• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盆腔 MRI 在术前诊断子宫内膜异位症中的位置依赖性价值。

Location-dependent value of pelvic MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Vivantes - Network for Health, Humboldt-Hospital, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.02.007
PMID:23478073
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative diagnosis of specific anatomical locations of endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Between July 2008 and April 2011, 152 women (mean age 33.5 ± 6.1 years) with clinical and sonographic suspicion of endometriosis underwent pelvic MRI using T2 and unenhanced T1 sequences with and without fat saturation. Two radiologists interpreted the following regions by consensus according to a standardized protocol: ovaries, vagina, pouch of Douglas, rectosigmoid colon, uterosacral ligament (USL), bladder, peritoneum, and other pelvic regions. The results of MRI were retrospectively correlated with the laparoscopic and histopathologic findings. The main outcome parameters, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), were determined.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, positive and the negative likelihood ratio were 87.6%, 84.6%, 94.3%, 70.2%, 86.8%, 5.69 and 0.15 for the pouch of Douglas (vagina: 81.4%, 81.7%, 79.2%, 83.8%, 81.6%, 4.45, 0.23; rectosigmoid colon: 80.2%, 77.5%, 80.2%, 77.5%, 78.9%, 3.56, 0.25; USL: 77.5%, 68.2%, 77.5%, 68.2%, 73.7%, 2.44, 0.33; ovaries: 86.3%, 73.6%, 78.4%, 82.8%, 80.3%, 3.27, 0.19; urinary bladder: 81.0%, 94.7%, 70.8%, 96.9%, 92.8%, 15.15, 0.20; peritoneum: 35.3%, 88.1%, 60.0%, 73.0%, 70.4%, 2.97, 0.73). All endometriotic implants at other localization were detected (abdominal wall in 4, groin in one patient).

CONCLUSIONS

The value of MRI in preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis is dependent on the location of endometriosis. The highest accuracy was found in bladder endometriosis and the lowest in peritoneal endometriosis.

摘要

目的

探讨磁共振成像(MRI)在子宫内膜异位症特定解剖部位术前诊断中的价值。

研究设计

2008 年 7 月至 2011 年 4 月,152 例临床和超声怀疑子宫内膜异位症的女性患者接受盆腔 MRI 检查,使用 T2 和增强 T1 序列,包括和不包括脂肪饱和。两名放射科医生根据标准化协议对以下区域进行共识解读:卵巢、阴道、Douglas 窝、直肠乙状结肠、子宫骶韧带(USL)、膀胱、腹膜和其他盆腔区域。MRI 结果与腹腔镜和组织病理学结果进行回顾性比较。主要观察参数为灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、准确性、阳性似然比(LR+)和阴性似然比(LR-)。

结果

Douglas 窝(阴道:81.4%、81.7%、79.2%、83.8%、81.6%、4.45、0.23;直肠乙状结肠:80.2%、77.5%、80.2%、77.5%、78.9%、3.56、0.25;USL:77.5%、68.2%、77.5%、68.2%、73.7%、2.44、0.33;卵巢:86.3%、73.6%、78.4%、82.8%、80.3%、3.27、0.19;膀胱:81.0%、94.7%、70.8%、96.9%、92.8%、15.15、0.20;腹膜:35.3%、88.1%、60.0%、73.0%、70.4%、2.97、0.73)的敏感度、特异度、PPV、NPV、准确性、阳性和阴性似然比分别为 87.6%、84.6%、94.3%、70.2%、86.8%、5.69 和 0.15。其他定位的所有子宫内膜异位症病灶均被检测到(腹壁 4 例,腹股沟 1 例)。

