Daher Nancy, Saleh Rawad, Jaroudi Ezzat, Sheheitli Hiba, Badr Thérèse, Sepetdjian Elizabeth, Al Rashidi Mariam, Saliba Najat, Shihadeh Alan
Aerosol Research Lab, Mechanical Engineering Department, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Atmos Environ (1994). 2010 Jan 1;44(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.004.
The lack of scientific evidence on the constituents, properties, and health effects of second-hand waterpipe smoke has fueled controversy over whether public smoking bans should include the waterpipe. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare emissions of ultrafine particles (UFP, <100 nm), carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), volatile aldehydes, and carbon monoxide (CO) for cigarettes and narghile (shisha, hookah) waterpipes. These smoke constituents are associated with a variety of cancers, and heart and pulmonary diseases, and span the volatility range found in tobacco smoke.Sidestream cigarette and waterpipe smoke was captured and aged in a 1 m(3) Teflon-coated chamber operating at 1.5 air changes per hour (ACH). The chamber was characterized for particle mass and number surface deposition rates. UFP and CO concentrations were measured online using a fast particle spectrometer (TSI 3090 Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer), and an indoor air quality monitor. Particulate PAH and gaseous volatile aldehydes were captured on glass fiber filters and DNPH-coated SPE cartridges, respectively, and analyzed off-line using GC-MS and HPLC-MS. PAH compounds quantified were the 5- and 6-ring compounds of the EPA priority list. Measured aldehydes consisted of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, methacrolein, and propionaldehyde.We found that a single waterpipe use session emits in the sidestream smoke approximately four times the carcinogenic PAH, four times the volatile aldehydes, and 30 times the CO of a single cigarette. Accounting for exhaled mainstream smoke, and given a habitual smoker smoking rate of 2 cigarettes per hour, during a typical one-hour waterpipe use session a waterpipe smoker likely generates ambient carcinogens and toxicants equivalent to 2-10 cigarette smokers, depending on the compound in question. There is therefore good reason to include waterpipe tobacco smoking in public smoking bans.
二手水烟烟雾的成分、特性及健康影响缺乏科学证据,这引发了关于公共场所吸烟禁令是否应涵盖水烟的争议。本研究的目的是调查并比较香烟与纳吉勒水烟(又称水烟袋、水烟筒)中超细颗粒物(UFP,<100纳米)、致癌多环芳烃(PAH)、挥发性醛类和一氧化碳(CO)的排放量。这些烟雾成分与多种癌症、心脏和肺部疾病相关,涵盖了烟草烟雾中的挥发性范围。
侧流香烟烟雾和水烟烟雾在一个1立方米的涂有特氟龙的腔室内被捕获并老化,该腔室每小时换气1.5次(ACH)。对该腔室的颗粒物质量和数量表面沉积速率进行了表征。使用快速粒子光谱仪(TSI 3090发动机尾气颗粒粒度分析仪)和室内空气质量监测仪在线测量UFP和CO浓度。颗粒态PAH和气态挥发性醛类分别被捕集在玻璃纤维滤膜和涂有2,4 - 二硝基苯肼(DNPH)的固相萃取柱上,并使用气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GC - MS)和高效液相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(HPLC - MS)进行离线分析。定量分析的PAH化合物为美国环境保护局(EPA)优先清单中的五环和六环化合物。测得的醛类包括甲醛、乙醛、丙烯醛、甲基丙烯醛和丙醛。
我们发现,单次水烟使用过程中,侧流烟雾中排放的致癌PAH约为单支香烟的四倍,挥发性醛类约为四倍,CO约为30倍。考虑到呼出的主流烟雾,假设习惯性吸烟者每小时吸2支香烟,在典型的一小时水烟使用过程中,水烟吸食者产生的环境致癌物和毒物相当于2至10名吸烟者,具体取决于所讨论的化合物。因此,有充分理由将水烟吸食纳入公共场所吸烟禁令。