Grover S, Garg B, Sood N
Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
J Postgrad Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;66(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_2_19.
The present study was carried out for comparative evaluation of case-based learning (CBL) aided with WhatsApp and didactic lectures (DL) while teaching a pathology topic to second-year medical students. In addition, the acceptability of WhatsApp as an aid to CBL was assessed.
After obtaining informed consent, 70 second-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students were exposed to six sessions of CBL aided by case scenarios for one set of topics of anemia posted on WhatsApp groups. This was followed by six sessions of DL for separate set of topics in anemia. The multiple-choice questions (MCQ) test scores obtained pre and postintervention, of CBL and DL sessions, were compared to paired t-test (within the groups) and Student's t-test (between the groups). Categorical data were analyzed using Chi-square (χ) test. Student's self-administered questionnaires and focus group discussions (FGDs) were used to collect student perceptions and analyzed quantitatively, as well as qualitatively.
The mean MCQ scores obtained postintervention in CBL topics were significantly higher compared to DL (22.78 ± 2.99 vs 17.78 ± 3.35; P < 0.001). Students perceived that CBL enhanced their curiosity; hence, the acquired knowledge through various resources was retained better. It enhanced their analytical skills and interest in learning pathology. In FGDs, the students appreciated the use of WhatsApp as an aid to CBL for its ease of sharing scenario-related additional information and prior discussions among themselves in chat groups at their convenience.
CBL aided by WhatsApp helped students acquire knowledge, discuss and learn actively, score more, and retain better than DL. Using WhatsApp as a platform helped them to interact at their ease and seek guidance from their mentors without resistance and hesitation.
本研究旨在对在向二年级医学生讲授病理学主题时,基于WhatsApp辅助的案例式学习(CBL)和理论讲授(DL)进行比较评估。此外,还评估了WhatsApp作为CBL辅助工具的可接受性。
在获得知情同意后,70名二年级医学学士和外科学士(MBBS)学生接触了六次基于WhatsApp群组中发布的一组贫血主题案例情景辅助的CBL课程。随后,针对另一组贫血主题进行了六次DL课程。将CBL和DL课程干预前后获得的多项选择题(MCQ)测试成绩进行配对t检验(组内)和学生t检验(组间)比较。分类数据采用卡方(χ)检验进行分析。使用学生自行填写的问卷和焦点小组讨论(FGD)来收集学生的看法,并进行定量和定性分析。
CBL主题干预后的平均MCQ成绩显著高于DL(22.78±2.99对17.78±3.35;P<0.001)。学生们认为CBL增强了他们的好奇心;因此,通过各种资源获取的知识保留得更好。它提高了他们的分析能力和对病理学学习的兴趣。在FGD中,学生们赞赏使用WhatsApp作为CBL的辅助工具,因为它便于在聊天群组中轻松分享与情景相关的额外信息以及他们之间事先的讨论。
WhatsApp辅助的CBL帮助学生获取知识、积极讨论和学习、取得更高分数并且比DL保留得更好。使用WhatsApp作为平台帮助他们轻松互动,并毫无阻力和犹豫地向导师寻求指导。