结论

MRI 在子宫内膜异位症术前诊断中的价值取决于病变的位置。膀胱子宫内膜异位症的准确性最高,腹膜子宫内膜异位症的准确性最低。

相似文献

1
Location-dependent value of pelvic MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis.盆腔 MRI 在术前诊断子宫内膜异位症中的位置依赖性价值。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
2
Beyond laparoscopy: 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration.超越腹腔镜检查:3T 磁共振成像在后阴道封闭评估中的应用。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Dec;30(10):1432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
3
Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症:用于疾病诊断及预测病变范围的磁共振成像
Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):379-89. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030762. Epub 2004 Jun 17.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and MRI in the Mapping of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) Consensus.超声和 MRI 对深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症定位的诊断准确性:应用国际深部子宫内膜异位症分析(IDEA)共识。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 30;2020:3583989. doi: 10.1155/2020/3583989. eCollection 2020.
5
Bladder endometriosis: characterization by magnetic resonance imaging and the value of documenting ureteral involvement.膀胱子宫内膜异位症:磁共振成像特征及记录输尿管受累情况的价值
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 May;176:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.019. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
6
[Preoperative imaging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis in: Transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging].[深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症的术前影像学检查:经阴道超声、直肠腔内超声及磁共振成像]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Nov;40(11):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
7
Agreement and reproducibility in identification of endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging.使用磁共振成像识别子宫内膜异位症的一致性和可重复性。
Acta Radiol. 2010 Jun;51(5):573-80. doi: 10.3109/02841851003657343.
8
Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: preliminary results.三维和二维 FSE T2 加权 MRI 在深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症诊断中的比较:初步结果。
Clin Radiol. 2013 Jan;68(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
9
Deep pelvic endometriosis: limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with conventional MR images.深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症:与常规 MR 图像相比,增强后附加诊断价值有限。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):e331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
10
Learning curve in the detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis by using Magnetic Resonance: comparison with surgical results.利用磁共振检测卵巢和深部子宫内膜异位症的学习曲线:与手术结果的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Endometriosis: A Potential Link to Inflammation and Disease Progression.子宫内膜异位症中的肠道微生物群失调:与炎症和疾病进展的潜在联系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 27;26(11):5144. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115144.
2
Chronic demyelination interferes with normal spermatogenesis in cuprizone-intoxicant C57/BL 6 mice: An experimental study.慢性脱髓鞘干扰了用铜螯合剂中毒的C57/BL 6小鼠的正常精子发生:一项实验研究。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024 Feb 23;22(1):43-54. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v22i1.15241. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Is the Optimal Imaging Modality for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis?
经阴道超声与磁共振成像:诊断子宫内膜异位症的最佳成像方式是什么?
Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 23;11(10):2609. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102609.
4
MRI of endometriosis in correlation with the #Enzian classification: applicability and structured report.子宫内膜异位症的MRI与#恩齐安分类的相关性:适用性和结构化报告
Insights Imaging. 2023 Jul 5;14(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01466-x.
5
Diagnosis of Endometriosis by Transvaginal Ultrasound: An Online Survey of Gynecologists Practising in Greece.经阴道超声诊断子宫内膜异位症:对希腊执业妇科医生的在线调查
Cureus. 2023 Apr 21;15(4):e37950. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37950. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
A review of more than 2000 cases of site-specific pelvic endometriosis rates by MRI: a guide to minimizing under/overdiagnosis non-invasively.通过MRI对2000多例特定部位盆腔子宫内膜异位症发生率的回顾:一种非侵入性减少漏诊/误诊的指南。
Insights Imaging. 2022 Aug 8;13(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01270-z.
7
Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis.经阴道超声与磁共振成像(MRI)在子宫内膜异位症诊断中的价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;12(7):1767. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071767.
8
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and MRI in the Mapping of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) Consensus.超声和 MRI 对深部盆腔子宫内膜异位症定位的诊断准确性:应用国际深部子宫内膜异位症分析(IDEA)共识。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 30;2020:3583989. doi: 10.1155/2020/3583989. eCollection 2020.
9
European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会(ESUR)指南:盆腔子宫内膜异位症的磁共振成像
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2765-2775. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
10
Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.子宫内膜异位症非侵入性诊断的成像方式
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD009591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2.