• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高用于估计具有不完整数据的总体均值的双重稳健估计量的效率和稳健性。

Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

作者信息

Cao Weihua, Tsiatis Anastasios A, Davidian Marie

机构信息

Department of Statistics , North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8203 , U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrika. 2009 Sep;96(3):723-734. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asp033. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1093/biomet/asp033
PMID:20161511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2798744/
Abstract

Considerable recent interest has focused on doubly robust estimators for a population mean response in the presence of incomplete data, which involve models for both the propensity score and the regression of outcome on covariates. The usual doubly robust estimator may yield severely biased inferences if neither of these models is correctly specified and can exhibit nonnegligible bias if the estimated propensity score is close to zero for some observations. We propose alternative doubly robust estimators that achieve comparable or improved performance relative to existing methods, even with some estimated propensity scores close to zero.

摘要

最近,相当多的关注集中在存在不完整数据时总体平均响应的双稳健估计量上,这涉及倾向得分模型和结果对协变量的回归模型。如果这两个模型都未正确设定,通常的双稳健估计量可能会产生严重有偏的推断,并且如果某些观测值的估计倾向得分接近零,可能会表现出不可忽略的偏差。我们提出了替代的双稳健估计量,即使某些估计倾向得分接近零,相对于现有方法也能实现相当或更好的性能。

相似文献

1
Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.提高用于估计具有不完整数据的总体均值的双重稳健估计量的效率和稳健性。
Biometrika. 2009 Sep;96(3):723-734. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asp033. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
2
Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.平均因果效应的分层双稳健估计量。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):270-7. doi: 10.1111/biom.12157. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
4
Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.数据自适应偏差减少的双重稳健估计
Int J Biostat. 2016 May 1;12(1):253-82. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0029.
5
Improved doubly robust estimation in learning optimal individualized treatment rules.学习最优个体化治疗规则中的改进双稳健估计
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):283-294. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1725522. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.机器学习结果回归改进了平均因果效应的双重稳健估计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1120-1133. doi: 10.1002/pds.5074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.倾向评分加权加上比例风险模型中的调整不是双重稳健的。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae069.
9
Improved doubly robust estimation when data are monotonely coarsened, with application to longitudinal studies with dropout.数据单调粗化时改进的双重稳健估计及其在有失访的纵向研究中的应用
Biometrics. 2011 Jun;67(2):536-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01476.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
10
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced doubly robust estimation with concave link functions for estimands in clinical trials.用于临床试验中估计量的具有凹链接函数的增强双稳健估计。
J Nonparametr Stat. 2024 Mar 12. doi: 10.1080/10485252.2024.2328078.
2
Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are.非参数识别是不够的,但随机对照试验是足够的。
Obs Stud. 2025 Apr 11;11(1):3-16. doi: 10.1353/obs.2025.a956837. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving randomized controlled trial analysis via data-adaptive borrowing.通过数据自适应借用改进随机对照试验分析。
Biometrika. 2024 Dec 17;112(2):asae069. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asae069. eCollection 2025.
4
A semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for causal inference.一种用于因果推断的半参数多重稳健多重填补方法。
Metrika. 2023 Jul;86(5):517-542. doi: 10.1007/s00184-022-00883-0. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Mediation analysis using incomplete information from publicly available data sources.基于公开数据源的不完全信息进行中介分析。
Stat Med. 2024 Jun 30;43(14):2695-2712. doi: 10.1002/sim.10076. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
6
Matching on Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Exposures.基于广义倾向得分匹配连续暴露因素
J Am Stat Assoc. 2024;119(545):757-772. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2144737. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
An improved multiply robust estimator for the average treatment effect.一种改进的平均处理效应的多重稳健估计量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02056-7.
8
A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications.环境与流行病学应用中的空间因果推断方法综述
Int Stat Rev. 2021 Dec;89(3):605-634. doi: 10.1111/insr.12452. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Risk Minimization from Adaptively Collected Data: Guarantees for Supervised and Policy Learning.自适应收集数据的风险最小化:监督学习与策略学习的保障
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2021 Dec;34:19261-19273.
10
Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.模型误设定和平均因果效应逆概率加权估计的偏差。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100118. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100118. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.评论:揭开双重稳健性的神秘面纱:从不完整数据估计总体均值的替代策略比较。
Stat Sci. 2007;22(4):569-573. doi: 10.1214/07-STS227.
2
Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.缺失数据与因果推断模型中的双重稳健估计
Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):962-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.
3
Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.在因果治疗效果估计中通过倾向得分进行分层和加权:一项比较研究。
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 15;23(19):2937-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.1903.
4
Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.边缘结构模型与流行病学中的因果推断
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011.
5
Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.使用估计倾向得分进行匹配:理论与实践的关联
Biometrics. 1996 Mar;52(1):249-64.