,提示词是在单词匹配任务中的重复示例(APPLE-APPLE),对于重复的类别,反应再次更快。

相似文献

1
Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun;60(4):267-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
2
Two routes for activation in the priming of categorical coordinates.
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jan;135(1):65-83. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.1.65-83.
3
An investigation of time course of category and semantic priming.
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Apr;135(2):133-48. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.2.133-150.
4
Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):973-88. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.973.
5
Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):112-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014677.
7
Lexical but not semantic priming in Alzheimer's disease.
Psychol Aging. 1991 Dec;6(4):522-7. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.522.
8
Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.
Mem Cognit. 1995 Nov;23(6):701-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03200923.
9
Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 May;15(3):388-97. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.3.388.
10
Semantic organization and verbal episodic memory in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Jul;13(4):559-74. doi: 10.1080/01688639108401071.

引用本文的文献

2
Revealing the mechanisms of semantic satiation with deep learning models.
Commun Biol. 2024 Apr 22;7(1):487. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06162-0.
3
The Mechanism of Word Satiation in Tibetan Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements.
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Nov 1;15(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.5.3. eCollection 2022.
4
A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec;150(12):2567-2590. doi: 10.1037/xge0001055. Epub 2021 May 20.
5
Neural habituation enhances novelty detection: an EEG study of rapidly presented words.
Comput Brain Behav. 2020 Jun;3(2):208-227. doi: 10.1007/s42113-019-00071-w. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
A Lexical Representational Mechanism Underlying Verbal Satiation: An Empirical Study With Rarely Used Chinese Characters.
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 2;10:2236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02236. eCollection 2019.
8
The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1717-1739. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1385-6.
9
The role of language in emotion: predictions from psychological constructionism.
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 14;6:444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00444. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;11(4):608-26. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0056-8.
2
The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1389-416. doi: 10.1037/a0013625.
3
Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1305-24. doi: 10.1037/a0013370.
4
Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):324-47. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.324.
6
Cumulating retrieval inhibition in semantic and lexical domains.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):496-507. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.496.
7
Confusion and compensation in visual perception: effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):40-61. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.40.
8
Repeated masked category primes interfere with related exemplars: new evidence for negative semantic priming.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):108-20. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.108.
9
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195588.
10
Mediated satiation in verbal transfer.
J Exp Psychol. 1962 Oct;64:346-51. doi: 10.1037/h0044630.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验