• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨文化吸烟:丹麦和美国青年的风险认知。

Smoking cross-culturally: risk perceptions among young adults in Denmark and the United States.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA 17013, United States.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):81-93. doi: 10.1080/08870440801932656.

DOI:10.1080/08870440801932656
PMID:20186641
Abstract

Research examining smokers' understanding of their smoking risk reveals that smokers acknowledge some risk but often deny or minimize personal risk. We examined risk perceptions of lung cancer among smokers and non-smokers in a smoking-lenient (Denmark) and a smoking-prohibitive (the United States) culture. Participants were 275 Danish students attending trade schools (mean age 22.6 years) and 297 US students attending community colleges in Florida (mean age 23.6 years). Results revealed cross-cultural differences suggesting that Danish smokers showed greater risk minimization than US smokers. In addition, in both countries the risk of a typical smoker was rated as lower by smokers than non-smokers, and smokers rated their personal risk as lower than they rated the risk of the typical smoker. Cross-cultural differences in moralization of smoking might be one explanation for these findings.

摘要

研究表明,吸烟者对自身吸烟风险的理解存在偏差,他们往往承认存在一定风险,但却否认或低估个人风险。本研究在吸烟宽松(丹麦)和禁止吸烟(美国)的文化背景下,对吸烟者和非吸烟者的肺癌风险认知进行了研究。参与者为 275 名丹麦贸易学校的学生(平均年龄 22.6 岁)和 297 名美国佛罗里达州社区大学的学生(平均年龄 23.6 岁)。研究结果显示,存在跨文化差异,表明丹麦吸烟者比美国吸烟者表现出更大的风险最小化倾向。此外,在这两个国家,吸烟者对典型吸烟者的风险评估都低于非吸烟者,而且吸烟者对个人风险的评估也低于对典型吸烟者风险的评估。对吸烟进行道德评判的跨文化差异可能是这些发现的一个解释。

相似文献

1
Smoking cross-culturally: risk perceptions among young adults in Denmark and the United States.跨文化吸烟:丹麦和美国青年的风险认知。
Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):81-93. doi: 10.1080/08870440801932656.
2
Women smokers' perceptions of smoking-related health risks.女性吸烟者对吸烟相关健康风险的认知。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 May;12(4):363-71. doi: 10.1089/154099903765448871.
3
Risk perception of oral cancer in smokers attending primary care: a randomised controlled trial.初级保健机构中吸烟者对口腔癌的风险认知:一项随机对照试验。
Oral Oncol. 2004 Oct;40(9):916-24. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.04.008.
4
Risk perception and moralization among smokers in the USA and Denmark: a qualitative approach.美国和丹麦烟民的风险感知和道德观念:一种定性方法。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):871-86. doi: 10.1348/135910710X490415. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
5
Tobacco use amongst high school students in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国高中生的烟草使用情况。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2004 Mar;12(1):32-5.
6
Knowledge and perceived risk of smoking-related conditions: a survey of cigarette smokers.吸烟相关疾病的知识与感知风险:一项针对吸烟者的调查
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.024.
7
Genre-specific media and perceptions of personal and social risk of smoking among South Korean college students.特定类型媒体与韩国大学生对吸烟个人和社会风险的认知
J Health Commun. 2011 May;16(5):533-49. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546488.
8
Relation between newspaper coverage of 'light' cigarette litigation and beliefs about 'lights' among American adolescents and young adults: the impact on risk perceptions and quitting intentions.报纸对“淡味”香烟诉讼的报道与美国青少年和年轻人对“淡味”香烟的看法之间的关系:对风险认知和戒烟意愿的影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Aug;19(4):267-73. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032029. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
9
Smoking among schoolchildren in metropolitan Manila.马尼拉大都会地区学童的吸烟情况。
Philipp J Cardiol. 1984 Jan-Mar;12(1):11-8.
10
Smoking behavior among hospital staff still influences attitudes and counseling on smoking.医院工作人员的吸烟行为仍然会影响对吸烟的态度和相关咨询。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6(2):369-75. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001676422.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended parallel process model (EPPM) in evaluating lung Cancer risk perception among older smokers.扩展平行过程模型(EPPM)评估老年吸烟者的肺癌风险感知。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 17;21(1):1872. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11896-1.
2
Reminders of a Stigmatized Status Might Help Smokers Quit.对受污名化状态的提醒可能有助于吸烟者戒烟。
Stigma Health. 2020 Aug;5(3):273-283. doi: 10.1037/sah0000197. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
DOES IT HELP SMOKERS IF WE STIGMATIZE THEM? A TEST OF THE STIGMA-INDUCED IDENTITY THREAT MODEL AMONG U.S. AND DANISH SMOKERS.
如果我们让吸烟者蒙羞,这对他们有帮助吗?一项针对美国和丹麦吸烟者的耻辱感引发的身份威胁模型测试。
Soc Cogn. 2019 Jun;37(3):294-313. doi: 10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.294. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
4
Boy Smokers' Rationalisations for Engaging in Potentially Fatal Behaviour: In-Depth Interviews in The Netherlands.荷兰深度访谈:男青少年烟民对参与致命行为的合理化解释
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 16;15(4):767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040767.
5
How are lung cancer risk perceptions and cigarette smoking related?-testing an accuracy hypothesis.肺癌风险认知与吸烟之间有怎样的关联?——检验一个准确性假设。
Transl Cancer Res. 2016 Oct;5(Suppl 5):S964-S971. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2016.10.75.
6
Associations Between Household Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Health Problems Among Non-Smoking Adolescents in the Republic of Korea.韩国非吸烟青少年家庭二手烟暴露与健康问题之间的关联
J Prim Prev. 2017 Aug;38(4):385-402. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0467-6.
7
Perceived benefits and health risks of cigarette smoking among young adults: insights from a cross-sectional study.年轻人对吸烟的感知益处和健康风险:一项横断面研究的见解
Tob Induc Dis. 2015 Jul 31;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12971-015-0044-9. eCollection 2015.
8
Taking Stock of Unrealistic Optimism.审视不切实际的乐观主义。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):395-411. doi: 10.1177/1745691613485247.
9
Does moralization motivate smokers to quit? A longitudinal study of representative samples of smokers in the United States and Denmark.道德化会促使吸烟者戒烟吗?一项对美国和丹麦吸烟者代表性样本的纵向研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Oct;16(10):1379-86. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu091. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
Risk perception and moralization among smokers in the USA and Denmark: a qualitative approach.美国和丹麦烟民的风险感知和道德观念:一种定性方法。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):871-86. doi: 10.1348/135910710X490415. Epub 2010 Feb 23.