• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于引发光变应性接触性皮炎的既往和新兴过敏原的 20 年分析。

A 20-year analysis of previous and emerging allergens that elicit photoallergic contact dermatitis.

机构信息

Charles C. Harris Skin and Cancer Pavilion, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Apr;62(4):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.084. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.084
PMID:20163891
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retrospective chart reviews are periodically needed to update allergen series to detect changes in photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) over time.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate photopatch test results during a 13-year period and extend the observations to 20 years.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted in patients who were photopatch tested.

RESULTS

In all, 76 patients were evaluated. A total of 69 positive photopatch and 45 positive patch test reactions were detected in 30 and 23 patients, respectively. The frequencies of the positive photopatch test reactions were sunscreens 23.2%, antimicrobial agents 23.2%, medications 20.3%, fragrances 13%, plants and plant derivatives 11.6%, and pesticides 8.7%. Of the positive photopatch reactions to antimicrobial agents, 60% were caused by Fentichlor.

LIMITATIONS

This study was a retrospective chart analysis, and the number of patients was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Sunscreens and antimicrobial agents were the most frequent allergens eliciting PACD, and there was a decrease in PACD caused by fragrances. The number of reactions to medications increased. This study also demonstrated that pesticides can be a cause of PACD. The detection of reactions to Fentichlor was unexpected and, although they have been attributed in some studies to cross-reactions to sulfanilamides and bithionol, such a robust association was not observed in this study. This study extends our experience of the changes in the allergens that elicit PACD to 20 years.

摘要

背景

为了检测光变应性接触性皮炎(PACD)随时间的变化,需要定期进行回顾性图表审查以更新过敏原系列。

目的

我们旨在评估 13 年期间的光斑贴试验结果,并将观察结果延长至 20 年。

方法

对接受光斑贴试验的患者进行回顾性图表审查。

结果

共评估了 76 例患者。在 30 例和 23 例患者中分别检测到 69 例和 45 例阳性光斑贴和斑贴试验反应。阳性光斑贴试验反应的频率为防晒霜 23.2%、抗菌剂 23.2%、药物 20.3%、香料 13%、植物和植物衍生物 11.6%和杀虫剂 8.7%。抗菌剂引起的阳性光斑贴反应中,有 60%是由非氯苯氧氯酚引起的。

局限性

本研究为回顾性图表分析,患者数量较少。

结论

防晒霜和抗菌剂是引起 PACD 的最常见过敏原,而香料引起的 PACD 减少。药物引起的反应数量增加。本研究还表明,杀虫剂也可能是 PACD 的原因。检测到非氯苯氧氯酚的反应出乎意料,尽管在一些研究中归因于磺胺类和双硫仑的交叉反应,但在本研究中未观察到这种强关联。本研究将我们对引起 PACD 的过敏原变化的经验延长至 20 年。

相似文献

1
A 20-year analysis of previous and emerging allergens that elicit photoallergic contact dermatitis.一项关于引发光变应性接触性皮炎的既往和新兴过敏原的 20 年分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Apr;62(4):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.084. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
2
Causal agents of photoallergic contact dermatitis diagnosed in the national institute of dermatology of Colombia.在哥伦比亚国家皮肤病研究所诊断出的光变应性接触性皮炎的致病因子。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006 Aug;22(4):189-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2006.00212.x.
3
Photopatch tests: an Italian multicentre study from 2004 to 2006.光斑贴试验:一项2004年至2006年的意大利多中心研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Aug;59(2):103-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01374.x.
4
Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis: a 10-year experience.变应性和光变应性接触性皮炎:10 年经验。
Dermatitis. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):29-32. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31827edc8b.
5
Octocrylene, an emerging photoallergen.二乙氨羟苯甲酰基苯甲酸己酯,一种新出现的光变应原。
Arch Dermatol. 2010 Jul;146(7):753-7. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.132.
6
Photopatch Testing in Chinese Patients Over 10 Years.10年来中国患者的光斑贴试验
Dermatitis. 2016 May-Jun;27(3):137-42. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000170.
7
Retrospective study of photopatch testing in a Chinese population during a 7-year period.7 年期间中国人群光变应原检测的回顾性研究。
Dermatitis. 2014 Jan-Feb;25(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000008.
8
A European multicentre photopatch test study.一项欧洲多中心光贴试验研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 May;166(5):1002-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10857.x.
9
Photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen in southern Sweden.瑞典南部酮洛芬引起的光变应性接触性皮炎。
Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Mar;54(3):150-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00778.x.
10
Visible light photopatch testing of common photocontactants in female filipino adults with and without melasma: a cross-sectional study.有和无黄褐斑的成年菲律宾女性中常见光接触剂的可见光光斑贴试验:一项横断面研究
J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Feb;7(2):149-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical Sunscreens: A Narrative Review for Contact Sensitivity, Potential Allergens, Clinical Evaluation, and Management for their Optimal Use in Clinical Practice.外用防晒霜:关于接触性敏感、潜在过敏原、临床评估以及在临床实践中优化使用管理的叙述性综述
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2024 Oct 28;15(6):920-929. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_111_24. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
2
Variable Presentations of Photodermatoses - A Case Series.光皮肤病的多种表现——病例系列
Indian J Dermatol. 2023 Nov-Dec;68(6):686-689. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_542_23. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
Sunscreens and their usefulness: have we made any progress in the last two decades?
防晒霜及其功效:在过去的二十年里,我们有取得任何进展吗?
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2021 Feb;20(2):189-244. doi: 10.1007/s43630-021-00013-1. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Epidemiology of drug hypersensitivity reactions using 6-year national health insurance claim data from Korea.利用韩国6年的国民健康保险理赔数据研究药物过敏反应的流行病学。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1359-1371. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0625-9. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Photodermatitis for the Allergist.过敏专科医生眼中的光皮炎
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Jun;17(6):36. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0705-2.
6
Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis.光敏性皮炎的光斑贴试验和紫外线照射斑贴试验
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016 Jan-Feb;7(1):12-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.174319.
7
Brazilian consensus on photoprotection.巴西光防护共识。
An Bras Dermatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;89(6 Suppl 1):1-74. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143971.