• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统手术与腔镜辅助手术治疗甲状腺疾病的对比:术后疼痛的客观评估。

Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2415-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0964-7. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-0964-7
PMID:20195641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective, randomized study was designed to objectively demonstrate that minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) improves postoperative pain compared with standard thyroidectomy, via the dosage of biochemical mediators measured before and after surgery.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients undergoing total thyroidectomy were allotted to MIVAT (n = 23) or traditional thyroidectomy (OPEN) (n = 26) groups. At hospitalization (T0), interleukin (IL)-1, -2, -4, -6, -10, -3, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, TGF-β, and MCP-1 were measured. The basal pain tolerance also was evaluated by VAS. Blood samples for interleukin measurement and VAS evaluations were obtained from all patients in the recovery room (T1) and 24 h after surgery (T2).

RESULTS

At T0, the MIVAT and the OPEN groups were not different in terms of basal pain tolerance and biochemical profile. At T1, VAS scores were significantly higher (p = 0.04), whereas TGF-β (p = 0.03) and MCP-1 (p = 0.03) levels were significantly lower in the OPEN than in the MIVAT group. No significant difference was demonstrated for other interleukins. A significant inverse relationship between VAS and TGF-β was demonstrated and confirmed through the correlation (p = 0.003) and regression (p = 0.003, p < 0.0001, R (2) = 0.172) coefficients; the stepwise regression also demonstrated that TGF was the most predictive factor of postoperative pain (p = 0.0038) through an inverse relationship. No statistically significant difference has been demonstrated at T2.

CONCLUSIONS

TGF-β serum levels immediately after surgery seem to correlate with pain evaluation, confirming that reduced postoperative distress is an objective outcome of MIVAT. This result confirms the results of studies based only on subjective pain evaluations.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性随机研究旨在通过手术前后生化介质的测定,客观地证明微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)比传统甲状腺切除术(OPEN)术后疼痛减轻。

方法

49 例行甲状腺全切除术的患者被分为 MIVAT(n=23)或传统甲状腺切除术(OPEN)(n=26)组。在住院时(T0),测定白细胞介素(IL)-1、-2、-4、-6、-10、-3、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、TGF-β和 MCP-1。还通过 VAS 评估基础疼痛耐受度。所有患者在恢复室(T1)和术后 24 小时(T2)时均采集白细胞介素测定和 VAS 评估的血样。

结果

T0 时,MIVAT 和 OPEN 两组在基础疼痛耐受度和生化特征方面无差异。T1 时,OPEN 组的 VAS 评分明显升高(p=0.04),而 TGF-β(p=0.03)和 MCP-1(p=0.03)水平明显低于 MIVAT 组。其他白细胞介素无显著差异。通过相关性(p=0.003)和回归(p=0.003,p<0.0001,R²=0.172)证实,VAS 与 TGF-β 呈显著负相关,并通过相关性得到证实;逐步回归还表明,TGF 是术后疼痛的最具预测性因素(p=0.0038),这是通过负相关关系得出的。T2 时无统计学差异。

