• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.前列腺癌管理中根治性前列腺切除术手术和病理质量绩效优化指南:循证基础
Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Feb;4(1):13-25. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.08105.
2
Cancer Care Ontario Guidelines for radical prostatectomy: striving for continuous quality improvement in community practice.安大略癌症护理中心根治性前列腺切除术指南:致力于社区实践中的持续质量改进
Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Dec;6(6):442-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.10195.
3
Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.根据最近德国前列腺癌 S3 指南,对接受开腹经耻骨后与腹腔镜或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的指南依从性进行多中心评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2195-9. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
4
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
5
Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.南加州凯撒医疗集团的根治性前列腺切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术:15年经验
Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-233.
6
Nodal counts during pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: an objective indicator of quality under the influence of very subjective factors.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术中的淋巴结计数:受非常主观因素影响的质量客观指标。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10610.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
7
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
8
Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification.根据美国国立综合癌症网络盆腔淋巴结清扫指南和达米科淋巴结侵犯风险分层,遵循盆腔淋巴结清扫建议。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):81.e17-81.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术:疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
10
The role of radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in lymph node-positive prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结清扫术在淋巴结阳性前列腺癌中的作用:文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.推进微创肝胆胰手术:采用障碍和公平获取。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5643-5650. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与局限性前列腺癌的延迟治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3.
3
Are urologic surgeons performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at the University of Alberta meeting surgical quality performance benchmarks? The PROCURE-02 quality assurance study.阿尔伯塔大学的泌尿外科医生在进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时是否达到了手术质量绩效基准?PROCURE - 02质量保证研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Aug;14(8):E369-E372. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6292.
4
The effect of surgery report cards on improving radical prostatectomy quality: the SuRep study protocol.手术报告卡对提高根治性前列腺切除术质量的影响:SuRep研究方案。
BMC Urol. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0403-y.
5
Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland.前列腺癌临床癌症护理质量指标:瑞士南部的一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4604-2.
6
Association between Allogeneic or Autologous Blood Transfusion and Survival in Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.异体或自体输血与前列腺癌根治术后患者生存之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0171081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171081. eCollection 2017.
7
Physician level reporting of surgical and pathology performance indicators: a regional study to assess feasibility and impact on quality.外科和病理学绩效指标的医师报告:一项评估可行性和对质量影响的区域研究。
Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):31-40. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004314.
8
Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases: The largest Canadian 5-year experience.722例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的肿瘤学和功能结果:加拿大最大规模的5年经验。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 May;8(5-6):195-201. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2016.
9
No impact of blood transfusion on oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.输血对前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤学结局无影响。
World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1351-0. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
Reporting the Canadian robotic experience: The outcomes and how we report them.报告加拿大的机器人手术经验:结果以及我们如何报告这些结果。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(9-10):333-4. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1689.

本文引用的文献

1
The changing age distribution of prostate cancer in Canada.加拿大前列腺癌患者年龄分布的变化情况。
Can J Public Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;98(1):60-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03405387.
2
Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.前列腺癌根治术时行有限盆腔淋巴结清扫术不影响低、中、高危前列腺癌的5年失败率:CaPSURE研究结果
J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):526-29; discussion 529-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.053.
3
Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2006 Dec;98(6):1199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06563.x.
4
Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术相关的并发症及其他手术结果
Eur Urol. 2006 Nov;50(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.015. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
5
Trends in prostate cancer incidence, hospital utilization and surgical procedures, Canada, 1981-2000.1981 - 2000年加拿大前列腺癌发病率、医院利用率及外科手术趋势
Can J Public Health. 2006 May-Jun;97(3):177-82. doi: 10.1007/BF03405579.
6
Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.淋巴结清扫范围对前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后生存的影响。
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.055. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
7
Detection of occult lymph node metastases in locally advanced node-negative prostate cancer.局部晚期淋巴结阴性前列腺癌中隐匿性淋巴结转移的检测
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2735-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4767.
8
Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy--does it have an impact on urinary continence?保留神经的开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术——对尿失禁有影响吗?
J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):189-95. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00574-X.
9
Lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary incontinence, sexual function and quality of life after radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy: real life experience in Austria.根治性前列腺切除术和体外放疗后的下尿路症状、尿失禁、性功能及生活质量:奥地利的真实生活经验
World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):325-30. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0075-1. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
10
Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌患者中盆腔淋巴结阳性的发生率、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平≤10 ng/mL且活检Gleason评分≤6的情况及其对根治性前列腺切除术后无PSA进展生存期的影响。
BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06166.x.

前列腺癌管理中根治性前列腺切除术手术和病理质量绩效优化指南:循证基础

Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

作者信息

Chin Joseph L, Srigley John, Mayhew Linda A, Rumble R Bryan, Crossley Claire, Hunter Amber, Fleshner Neil, Bora Bish, McLeod Robin, McNair Sheila, Langer Bernard, Evans Andrew

机构信息

Regional Head of Surgical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON;

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Feb;4(1):13-25. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.08105.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.08105
PMID:20165572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2811992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective is to provide surgical and pathological guidelines for radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to achieve optimal benefit for patients, with minimal risk of harm.

METHODS

For surgical questions, a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database was performed. A literature search for the pathological questions was not conducted since the protocol for invasive carcinomas of the prostate gland developed by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) was endorsed. Urologists and pathologists were consulted for their assessment of the surgical and pathological recommendations.

RESULTS

Limited high-quality evidence from 95 primary studies was available and, therefore, the expert panel developed recommendations on the basis of a consensus of the expert opinion of the working group and through a consultation with urologists and pathologists. In addition to the CAP protocol, some technical recommendations related to the handling and processing of the specimen were made.

CONCLUSION

Radical prostatectomy is recommended for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer, depending on a patient's preoperative risk profile. The panel unanimously determined that the goals for RP are to attain a positive margin rate of <25% for pT2 disease, a mortality rate of <1%, rates of rectal injury of <1% and blood transfusion rates of <10% in non-anemic patients. Standard PLND should be mandatory in high-risk patients, should be recommended for intermediate-risk patients and should be optional for low-risk patients. The quality and effectiveness of this treatment and of subsequent patient care depend on good management, effective communication and reporting between surgeons and pathologists working together as part of a multidisciplinary team. The complete guideline document is posted on the Cancer Care Ontario website (www.cancercare.on.ca); search in their Toolbox, Quality Guidelines & Standards, Clinical Program category under "surgery."

摘要

背景

目的是提供行或不行同期盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的手术和病理指南,以使患者获得最大益处,同时将伤害风险降至最低。

方法

对于手术问题,检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库。由于美国病理学家学会(CAP)制定的前列腺浸润性癌方案已获认可,因此未对病理问题进行文献检索。就手术和病理建议的评估咨询了泌尿科医生和病理学家。

结果

有来自95项主要研究的有限高质量证据,因此,专家小组在工作组专家意见共识的基础上,并通过与泌尿科医生和病理学家协商制定了建议。除了CAP方案外,还提出了一些与标本处理和加工相关的技术建议。

结论

根据患者术前风险状况,建议行根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌。专家小组一致确定,RP的目标是pT2疾病的切缘阳性率<25%,死亡率<1%,直肠损伤率<1%,非贫血患者输血率<10%。标准PLND对高危患者应是强制性的,对中危患者应推荐,对低危患者应是可选择的。这种治疗及后续患者护理的质量和有效性取决于作为多学科团队一部分的外科医生和病理学家之间的良好管理以及有效的沟通和报告。完整的指南文件发布在安大略癌症护理网站(www.cancercare.on.ca)上;在其工具箱、质量指南与标准、临床项目类别下的“手术”中搜索。