Suppr超能文献

测试语义饱和的联想解释。

Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.

机构信息

Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun;60(4):267-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

Abstract

How is the meaning of a word retrieved without interference from recently viewed words? The ROUSE theory of priming assumes a discounting process to reduce source confusion between subsequently presented words. As applied to semantic satiation, this theory predicted a loss of association between the lexical item and meaning. Four experiments tested this explanation in a speeded category-matching task. All experiments used lists of 20 trials that presented a cue word for 1s followed by a target word. Randomly mixed across the list, 10 trials used cues drawn from the same category whereas the other 10 trials used cues from 10 other categories. In Experiments 1a and 1b, the cues were repeated category labels (FRUIT-APPLE) and responses gradually slowed for the repeated category. In Experiment 2, the cues were nonrepeated exemplars (PEAR-APPLE) and responses remained faster for the repeated category. In Experiment 3, the cues were repeated exemplars in a word matching task (APPLE-APPLE) and responses again remained faster for the repeated category.

摘要

一个单词的意义是如何在不受最近看过的单词干扰的情况下被检索出来的?启动的 ROUSE 理论假设存在一个折扣过程,以减少随后呈现的单词之间的来源混淆。应用于语义饱和时,该理论预测词汇项和意义之间的关联会丧失。四项实验在一个快速类别匹配任务中检验了这个解释。所有实验都使用了 20 个试验的列表,每个试验呈现一个提示词持续 1 秒,然后呈现一个目标词。在列表中随机混合,10 个试验使用来自同一类别(FRUIT-APPLE)的提示词,而其他 10 个试验使用来自 10 个其他类别的提示词。在实验 1a 和 1b 中,提示词是重复的类别标签(FRUIT-APPLE),对于重复的类别,反应逐渐变慢。在实验 2 中,提示词是非重复的示例(PEAR-APPLE),对于重复的类别,反应仍然更快。在实验 3 中,提示词是在单词匹配任务中的重复示例(APPLE-APPLE),对于重复的类别,反应再次更快。

相似文献

1
Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.测试语义饱和的联想解释。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun;60(4):267-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
9
Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.单词片段提示:词汇搜索假说。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 May;15(3):388-97. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.3.388.

引用本文的文献

4
A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect.一种关于负相容效应的神经习惯化解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec;150(12):2567-2590. doi: 10.1037/xge0001055. Epub 2021 May 20.

本文引用的文献

4
Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects.即时启动和认知后效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):324-47. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.324.
6
Cumulating retrieval inhibition in semantic and lexical domains.语义和词汇领域累积性检索抑制
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):496-507. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.496.
7
Confusion and compensation in visual perception: effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):40-61. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.40.
10
Mediated satiation in verbal transfer.言语传递中的中介性饱腹感。
J Exp Psychol. 1962 Oct;64:346-51. doi: 10.1037/h0044630.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验