Health and Rehabilitation Research Centre, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1173-83. doi: 10.3109/09638281003653302.
Despite a range of factors being proposed in research literature to be key to 'work-ability', agreed definitions and boundaries of this concept are lacking. This review sought to identify and clarify key factors thought to contribute to individual work-ability, then compare these against existing measures of work-ability for people with injury.
A literature search was undertaken based on principles of systematic review. MEDLINE, AMED, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched. All potentially relevant articles were obtained and, if they met inclusion criteria, evaluated for quality. The search was expanded and repeated to identify currently available measures of work-ability for people with injury. These measures were then compared against components from the first search.
Thirty-four articles were obtained from the first search, and 23 provided information about factors that contribute to work-ability. Six broad categories were identified: physical, psychological, cognitive, social/behavioural, workplace factors, and factors outside the workplace. The follow-up search identified 10 measures. No one measure captured all six identified categories.
Components contributing to work-ability go beyond the ability to perform particular work tasks. Measures intended to be used to inform vocational rehabilitation arguably need to consider all these factors to maximise likelihood of a sustainable return to work.
尽管研究文献中提出了一系列被认为是“工作能力”关键的因素,但该概念的定义和界限仍缺乏共识。本综述旨在确定和澄清被认为有助于个体工作能力的关键因素,然后将这些因素与现有的针对受伤人群的工作能力衡量标准进行比较。
根据系统综述的原则进行文献检索。检索了 MEDLINE、AMED、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库。获取了所有潜在相关的文章,如果符合纳入标准,则对其进行质量评估。扩展并重复搜索,以确定目前针对受伤人群的工作能力衡量标准。然后将这些衡量标准与第一次搜索的组成部分进行比较。
从第一次搜索中获得了 34 篇文章,其中 23 篇提供了关于有助于工作能力的因素的信息。确定了六个广泛的类别:身体、心理、认知、社会/行为、工作场所因素和工作场所之外的因素。后续搜索确定了 10 种衡量标准。没有一种衡量标准涵盖了所有六个确定的类别。
有助于工作能力的因素不仅仅是执行特定工作任务的能力。旨在用于告知职业康复的衡量标准可能需要考虑所有这些因素,以最大限度地提高可持续重返工作岗位的可能性。