PET Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1643-52. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20964.
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of several psychiatric illnesses including major depressive disorder and schizophrenia. In this regard, the DLPFC has been targeted in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies as a form of treatment to those patients who are resistant to medications. The '5-cm method' and the '10-20 method' for positioning the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over DLPFC have been scrutinised due to poor targeting accuracies attributed to inter-subject variability. We evaluated the accuracy of such methods to localise the DLPFC on the scalp in 15 healthy subjects and compared them with our novel neuronavigational method, which first estimates the DLPFC position in the cortex based on a standard template and then determines the most appropriate position on the scalp in which to place the TMS coil. Our neuronavigational method yielded a scalp position for the left DLPFC between electrodes F3 and F5 in standard space and was closest to electrode F5 in individual space. Further, we found that there was significantly less inter-subject variability using our neuronavigational method for localising the DLPFC on the scalp compared with the '5-cm method' and the '10-20 method'. Our findings also suggest that the '10-20 method' is superior to the '5-cm method' in reducing inter-subject variability and that electrode F5 should be the stimulation location of choice when MRI co-registration is not available.
背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)与包括重度抑郁症和精神分裂症在内的多种精神疾病的病理生理学有关。在这方面,DLPFC 已成为重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)研究的目标,作为对那些对药物治疗有抵抗力的患者的一种治疗方法。由于与个体间变异性相关的靶向精度差,因此对用于在 DLPFC 上定位经颅磁刺激(TMS)线圈的“5 厘米法”和“10-20 法”进行了审查。我们评估了这两种方法在 15 名健康受试者头皮上定位 DLPFC 的准确性,并将其与我们的新型神经导航方法进行了比较,该方法首先根据标准模板估算 DLPFC 在皮质中的位置,然后确定在头皮上放置 TMS 线圈的最合适位置。我们的神经导航方法在标准空间中产生了左 DLPFC 在电极 F3 和 F5 之间的头皮位置,并且在个体空间中最接近电极 F5。此外,我们发现,与“5 厘米法”和“10-20 法”相比,使用我们的神经导航方法对头皮上的 DLPFC 进行定位,个体间变异性明显更小。我们的研究结果还表明,在减少个体间变异性方面,“10-20 法”优于“5 厘米法”,并且当没有 MRI 配准时,电极 F5 应该是首选的刺激位置。