• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊服务的最佳免赔额。

Optimal deductibles for outpatient services.

机构信息

Beuth Hochschule für Technik Berlin, University of Applied Sciences, Luxemburger Strasse 10, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0222-x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-010-0222-x
PMID:20182764
Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of absolute deductibles on the cost of insurance for outpatient services. Moreover, cost savings on retained losses are estimated. Sharing risks between the insured and the insurer reduces total expenditure for outpatient benefits by up to 35%. In particular, optimal deductibles are determined in their utilitarian sense: the maximum possible savings on medical expenses are computed from the ground up. As part of the study, the effect of age and gender on these savings is analysed. The analysis is based on data taken from the private medical insurance industry in Germany. Similarities and discrepancies with respect to results obtained in the RAND Health Insurance Experiment conducted in the United States from 1971 to 1982 are highlighted.

摘要

本文分析了绝对免赔额对门诊服务保险成本的影响。此外,还估算了自留损失的节省额。被保险人和保险公司分担风险,使门诊福利的总支出最多减少 35%。特别是,从功利主义的角度确定了最优免赔额:从根本上计算了医疗费用的最大可能节省额。作为研究的一部分,分析了年龄和性别对这些节省额的影响。该分析基于取自德国私营医疗保险行业的数据。突出了与 1971 年至 1982 年在美国进行的兰德健康保险实验所得到的结果的相似性和差异。

相似文献

1
Optimal deductibles for outpatient services.门诊服务的最佳免赔额。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0222-x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
2
The demand for episodes of treatment in the Health Insurance Experiment.健康保险实验中治疗阶段的需求。
J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):337-67. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3.
3
The effect of increasing the coinsurance rate on outpatient utilization of healthcare services in South Korea.提高韩国医疗保险自付率对门诊医疗服务利用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2076-8.
4
Effect of cost-sharing on the use of medical services by children: interim results from a randomized controlled trial.费用分担对儿童医疗服务使用的影响:一项随机对照试验的中期结果
Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):942-51.
5
Patient Cost-Sharing and Hospitalization Offsets in the Elderly.老年人的患者自付费用和住院抵消。
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar 1;100(1):193-213. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.193.
6
The impact of change from copayment to coinsurance on medical care usage and expenditure in outpatient setting in older Koreans.自付费用改为共付保险对韩国老年人门诊医疗服务使用和支出的影响。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Jan;33(1):235-245. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2416. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
Cost-sharing and the use of general medical physicians for outpatient mental health care.费用分摊与在门诊心理健康护理中使用普通内科医生的情况。
Health Serv Res. 1987 Apr;22(1):1-17.
8
Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?风险均等化是否会降低自愿免赔额的可行性?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2007 Mar;7(1):43-58. doi: 10.1007/s10754-007-9011-1. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
9
Impact of type of insurance plan on access and utilization of health care services for adults aged 18-64 years with private health insurance: United States, 2007-2008.2007 - 2008年美国私人医疗保险对18 - 64岁成年人获得和使用医疗保健服务的影响:保险计划类型的作用
NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Feb(28):1-8.
10
But managed-care savings will grow--study.但研究表明,管理式医疗的节省费用将会增加。
Mod Healthc. 1997 Jun 9;27(23):8.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumer price sensitivity in Dutch health insurance.荷兰医疗保险中的消费者价格敏感度。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008 Dec;8(4):225-44. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9038-y. Epub 2008 Aug 17.
2
Deductibles and health care expenditures: empirical estimates of price sensitivity based on administrative data.免赔额与医疗保健支出:基于行政数据的价格敏感性实证估计
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Dec;4(4):283-305. doi: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000043759.93644.e0.
3
Consumer price sensitivity and social health insurer choice in Germany and The Netherlands.
德国和荷兰的消费者价格敏感度与社会医疗保险选择
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Jun;3(2):117-38. doi: 10.1023/a:1023369231291.
4
Managed competition and consumer price sensitivity in social health insurance.社会医疗保险中的管理式竞争与消费者价格敏感性
J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1009-29. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00055-3.
5
Switching costs, price sensitivity and health plan choice.转换成本、价格敏感度与健康保险计划选择。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):89-116. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00124-2.
6
The effect of variable health insurance deductibles on the demand for physician visits.可变医疗保险免赔额对门诊需求的影响。
Health Econ. 2001 Jul;10(5):441-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.630.
7
The health plan choices of retirees under managed competition.管理式竞争下退休人员的健康保险计划选择
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):949-76.
8
Deductibles in health insurance: can the actuarially fair premium reduction exceed the deductible?医疗保险中的免赔额:精算公平保费减免能否超过免赔额?
Health Policy. 2000 Sep;53(2):123-41. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00083-x.
9
Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.健康保险与医疗需求:来自一项随机试验的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 1987 Jun;77(3):251-77.
10
Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial.兰德健康保险实验中的医疗服务使用情况。一项随机对照试验中的诊断及特定服务分析。
Med Care. 1986 Sep;24(9 Suppl):S1-87.