Suppr超能文献

评估计算机辅助策略在教授医学生产前超声诊断技能中的应用。

Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills.

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2008 Sep 24;13:13. doi: 10.3885/meo.2008.Res00275.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether computer-based learning (CBL) improves newly acquired knowledge and is an effective strategy for teaching prenatal ultrasound diagnostic skills to third-year medical students when compared with instruction by traditional paper-based methods (PBM).

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, prospective study involving volunteer junior (3(rd) year) medical students consecutively rotating through the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship during six months of the 2005-2006 academic year. The students were randomly assigned to permuted blocks and divided into two groups. Half of the participants received instruction in prenatal ultrasound diagnostics using an interactive CBL program; the other half received instruction using equivalent material by the traditional PBM. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing changes in pre-tutorial and post instruction examination scores.

RESULTS

All 36 potential participants (100%) completed the study curriculum. Students were divided equally between the CBL (n = 18) and PBM (n = 18) groups. Pre-tutorial exam scores (mean+/-s.d.) were 44%+/-11.1% for the CBL group and 44%+/-10.8% for the PBL cohort, indicating no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups. After instruction, post-tutorial exam scores (mean+/-s.d.) were increased from the pre-tutorial scores, 74%+/-11% and 67%+/-12%, for students in the CBL and the PBM groups, respectively. The improvement in post-tutorial exam scores from the pre-test scores was considered significant (p<0.05). When post-test scores for the tutorial groups were compared, the CBL subjects achieved a score that was, on average, 7 percentage points higher than their PBM counterparts, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Instruction by either CBL or PBM strategies is associated with improvements in newly acquired knowledge as reflected by increased post-tutorial examination scores. Students that received CBL had significantlyhigher post-tutorial exam scores than those in the PBM group, indicating that CBL is an effective instruction strategy in this setting.

摘要

目的

评估计算机辅助学习(CBL)是否比传统的基于纸张的教学方法(PBM)更能有效地教授医学生产前超声诊断技能,从而提高新获得的知识。

研究设计

我们进行了一项随机、前瞻性研究,涉及 2005-2006 学年六个月期间连续轮转妇产科实习的志愿三年级医学生(初级)。学生被随机分配到排列块中,并分为两组。一半的参与者接受使用交互式 CBL 程序的产前超声诊断教学;另一半接受传统 PBM 等效材料的教学。通过比较课前考试和课后考试成绩的变化来评估结果。

结果

所有 36 名潜在参与者(100%)都完成了研究课程。学生平均分为 CBL(n=18)和 PBM(n=18)两组。课前考试成绩(平均值+/-标准差)分别为 CBL 组的 44%+/-11.1%和 PBL 队列的 44%+/-10.8%,两组之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。经过指导后,课后考试成绩(平均值+/-标准差)分别从课前考试成绩增加了 74%+/-11%和 67%+/-12%,CBL 和 PBM 组的学生。从预测试成绩来看,课后考试成绩的提高被认为是显著的(p<0.05)。当比较教程组的课后成绩时,CBL 组的学生平均比他们的 PBM 组的学生高 7 个百分点,这是一个统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

无论是 CBL 还是 PBM 策略的指导都与新获得的知识的提高有关,这反映在增加的课后考试成绩中。接受 CBL 的学生的课后考试成绩明显高于 PBM 组,表明 CBL 是这种情况下有效的教学策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf2b/2779600/10d460fe70bf/MEO-13-0275-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验