• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用美国国家家庭出行调查数据估计乘客特征对年轻驾驶员致命碰撞事故相对风险的影响。

Using the U.S. National Household Travel Survey to estimate the impact of passenger characteristics on young drivers' relative risk of fatal crash involvement.

机构信息

Prevention Research Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.017. Epub 2009 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.017
PMID:20159095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2824613/
Abstract

Motor vehicle crashes are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in teenagers and young adults in the United States. Driving exposure and passenger presence, which can both vary by driver and passenger characteristics, are known to influence crash risk. Some studies have accounted for driving exposure in calculating young driver fatal crash risk in the presence of passengers, but none have estimated crash risk by driver sex and passenger age and sex. One possible reason for this gap is that data collection on driving exposure often precludes appropriate analyses. The purpose of this study was to examine, per 10 million vehicle trips (VT) and vehicle-miles traveled (VMT), the relative risk of fatal crash involvement in 15-20-year-old male and female drivers as a function of their passenger's age and sex, using solo driving as the referent. The Fatality Analysis Reporting System provided fatal motor vehicle crash data from 1999 to 2003 and the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) provided VT and VMT. The NHTS collects driving exposure for both household and non-household members (e.g., friends, colleagues), but demographic characteristics only on household members. Missing age and sex of non-household passengers were imputed with hot deck using information from household passengers' trips with non-household drivers, thereby enabling the calculation of crash rate and relative risk estimates based upon driver and passenger characteristics. Using this approach, the highest risk was found for young male drivers with 16-20-year-old passengers (relative risk [RR] per 10 million VT=7.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.34-8.69; RR per 10 million VMT=9.94; 95% CI, 9.13-10.81). Relative risk was also high for 21-34-year-old passengers, again particularly when both drivers and passengers were male. These effects warrant further investigation and underscore the importance of considering driving exposure by passenger characteristics in understanding crash risk. Additionally, as all imputation techniques are imperfect, a more accurate estimation of U.S. fatal crash risk per distance driven would require national surveys to collect data on non-household passenger characteristics.

摘要

机动车事故是美国青少年和年轻人发病率和死亡率的主要原因。驾驶暴露和乘客存在,这两者都可以因驾驶员和乘客的特征而变化,已知会影响碰撞风险。一些研究已经考虑了驾驶暴露在计算有乘客存在的年轻驾驶员致命碰撞风险时的作用,但没有研究估计驾驶员性别和乘客年龄和性别对碰撞风险的影响。造成这种差距的一个可能原因是,驾驶暴露数据的收集往往排除了适当的分析。本研究的目的是检查每 1000 万车辆旅行(VT)和车辆行驶里程(VMT),15-20 岁男性和女性驾驶员的乘客年龄和性别对其致命碰撞事故的相对风险,以单独驾驶为参照。从 1999 年到 2003 年,致命事故分析报告系统(Fatality Analysis Reporting System)提供了致命机动车碰撞数据,2001 年全国家庭旅行调查(National Household Travel Survey,NHTS)提供了 VT 和 VMT。NHTS 收集了家庭和非家庭成员(如朋友、同事)的驾驶暴露情况,但仅收集了家庭成员的人口特征。非家庭乘客的年龄和性别缺失用热补(hot deck)法进行推断,使用来自家庭乘客与非家庭驾驶员的旅行信息,从而能够根据驾驶员和乘客特征计算碰撞率和相对风险估计。使用这种方法,发现年轻男性驾驶员载有 16-20 岁乘客的风险最高(每 1000 万 VT 的相对风险[RR]为 7.99;95%置信区间[CI],7.34-8.69;每 1000 万 VMT 的 RR 为 9.94;95%CI,9.13-10.81)。21-34 岁乘客的相对风险也很高,尤其是当驾驶员和乘客都是男性时。这些影响值得进一步调查,并强调在理解碰撞风险时,需要考虑乘客特征的驾驶暴露情况。此外,由于所有推断技术都不完善,要更准确地估计美国每行驶距离的致命碰撞风险,需要国家调查收集非家庭乘客特征的数据。

相似文献

1
Using the U.S. National Household Travel Survey to estimate the impact of passenger characteristics on young drivers' relative risk of fatal crash involvement.利用美国国家家庭出行调查数据估计乘客特征对年轻驾驶员致命碰撞事故相对风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.017. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
2
Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.2005-2008 年南卡罗来纳州青少年驾驶员单车事故特征分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.过去十年间青少年撞车风险的进展。
J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
4
Drivers with child passengers: distracted but cautious?有儿童乘客的驾驶员:注意力分散但谨慎?
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Tracking progress in teenage driver crash risk in the United States since the advent of graduated driver licensing programs.自分级驾驶员执照计划实施以来,追踪美国青少年驾驶员碰撞风险的进展情况。
J Safety Res. 2015 Jun;53:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
Why have fatality rates among older drivers declined? The relative contributions of changes in survivability and crash involvement.老年驾驶员的死亡率为何下降?生存能力变化和撞车事故发生率变化的相对影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
Comparison of teen driver fatality rates by vehicle type in the United States.美国不同车型的青少年驾驶员死亡率比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):850-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.038.
8
Young females at risk while driving with a small child.年轻女性在搭载小孩驾车时面临风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
9
Characteristics of teens-with-teens fatal crashes in the United States, 2005-2010.美国 2005-2010 年青少年与青少年致命车祸的特征。
J Safety Res. 2014 Feb;48:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
10
Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers.搭载乘客是导致16至17岁驾驶员致命撞车事故的一个风险因素。
JAMA. 2000;283(12):1578-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1578.

