Barnes J, Hassan A, Cuerden R, Cookson R, Kohlhofer J
Vehicle Safety Research Centre, Ergonomics and Safety Research Institute, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:83-9.
The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in car occupant injury severity recorded in AIS 2005 compared to AIS 1990 and to outline the likely effects on future data analysis findings. Occupant injury data in the UK Cooperative Crash Injury Study Database (CCIS) were coded for the period February 2006 to November 2007 using both AIS 1990 and AIS 2005. Data for 1,994 occupants with over 6000 coded injuries were reviewed at the AIS and MAIS level of severities and body regions to determine changes between the two coding methodologies. Overall there was an apparent general trend for fewer injuries to be coded at the AIS 4+ severity and more injuries to be coded at the AIS 2 severity. When these injury trends were reviewed in more detail it was found that the body regions which contributed the most to these changes in severity were the head, thorax and extremities. This is one of the first studies to examine the implications for large databases when changing to an updated method for coding injuries.
本研究的目的是调查2005年简略损伤分级(AIS)与1990年AIS相比,汽车驾乘人员损伤严重程度记录的差异,并概述对未来数据分析结果可能产生的影响。英国合作碰撞损伤研究数据库(CCIS)中的驾乘人员损伤数据在2006年2月至2007年11月期间,使用1990年AIS和2005年AIS进行了编码。在AIS和最高AIS分级(MAIS)的严重程度及身体部位层面,对1994名驾乘人员的6000多处编码损伤数据进行了审查,以确定两种编码方法之间的变化。总体而言,明显存在一种普遍趋势,即按AIS 4级及以上严重程度编码的损伤较少,而按AIS 2级严重程度编码的损伤较多。当更详细地审查这些损伤趋势时,发现对严重程度变化贡献最大的身体部位是头部、胸部和四肢。这是首批研究之一,探讨了在转换为更新的损伤编码方法时对大型数据库的影响。