• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和丹麦烟民的风险感知和道德观念:一种定性方法。

Risk perception and moralization among smokers in the USA and Denmark: a qualitative approach.

机构信息

Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):871-86. doi: 10.1348/135910710X490415. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1348/135910710X490415
PMID:20181322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3465077/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present research explored the role that culture plays in smokers' description of their risk perceptions and experiences as targets of moralization.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 15 smokers each from Denmark (a smoking-lenient culture) and the USA (a smoking-prohibitive culture).

RESULTS

Smokers said they were well aware of the risks of smoking yet minimized the risks of active and passive smoking; Danes were particularly likely to minimize these risks. Smokers also described many experiences as targets of moralization and accepted some elements of moralized attitudes although overall Danes more strongly rejected moralized opinions. Smokers described adjusting to moralization by changing when and where but not how much they smoked.

CONCLUSION

It is important to consider cultural influences on moralization and risk perception of smoking.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了文化在吸烟者描述其对风险的认知和作为道德化目标的经验中所扮演的角色。

方法

我们对来自丹麦(一个对吸烟宽容的文化)和美国(一个禁止吸烟的文化)的 15 名吸烟者进行了深入的定性访谈。

结果

吸烟者表示,他们非常清楚吸烟的风险,但却最小化了主动和被动吸烟的风险;丹麦人尤其有可能最小化这些风险。吸烟者还描述了许多被道德化的经历,并接受了一些被道德化的态度,尽管总体来说,丹麦人更强烈地拒绝道德化的观点。吸烟者通过改变吸烟的时间和地点来适应道德化,但不会改变吸烟量。

