JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA 52317, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 May;54(5):2182-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01662-09. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
The in vitro activity of CEM-101, a new fluoroketolide, was determined against Gram-positive organisms with various macrolide susceptibility profiles. Experiments for determination of the MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), timed killing, single-step and multistep mutation rates, the erythromycin induction of resistance, postantibiotic effect (PAE), and drug interactions were performed for CEM-101; and the results were compared to those obtained with telithromycin, macrolides, and lincosamides. The MBCs of CEM-101 remained lower overall than those of telithromycin, and CEM-101 displayed a 2-fold greater potency than the ketolide. Timed-killing curve testing showed that CEM-101 had greater bactericidal activity than telithromycin (a >or=3-log(10)-CFU/ml decrease in the initial inoculum at 24 h) against the staphylococcal isolates tested. The propensity of CEM-101 to cause resistance was low, as determined from the rates of resistance determined in single-step mutational studies (<10(-8) or 10(-9)). In multipassaging studies, mutants of two strains (both of which were USA300 isolates) resistant to CEM-101 emerged. That number was comparable to the number resistant to clindamycin but less than the number resistant to telithromycin. Erythromycin induced CEM-101 resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, similar to telithromycin; however, in seven of eight beta-hemolytic streptococci, CEM-101 resistance induction was not observed. CEM-101 showed a significant concentration- and exposure-dependent PAE against the strains tested, with the values ranging from 2.3 to 6.1 h for Gram-positive organisms (these times were longer than those for telithromycin). No antagonism was found in synergy analyses, with enhanced inhibition being most noted for combinations with CEM-101 and ceftriaxone, gentamicin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Overall, this new antimicrobial agent (CEM-101) showed good antimicrobial characteristics compared with those of the agents in its class and exhibited measured parameter values similar or superior to those of utilized comparators, indicating that CEM-101 warrants further clinical evaluation.
CEM-101 是一种新型氟酮内酯,对具有不同大环内酯类药物敏感性谱的革兰氏阳性菌的体外活性进行了测定。为了确定 CEM-101 的 MIC 和最低杀菌浓度 (MBC)、定时杀灭、单步和多步突变率、红霉素诱导耐药性、抗生素后效应 (PAE) 和药物相互作用,进行了 CEM-101 的实验;并将结果与泰利霉素、大环内酯类和林可酰胺类药物的结果进行了比较。总的来说,CEM-101 的 MBC 始终低于泰利霉素,并且 CEM-101 的效力比酮内酯高 2 倍。时间杀伤曲线试验表明,CEM-101 对测试的葡萄球菌分离株具有比泰利霉素更强的杀菌活性(在 24 小时内初始接种物减少>or=3-log(10)-CFU/ml)。从单步突变研究中确定的耐药率(<10(-8)或 10(-9))来看,CEM-101 引起耐药的倾向较低。在多传代研究中,两种菌株(均为 USA300 分离株)对 CEM-101 耐药的突变体出现。这一数字与克林霉素耐药的数量相当,但少于泰利霉素耐药的数量。红霉素诱导金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎链球菌对 CEM-101 的耐药性,与泰利霉素相似;然而,在 8 株β-溶血性链球菌中,未观察到 CEM-101 耐药诱导。CEM-101 对测试菌株表现出显著的浓度和暴露依赖性 PAE,其值范围为 2.3 至 6.1 小时,针对革兰氏阳性菌(这些时间比泰利霉素长)。在协同分析中未发现拮抗作用,最明显的是 CEM-101 与头孢曲松、庆大霉素和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑联合使用的抑制增强。总的来说,与同类药物相比,这种新型抗菌药物(CEM-101)表现出良好的抗菌特性,并表现出与使用的对照药物相似或更高的测量参数值,表明 CEM-101 值得进一步临床评价。