• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[哪些腹部切口易导致切口疝?]

[Which abdominal incisions predispose for incisional hernias?].

作者信息

Seiler C M, Diener M K

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2010 Mar;81(3):186-91. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1816-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-009-1816-7
PMID:20157688
Abstract

Incisional hernias are the most common long-term complication after laparotomy with a cumulative incidence up to 20%. Generally all injuries to the integrity of the abdominal wall can result in the development of an incisional hernia. Midline and transverse incisions cause similar hernia rates. By selection of a sufficient closure technique and appropriate suture material as well as taking appropriate accompanying treatment (antibiotic prophylaxis) and risk factors into consideration, surgery can reduce surgical site infections, wound dehiscence and incisional hernias. Results from randomized controlled trials have not yet demonstrated a superiority of laparoscope-assisted procedures compared to laparotomy for the prevention of incisional hernias. Access through natural orifices and removal of specimens through the same approach (NOTES) may prevent incisional hernias completely. The approach to the abdominal cavity has to be chosen according to the underlying disease of the patient, the anatomical conditions and further circumstances (e.g. urgency, extensibility, preservation of function of the abdominal wall and safety).

摘要

切口疝是剖腹手术后最常见的长期并发症,累积发生率高达20%。一般来说,腹壁完整性的所有损伤都可能导致切口疝的发生。中线切口和横切口导致的疝发生率相似。通过选择足够的闭合技术和合适的缝合材料,以及考虑适当的伴随治疗(抗生素预防)和风险因素,手术可以减少手术部位感染、伤口裂开和切口疝。随机对照试验的结果尚未证明腹腔镜辅助手术在预防切口疝方面优于剖腹手术。通过自然腔道进入并通过相同途径取出标本(NOTES)可能完全预防切口疝。必须根据患者的基础疾病、解剖条件和其他情况(如紧迫性、可扩展性、腹壁功能的保留和安全性)来选择进入腹腔的方法。

相似文献

1
[Which abdominal incisions predispose for incisional hernias?].[哪些腹部切口易导致切口疝?]
Chirurg. 2010 Mar;81(3):186-91. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1816-7.
2
Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision.预防切口疝:如何关闭中线切口。
Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;93(5):1027-40. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.009.
3
Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia.腹壁切口疝的发生率与预防。
J Visc Surg. 2012 Oct;149(5 Suppl):e3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
4
Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision.上腹部手术后切口疝:中线切口与横向切口的随机对照试验
Hernia. 2009 Jun;13(3):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0469-7. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
5
Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates?腹腔镜结直肠手术中提取部位的位置会对切口疝发生率产生影响吗?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2596-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9845-8. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
6
A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions.一项评估小缝线对中线切口切口疝发生率影响的多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2011 Aug 26;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-20.
7
[Wound rupture--incisional hernia].[伤口破裂——切口疝]
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(3):190-2.
8
Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial.缝线长度对中线切口闭合后伤口并发症的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1056-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.189.
9
Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).用于闭合初次择期腹部正中切口的间断或连续可缓慢吸收缝线:一项多中心随机试验(INSECT:ISRCTN24023541)
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):576-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.
10
Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.重大胃肠道手术后的腹壁裂开和切口疝——三种缝合技术的比较
Eur J Surg. 1995 May;161(5):349-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Incisional Hernia Rates After Laparoscopic or Open Abdominal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜或开腹手术后切口疝发生率——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2319-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3520-3.
2
Dynamic ultrasound with postural change facilitated the detection of an incisional hernia in a case with negative MRI findings.姿势改变下的动态超声检查有助于在MRI检查结果为阴性的病例中发现切口疝。
J Ultrasound. 2014 Nov 15;18(3):279-81. doi: 10.1007/s40477-014-0146-x. eCollection 2015 Sep.
3
[Complications of minimally invasive adrenalectomy].

本文引用的文献

1
Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583].CONTINT 研究设计和现状:急诊腹正中切口连续与间断关腹的随机对照多中心研究 [NCT00544583]。
Trials. 2012 May 30;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-72.
2
Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis.择期经中线切口关闭术:INLINE 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 May;251(5):843-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4.
3
Surgery: A midline or transverse abdominal incision?
[微创肾上腺切除术的并发症]
Chirurg. 2015 Jan;86(1):29-32. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2821-z.
4
Small bowel lesion due to spiral tacks after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernia.腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术后因螺旋钉导致的小肠损伤(用于切口疝修补)
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4(3):283-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
5
Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: are there only benefits for symptomatic patients?切口疝修补术后的长期随访:只有有症状的患者才受益吗?
Hernia. 2013 Apr;17(2):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0955-9. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
6
[Approaches to the abdominal cavity and closure of the abdominal wall].[进入腹腔及腹壁闭合的方法]
Chirurg. 2011 Dec;82(12):1067-74. doi: 10.1007/s00104-011-2114-8.
7
Oligosymptomatic vs. symptomatic incisional hernias--who benefits from open repair?症状性与非症状性切口疝——开放修补术的获益人群?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;396(2):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0659-5. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
手术:腹部正中切口还是横切口?
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;6(10):571-2. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.150.
4
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.未经评估,不得进行手术创新:IDEAL 建议
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.
5
Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine.比较效果研究:医学研究所的一份报告。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):203-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00125. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
6
Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).腹部大手术中中线切口与横切口的比较:一项随机、双盲等效性试验(POVATI:ISRCTN60734227)
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):913-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77c92.
7
Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus?择期手术中腹壁关闭的当前实践——是否存在共识?
BMC Surg. 2009 May 15;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-8.
8
A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)和经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)用于胆囊切除术的技术综述。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1733-40. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0902-y. Epub 2009 May 2.
9
Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).用于闭合初次择期腹部正中切口的间断或连续可缓慢吸收缝线:一项多中心随机试验(INSECT:ISRCTN24023541)
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):576-82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.
10
Antibacterial [corrected] coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection.腹部闭合缝线的抗菌[校正后]涂层与伤口感染
Surgery. 2009 Mar;145(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 25.