Wellness & Prevention, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson Company, Ft. Washington, PA 19034, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):991-1002. doi: 10.1185/03007991003688193.
This study evaluated the efficacy of a comprehensive stress management program in reducing perceived stress among women who reported moderate-to-high stress levels.
A total of 562 highly motivated females, aged 25-45, with moderate to high stress levels, were enrolled in a 14-week study. Participants were randomized into one of three groups: Group 1 included Internet-based coaching focusing on behavior modification, daily use of proprietary olfactive-based personal care products, and periodic feedback reports; Group 2 consisted of only online coaching; and Group 3 had no active stress management program. Participants in the three groups filled out validated psychometric assessments at baseline and throughout the study period. Several outcomes including Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Profile of Mood States (POMS), St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire (SMS), the Trier Inventory of Chronic Stress (TICS), Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Short-Form-36 (SF-36) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), were measured periodically to assess changes in subject-perceived stress, stress-related comorbidities, and sleep quality and to evaluate overall program efficacy. Ethical approval of protocols was conducted by the Allendale Investigational Review Board (AIRB). Voluntary informed consent was obtained from each subject.
At the end of the 14-week study period, subjects in Group 1 had statistically significant improvement in the PSS score vs. Group 3 (p < 0.01). There were statistically significant improvements in other efficacy outcomes such as POMS total mood disturbance, TICS work overload and social responsibility subscales, STAI and in the number of night awakenings, assessed by the SMS questionnaire (p < 0.05). Self-reported program efficacy was also significantly higher for Group 1 (p < 0.001).
Despite study limitations, including reduction of stress in Group 3, this study demonstrates that this comprehensive stress management program is effective in reducing stress among women with moderate to high stress levels.
本研究评估了综合压力管理方案在降低报告中高压力水平的女性感知压力方面的疗效。
共有 562 名年龄在 25-45 岁之间、压力水平处于中高程度的高积极性女性参与了一项为期 14 周的研究。参与者被随机分为三组:第 1 组包括侧重于行为改变、日常使用专有的嗅觉个人护理产品和定期反馈报告的基于互联网的辅导;第 2 组仅包括在线辅导;第 3 组没有进行积极的压力管理方案。三组参与者在基线和整个研究期间填写了经过验证的心理计量评估。包括压力感知量表(PSS)、心境状态问卷(POMS)、圣玛丽医院睡眠问卷(SMS)、特里尔慢性压力量表(TICS)、斯皮尔伯格状态特质焦虑量表(STAI)、简短形式 36 项健康调查(SF-36)和工作效率和活动障碍(WPAI)在内的几种结果被定期测量,以评估受试者感知压力、与压力相关的合并症以及睡眠质量的变化,并评估整体方案的疗效。协议的伦理批准由艾伦代尔调查审查委员会(AIRB)进行。每位受试者都获得了自愿知情同意。
在 14 周的研究结束时,第 1 组的 PSS 评分与第 3 组相比有统计学意义的改善(p<0.01)。在其他疗效结果方面也有统计学意义的改善,如 POMS 总情绪干扰、TICS 工作过载和社会责任子量表、STAI 以及 SMS 问卷评估的夜间觉醒次数(p<0.05)。第 1 组的自我报告方案疗效也显著更高(p<0.001)。
尽管存在研究限制,包括第 3 组的压力减轻,本研究表明,这种综合压力管理方案在降低中高压力水平女性的压力方面是有效的。