结论

考虑文化对吸烟的道德化和风险认知的影响很重要。

相似文献

1
Risk perception and moralization among smokers in the USA and Denmark: a qualitative approach.美国和丹麦烟民的风险感知和道德观念:一种定性方法。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):871-86. doi: 10.1348/135910710X490415. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
2
Does moralization motivate smokers to quit? A longitudinal study of representative samples of smokers in the United States and Denmark.道德化会促使吸烟者戒烟吗?一项对美国和丹麦吸烟者代表性样本的纵向研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Oct;16(10):1379-86. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu091. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
3
Smoking cross-culturally: risk perceptions among young adults in Denmark and the United States.跨文化吸烟:丹麦和美国青年的风险认知。
Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):81-93. doi: 10.1080/08870440801932656.
4
A Person-Centered Approach to Moralization-The Case of Vaping.以人本主义为中心的道德化方法——以蒸气烟为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 5;19(9):5628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095628.
5
Attitudes and perceptions toward smoking: smokers' views of themselves and other smokers.对吸烟的态度和认知:吸烟者对自己及其他吸烟者的看法。
J Soc Psychol. 1994 Jun;134(3):355-61. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711740.
6
Acculturation matters: risk perceptions of smoking among Bosnian refugees living in the United States.文化适应很重要:居住在美国的波斯尼亚难民对吸烟的风险认知
J Immigr Minor Health. 2008 Oct;10(5):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-007-9107-1.
7
"I have never experienced any problem with my health. So far, it hasn't been harmful": older Greek-Australian smokers' views on smoking: a qualitative study.“我身体一直很好。到目前为止,吸烟还没有造成任何危害”:希腊裔澳大利亚老年烟民对吸烟的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 29;15:304. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1677-6.
8
A randomized experiment to examine unintended consequences of dietary supplement use among daily smokers: taking supplements reduces self-regulation of smoking.一项随机实验研究了日常吸烟者使用膳食补充剂的意外后果:服用补充剂会降低对吸烟的自我调节。
Addiction. 2011 Dec;106(12):2221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03545.x. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
9
Smokers' accounts on the health risks of smoking: why is smoking not dangerous for me?烟民对吸烟健康风险的看法:为什么吸烟对我没有危险?
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Sep;71(5):877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.036. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
10
The Most Natural Tobacco Used: A Qualitative Investigation of Young Adult Smokers' Risk Perceptions of Flavored Little Cigars and Cigarillos.使用的最天然烟草:对年轻成年吸烟者对调味小雪茄和小雪茄烟风险认知的定性调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):827-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv151. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Ostracism Help Smokers Quit?排斥有助于吸烟者戒烟吗?
Stigma Health. 2024 Feb;9(1):30-38. doi: 10.1037/sah0000304. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Using Moralization as a Persuasion Strategy in Public Health Messages: A Cross-Sectional, Experimental Study on Vaping.将道德化作为公共卫生信息中的说理策略:关于电子烟的一项横断面、实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214859.
3
Reminders of a Stigmatized Status Might Help Smokers Quit.对受污名化状态的提醒可能有助于吸烟者戒烟。
Stigma Health. 2020 Aug;5(3):273-283. doi: 10.1037/sah0000197. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Perceived social benefits versus perceived harms of smoking among Indonesian boys aged 12-16 years: A secondary analysis of Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2014.12至16岁印度尼西亚男孩对吸烟社会益处与危害的认知:2014年全球青少年烟草调查的二次分析
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Feb 3;6:8. doi: 10.18332/tpc/115034. eCollection 2020.
5
DOES IT HELP SMOKERS IF WE STIGMATIZE THEM? A TEST OF THE STIGMA-INDUCED IDENTITY THREAT MODEL AMONG U.S. AND DANISH SMOKERS.如果我们让吸烟者蒙羞,这对他们有帮助吗?一项针对美国和丹麦吸烟者的耻辱感引发的身份威胁模型测试。
Soc Cogn. 2019 Jun;37(3):294-313. doi: 10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.294. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
6
Boy Smokers' Rationalisations for Engaging in Potentially Fatal Behaviour: In-Depth Interviews in The Netherlands.荷兰深度访谈:男青少年烟民对参与致命行为的合理化解释
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 16;15(4):767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040767.
7
Qualitative study of Singaporean youths' perception of antismoking campaigns: what works and what does not.新加坡青少年对反吸烟运动认知的定性研究:哪些有效,哪些无效。
Tob Control. 2016 Dec;25(e2):e101-e106. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052692. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
Perspectives on Smoking Initiation and Maintenance: A Qualitative Exploration among Singapore Youth.青少年吸烟起始与维持的观点:新加坡青少年的质性探索
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jul 31;12(8):8956-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120808956.
9
Does moralization motivate smokers to quit? A longitudinal study of representative samples of smokers in the United States and Denmark.道德化会促使吸烟者戒烟吗?一项对美国和丹麦吸烟者代表性样本的纵向研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Oct;16(10):1379-86. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu091. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do young adult smokers continue to smoke despite the health risks? A focus group study.为什么青少年烟民明知吸烟有害健康还要继续吸烟?一项聚焦小组研究。
Psychol Health. 2009 Feb;24(2):203-20. doi: 10.1080/08870440701670570.
2
Smoking cross-culturally: risk perceptions among young adults in Denmark and the United States.跨文化吸烟:丹麦和美国青年的风险认知。
Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):81-93. doi: 10.1080/08870440801932656.
3
Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation - United States, 2008.2008年美国成年人吸烟情况及戒烟趋势
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Nov 13;58(44):1227-32.
4
Disgust as embodied moral judgment.厌恶作为具身化的道德判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1096-109. doi: 10.1177/0146167208317771. Epub 2008 May 27.
5
Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry.吸烟及烟草行业去规范化的标志。
Tob Control. 2008 Feb;17(1):25-31. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021386.
6
Acculturation matters: risk perceptions of smoking among Bosnian refugees living in the United States.文化适应很重要:居住在美国的波斯尼亚难民对吸烟的风险认知
J Immigr Minor Health. 2008 Oct;10(5):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-007-9107-1.
7
Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries.四个国家吸烟者对烟草去常态化的看法及行业观念
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
8
'I think that it's a pain in the ass that I have to stand outside in the cold and have a cigarette': representations of smoking and experiences of disapproval in UK and Greek smokers.“我觉得非得在寒冷中站在外面抽烟真是烦透了”:英国和希腊吸烟者对吸烟的看法及遭遇反对的经历
J Health Psychol. 2006 May;11(3):441-51. doi: 10.1177/1359105306063317.
9
The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity.烟草控制量表:一种衡量国家行动的新量表。
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15(3):247-53. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015347.
10
Tobacco control, stigma, and public health: rethinking the relations.烟草控制、污名化与公共卫生:重新思考三者关系
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jan;96(1):47-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071886. Epub 2005 Nov 29.