University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jun;4(2):149-58. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0116-z. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
Due to early detection and treatment, survival from colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis has been steadily increasing. A CRC diagnosis could be considered a "teachable moment," a time when interventionists might successfully promote dietary changes. CRC interventions with tailored print communication (TPC) and telephone motivational interviewing (TMI) have been shown to be effective in promoting fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) among CRC survivors. However, little is known about how these interventions work to exert their effect. This study investigated whether information processes mediate the relationship between a CRC intervention and FVC among CRC survivors.
This research used data from NC STRIDES, a study that tested the efficacy of two CRC intervention strategies to promote FVC among CRC survivors. Participants were randomized to control, TPC, TMI, or combined (TPC+TMI). Structural equation models were constructed to analyze data from 266 CRC survivors using two different measures of FVC, a 35-item and a 2-item measure.
Two information processes, relevance of communication and trust in the communication, mediated the effect of TPC+TMI on FVC for both 35-item and 2-item measures. TPC+TMI was significantly associated with relevance of communication, and perceiving greater relevance was significantly related to trust in the communication. Trust was significantly related to FVC.
Information processes, including relevance and trust in the communication, serve as mediators of the relationship between the CRC intervention and FVC.
Future intervention research should investigate ways to enhance relevance of communication and trust in interventions with CRC survivors.
由于早期检测和治疗,结直肠癌(CRC)诊断后的生存率一直在稳步提高。CRC 诊断可以被视为一个“可教育的时刻”,此时干预者可能会成功地促进饮食改变。针对 CRC 幸存者的定制印刷通讯(TPC)和电话动机访谈(TMI)干预措施已被证明可以有效地促进水果和蔬菜的消费(FVC)。然而,对于这些干预措施如何发挥作用,我们知之甚少。本研究调查了信息处理是否在 CRC 干预措施与 CRC 幸存者的 FVC 之间起中介作用。
本研究使用了 NC STRIDES 的数据,该研究测试了两种 CRC 干预策略对促进 CRC 幸存者 FVC 的功效。参与者被随机分配到对照组、TPC 组、TMI 组或联合组(TPC+TMI 组)。使用两种不同的 FVC 测量方法(35 项和 2 项测量),构建结构方程模型来分析来自 266 名 CRC 幸存者的数据。
两种信息处理过程,即沟通的相关性和对沟通的信任,中介了 TPC+TMI 对两种 FVC 测量方法(35 项和 2 项)的影响。TPC+TMI 与沟通的相关性显著相关,感知到更大的相关性与对沟通的信任显著相关。信任与 FVC 显著相关。
信息处理过程,包括沟通的相关性和对沟通的信任,是 CRC 干预措施与 FVC 之间关系的中介。
未来的干预研究应该研究如何提高与 CRC 幸存者的沟通相关性和信任。