• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶员之间的比较乐观主义:代际画像。

Comparative optimism among drivers: an intergenerational portrait.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 145 Jean-Jacques Lussier Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):734-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.001
PMID:20159101
Abstract

We describe a large cross-sectional study examining comparative optimism (CO) regarding the risk of car crash in three age cohorts (17-26, 27-64, 65 and older). The participants completed a questionnaire in which they were asked to indicate their personal risk of being in an at-fault crash over nine driving related events in comparison to young drivers, mid-aged drivers, and older drivers. The results indicated that all three age groups exhibited CO, but that the level varied according to the age group on which they had to base their comparative judgment. Interestingly, greater CO was constantly observed when the three age groups compared themselves to older drivers. Also, young males exhibited greater CO than female of the same age group.

摘要

我们描述了一项大型的横断面研究,该研究考察了三个年龄组(17-26 岁、27-64 岁和 65 岁及以上)在车祸风险方面的相对乐观程度(CO)。参与者完成了一份问卷,其中他们被要求在九项与驾驶相关的事件中,就个人发生事故责任的风险与年轻司机、中年司机和老年司机进行比较。结果表明,所有三个年龄组都表现出了 CO,但他们的相对判断依据的年龄组不同,其水平也不同。有趣的是,当这三个年龄组将自己与老年司机进行比较时,CO 程度更高。此外,年轻男性比同年龄组的女性表现出更大的 CO。

相似文献

1
Comparative optimism among drivers: an intergenerational portrait.驾驶员之间的比较乐观主义:代际画像。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):734-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
Young drivers' optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill: Accountability and insight experience manipulations.年轻驾驶员对事故风险和驾驶技能的乐观偏差:责任和洞察力经验的操纵。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
3
Self-enhancement, crash-risk optimism and the impact of safety advertisements on young drivers.自我提升、碰撞风险乐观主义以及安全广告对年轻驾驶员的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2005 May;96(Pt 2):215-30. doi: 10.1348/000712605X36019.
4
Are drivers' comparative risk judgments about speeding realistic?驾驶员对超速的相对风险判断是否现实?
J Safety Res. 2009 Oct;40(5):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
5
Risks older drivers pose to themselves and to other road users.年长驾驶员对自身及其他道路使用者构成的风险。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(6):577-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
6
[The elderly driver's perception of risk: do older drivers still express comparative optimism? ].[老年驾驶员的风险认知:老年驾驶员是否仍表现出相对乐观的态度?]
Can J Aging. 2008 Summer;27(2):159-67. doi: 10.3138/cja.27.2.159.
7
Aberrant driving behaviors: a study of drivers in Beijing.异常驾驶行为:对北京驾驶员的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
8
Driving styles among young novice drivers--the contribution of parental driving styles and personal characteristics.年轻新手驾驶员的驾驶风格——父母驾驶风格和个人特征的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):558-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.024. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
9
Risk to self versus risk to others: how do older drivers compare to others on the road?对自身的风险与对他人的风险:老年驾驶员在道路上与其他驾驶员相比情况如何?
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Apr;26(3):217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.021.
10
Subjective and predicted sleepiness while driving in young adults.年轻人驾车时的主观困倦感及预测的困倦感。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1066-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.008. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
How Optimism Bias and Safety Climate Influence the Risk-Taking Behavior of Construction Workers.乐观偏差和安全氛围如何影响建筑工人的冒险行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031243.
2
"The closer you get …": age, attitudes and self-serving evaluations about older drivers.“你越接近……”:年龄、态度以及对老年驾驶员的自利评价
Eur J Ageing. 2015 May 24;12(3):229-238. doi: 10.1007/s10433-015-0337-0. eCollection 2015 Sep.
3
The Cognitive and Psychological Factors (Personality, Driving Behavior, and Mental Illnesses) As Predictors in Traffic Violations.
作为交通违规预测因素的认知和心理因素(人格、驾驶行为和精神疾病)
Iran J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;12(2):78-86.
4
Personality, Driving Behavior and Mental Disorders Factors as Predictors of Road Traffic Accidents Based on Logistic Regression.基于逻辑回归的人格、驾驶行为和精神障碍因素作为道路交通事故的预测指标
Iran J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;42(1):24-31.
5
Iranian Version of Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ): Psychometric ‎Properties.《曼彻斯特驾驶行为问卷》(MDBQ)伊朗版:心理测量特性。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;11(1):37-42.