Top Institute FoodNutrition Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):841-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28360. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
An important question in the regulation of energy intake is whether dietary learning of energy content depends on the food's characteristics, such as texture. Texture might affect the duration of sensory exposure and eating rate.
The objective was to investigate whether a long sensory exposure, due to differences in means of consumption and in viscosity, enhances learned associations between sensory signals and metabolic consequences and hence facilitates energy intake compensation.
A total of 105 healthy young adults with a mean (+/-SD) age of 22 +/- 3 y and a body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 21.6 +/- 1.7 participated in a parallel intervention in 3 groups: liquid yogurt with a straw (liquid/straw; n = 34), liquid yogurt with a spoon (liquid/spoon; n = 36), or semisolid yogurt with a spoon (semisolid/spoon; n = 35). Novel flavored yogurts were offered ad libitum for breakfast in 2 energy densities: low ( approximately 215 kJ/100 g) and high ( approximately 600 kJ/100 g). Subjects were repeatedly exposed to the yogurt products (10 times), and yogurt intake was measured.
Intakes (P = 0.01) and eating rates (P = 0.01) were highest in the liquid/straw group. Average intakes over 10 exposures were 575 +/- 260 g for liquid/straw, 475 +/- 192 g for liquid/spoon, and 470 +/- 223 g for semisolid/spoon; average eating rates were 132 +/- 83 g/min for liquid/straw, 106 +/- 53 g/min for liquid/spoon, and 105 +/- 88 g/min for semisolid/spoon. No significant interaction for intake between intervention group, energy density, and repeated exposure was observed, and intakes of the low- and high-energy-dense yogurts did not change over time in any of the intervention groups.
We observed no energy intake compensation after repeated exposure to yogurt products. Differences in ad libitum yogurt intake could be explained by eating rate, which was affected by the different means of consumption. This trial was registered with the Dutch trial registration at http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=1853 as NTR1853.
能量摄入调节中的一个重要问题是,饮食对能量含量的学习是否取决于食物的特性,如质地。质地可能会影响感官暴露的持续时间和进食速度。
本研究旨在探讨由于摄入方式和粘度的差异导致的较长时间的感官暴露是否会增强感官信号与代谢后果之间的习得关联,从而促进能量摄入补偿。
共有 105 名健康的年轻成年人参与了 3 组平行干预,平均(+/-SD)年龄为 22 +/- 3 岁,体重指数(kg/m2)为 21.6 +/- 1.7:吸管饮用的液体酸奶(液体/吸管组,n = 34)、勺匙饮用的液体酸奶(液体/勺匙组,n = 36)或勺匙食用的半固体酸奶(半固体/勺匙组,n = 35)。在 2 种不同的能量密度下(分别约为 215 kJ/100 g 和 600 kJ/100 g),早餐时自由摄入新型调味酸奶。受试者反复暴露于酸奶产品(10 次),并测量酸奶摄入量。
液体/吸管组的摄入量(P = 0.01)和进食速度(P = 0.01)最高。10 次暴露后的平均摄入量分别为:液体/吸管组 575 +/- 260 g、液体/勺匙组 475 +/- 192 g、半固体/勺匙组 470 +/- 223 g;液体/吸管组的平均进食速度为 132 +/- 83 g/min、液体/勺匙组为 106 +/- 53 g/min、半固体/勺匙组为 105 +/- 88 g/min。在干预组、能量密度和重复暴露之间,没有观察到摄入量的显著交互作用,并且在任何干预组中,低和高能量密度酸奶的摄入量都没有随时间变化而改变。
我们在反复暴露于酸奶产品后没有观察到能量摄入补偿。自由摄入酸奶量的差异可以用进食速度来解释,而进食速度又受到不同摄入方式的影响。本研究在荷兰临床试验注册中心(http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=1853)进行了注册,注册号为 NTR1853。