引用本文的文献

1
Treating chronic atrophic gastritis: identifying sub-population based on real-world TCM electronic medical records.治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎:基于真实世界中医电子病历识别亚组人群。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1444733. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1444733. eCollection 2024.
2
Identifying subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes based on real-world traditional chinese medicine electronic medical records.基于真实世界中医电子病历识别2型糖尿病患者亚组。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1210667. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1210667. eCollection 2023.
3
Using the Symptom Patient Similarity Network to Explore the Difference between the Chinese and Western Medicine Pathways of Ischemic Stroke and its Comorbidities.利用症状-患者相似性网络探索缺血性中风及其合并症中西医治疗途径的差异。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Dec 1;2021:4961738. doi: 10.1155/2021/4961738. eCollection 2021.
4
Riding with an impaired driver and driving while impaired among adolescents: Longitudinal trajectories and their characteristics.青少年乘坐酒驾司机驾驶的车辆以及自身酒驾情况:纵向轨迹及其特征
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(5):337-342. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1910244. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Risk Taking by Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a Behavioral and Psychophysiological Investigation of Peer Influence.注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)青少年的冒险行为:同伴影响的行为和心理生理学研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;48(9):1129-1141. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00666-z.
6
Investigating traffic fatality trends and restraint use among rear-seat passengers in the United States, 2000-2016.调查 2000-2016 年美国后座乘客交通死亡趋势和约束装置使用情况。
J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
7
Comparing distance and time as driving exposure measures to evaluate fatal crash risk ratios.比较距离和时间作为驾驶暴露测量指标,以评估致命碰撞风险比。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105576. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105576. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
The Effect of Teenage Passengers on Simulated Risky Driving Among Teenagers: A Randomized Trial.青少年乘客对青少年模拟危险驾驶的影响:一项随机试验。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 30;10:923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00923. eCollection 2019.
9
Global brain dynamics during social exclusion predict subsequent behavioral conformity.社会排斥期间的全球大脑动力学可预测随后的行为从众。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):182-191. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy007.
10
Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors.青少年分心驾驶行为:流行率和预测因素。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Young drivers--reduced crash risk with passengers in the vehicle.年轻驾驶员——车内有乘客时撞车风险降低。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
2
Developmental changes in gender composition of friendship networks in adolescent girls and boys.青少年女孩和男孩友谊网络中性别构成的发展变化。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1484-1496. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1484.
3
Child passenger injury risk in sibling versus non-sibling teen driver crashes: a US study.美国一项关于同胞青少年驾驶员与非同胞青少年驾驶员撞车事故中儿童乘客受伤风险的研究。
Inj Prev. 2007 Jun;13(3):207-10. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.014332.
4
Difficulties with quasi-induced exposure when speed varies systematically by vehicle type.当速度因车辆类型而系统变化时,准诱导暴露存在困难。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jul;39(4):649-56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
5
The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers.青少年乘客对青少年驾驶员危险驾驶行为的观察效果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):973-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014.
6
The influence of passengers on older drivers involved in fatal crashes.乘客对涉及致命车祸的老年驾驶员的影响。
Exp Aging Res. 2004 Apr-Jun;30(2):205-15. doi: 10.1080/03610730490275111.
7
The influence of passengers on the risk of the driver causing a car collision in Spain. Analysis of collisions from 1990 to 1999.乘客对西班牙司机引发汽车碰撞风险的影响。1990年至1999年碰撞事故分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2004 May;36(3):481-9. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00043-5.
8
Responsibility of drivers, by age and gender, for motor-vehicle crash deaths.按年龄和性别划分的机动车碰撞死亡事故中驾驶员的责任。
J Safety Res. 2003;34(5):527-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.001.
9
Factors associated with young drivers' car crash injury: comparisons among learner, provisional, and full licensees.与年轻驾驶员车祸受伤相关的因素:学习者、临时驾照持有者和正式驾照持有者之间的比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Nov;35(6):913-20. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00099-4.
10
Use of the mean, hot deck and multiple imputation techniques to predict outcome in intensive care unit patients in Colombia.使用均值、热卡填充法和多重填补技术预测哥伦比亚重症监护病房患者的预后。
Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3885-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.1391.