Costill D L, Thomas R, Robergs R A, Pascoe D, Lambert C, Barr S, Fink W J
Human Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Mar;23(3):371-7.
In an effort to assess the contributions of a period of increased training volume on swimming performance, two matched groups of collegiate male swimmers were studied before and during 25 wk of training. For the first 4 wk of this study, the two groups trained together in one session per day for approximately 1.5 h.d-1. During the following 6 wk (weeks 5-11), one group (LONG) trained two sessions per day, 1.5 h in the morning and 1.5 h in the afternoon. The other group (SHORT) continued to train once each day, in the afternoon with the LONG group. Over the final 14 wk of the study, both groups trained together in one session per day (1.5 h.d-1). Although the swimmers experienced significant improvements in swimming power, endurance, and performance throughout the 25 wk study, there were no differences between the groups. However, during the 6 wk period of increased training, the LONG group experienced a decline in sprinting velocity, whereas the SHORT group showed a significant increase in sprinting performance. The test results suggest that a 6 wk period of two 1.5 h training sessions per day does not enhance performance above that experienced with a single training session of 1.5 h each day. It was also noted that both groups showed little change in swimming endurance and power after the first 8 wk of training, though their performances improved significantly after each taper period.
为了评估增加训练量的一段时间对游泳成绩的贡献,在25周的训练前后,对两组匹配的大学男子游泳运动员进行了研究。在本研究的前4周,两组运动员每天一起训练一次,时长约为1.5小时/天。在接下来的6周(第5 - 11周),一组(长训组)每天训练两次,上午1.5小时,下午1.5小时。另一组(短训组)继续每天训练一次,与长训组在下午一起训练。在研究的最后14周,两组一起每天训练一次(1.5小时/天)。尽管在整个25周的研究中,游泳运动员在游泳力量、耐力和成绩方面都有显著提高,但两组之间没有差异。然而,在训练量增加的6周期间,长训组的冲刺速度下降,而短训组的冲刺成绩显著提高。测试结果表明,每天进行两次1.5小时训练的6周时间,并不能比每天进行一次1.5小时训练提高更多成绩。还注意到,在训练的前8周后,两组的游泳耐力和力量变化不大,尽管在每次减量期后他们的成绩都有显著提高。