结论

术后即刻 TGF-β 血清水平似乎与疼痛评估相关,证实 MIVAT 术后疼痛减轻是客观结果。这一结果证实了仅基于主观疼痛评估的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation.传统手术与腔镜辅助手术治疗甲状腺疾病的对比:术后疼痛的客观评估。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2415-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0964-7. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
2
Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy via the areola approach: a retrospective analysis of safety, postoperative recovery, and patient satisfaction.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与乳晕入路内镜甲状腺切除术的比较:安全性、术后恢复及患者满意度的回顾性分析
Minerva Chir. 2012 Feb;67(1):31-7.
3
Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy (CT).系统评价与荟萃分析前瞻性随机试验比较微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)和传统甲状腺切除术(CT)。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Dec;398(8):1057-68. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1125-y. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
4
Evaluation of postoperative pain after minimally invasive video-assisted and conventional thyroidectomy: results of a prospective study. ESES Vienna presentation.微创视频辅助与传统甲状腺切除术术后疼痛评估:前瞻性研究结果。ESES 维也纳演讲。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Sep;395(7):845-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0688-0. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
5
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy in a general surgery department.普通外科手术中微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2263-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0303-4. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
6
Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?微创电视辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较:是否有循证医学信息?
Thyroid. 2008 Jul;18(7):721-7. doi: 10.1089/thy.2008.0028.
7
Meta-analysis of comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术比较的Meta分析
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Apr;19(8):1381-7.
8
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules.微小滤泡性甲状腺结节的微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术
World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1743-1750. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9147-7.
9
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2445-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9806-2. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
10
Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)与机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术(RATT)后的美容效果及总体满意度:一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1282-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2483-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy vs robot-assisted transaxillary thryoidectomy: analisys and comparison of safety and outcomes.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术:安全性和结果的分析与比较。
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):573-587. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01732-z. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
2
Complications of Trans-oral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach: A Systematic Review.经口内镜甲状腺手术前庭入路的并发症:系统评价。
In Vivo. 2022 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-12. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12671.
3
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT).

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of combined spa-exercise therapy on circulating TGF-beta1 levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.联合水疗-运动疗法对强直性脊柱炎患者循环中转化生长因子-β1水平的影响。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 May;118(9-10):266-72. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0560-y.
2
Upregulation of prostaglandin E2 and interleukins in the central nervous system and peripheral tissue during and after surgery in humans.人类手术期间及术后中枢神经系统和外周组织中前列腺素E2和白细胞介素的上调。
Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):403-10. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00005.
3
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy?
微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)。
Gland Surg. 2020 Jan;9(Suppl 1):S1-S5. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.12.05.
4
Hybrid techniques and patients' safety in implementing transoral sublingual thyroidectomy.经口咽前路甲状腺切除术实施中的杂交技术与患者安全。
Endocrine. 2018 Apr;60(1):50-55. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1539-y. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Morbidity from minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a general review.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术的发病率:综述
Gland Surg. 2017 Oct;6(5):488-491. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.06.05.
6
Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery using a collar access: experience in 246 cases with the CEViTS technique.经颈入路微创内镜甲状腺手术:使用 CEViTS 技术的 246 例经验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1607-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5783-7. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Video-assisted endocrine neck surgery: state of the art.视频辅助颈部内分泌手术:现状
Updates Surg. 2017 Jun;69(2):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0467-3. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
8
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:2400多例手术经验总结
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2489-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4503-4. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 200 cases in a single center.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:单中心200例经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Sep;9(3):337-43. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.43077. Epub 2014 May 29.
10
Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)与机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术(RATT)后的美容效果及总体满意度:一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1282-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2483-5.
微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术治疗滤泡性肿瘤:与传统甲状腺切除术相比有优势吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb;13(2):182-6. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.057. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
4
Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery.电视辅助甲状腺切除术与传统手术的安全性比较。
Head Neck. 2005 Jan;27(1):58-64. doi: 10.1002/hed.20118.
5
Intraperitoneal cytokine response after major surgery: higher postoperative intraperitoneal versus systemic cytokine levels suggest the gastrointestinal tract as the major source of the postoperative inflammatory reaction.大手术后腹腔内细胞因子反应:术后腹腔内细胞因子水平高于全身水平,提示胃肠道是术后炎症反应的主要来源。
Am J Surg. 2004 Mar;187(3):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.019.
6
Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation.理解潜伏性转化生长因子β的激活机制。
J Cell Sci. 2003 Jan 15;116(Pt 2):217-24. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00229.
7
Comparative study of thyroidectomies. Endoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery.甲状腺切除术的比较研究。内镜手术与传统开放手术对比
Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1741-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8830-x. Epub 2002 Jul 29.
8
Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surgery. 2001 Dec;130(6):1039-43. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.118264.
9
Inflammatory response during abdominal and thyroid surgery: a prospective clinical trial on mediator release.腹部手术和甲状腺手术期间的炎症反应:一项关于介质释放的前瞻性临床试验
Shock. 2001 Nov;16(5):334-9. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200116050-00002.