Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital, NO-3710 Skien, Norway.
Gut. 2010 Mar;59(3):407-14. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.192948.
In the recent 1-2 decades, we have seen a considerable development in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities and programme implementation, but major challenges remain. While CRC is still the second leading cause of cancer death in both the USA and Europe, there are limited data on the efficacy and effectiveness of all screening modalities except for the faecal occult blood test (FOBT). Newer screening tests, such as faecal immunochemical tests, molecular markers and CT colonography are being introduced and variably adopted, though overall rates of screening are suboptimal. Professional societies and governmental bodies have endorsed screening, though recommended approaches are quite variable, which may help to explain the great variation in screening practices. Unfortunately, quality assurance programmes are underutilised. Comparing the USA and Europe there may be more variation in CRC screening recommendation and practice within each continent than between them, but there seems to be a stronger emphasis on programmatic screening in Europe, facilitating quality assurance. The much debated need for randomised trials as new screening modalities emerge could be more easily handled if running screening programmes are regarded as natural platforms for testing out and evaluating presumed improvements in the service--including new emerging screening modalities.
在最近的 1-2 十年中,我们看到了结直肠癌(CRC)筛查方法和项目实施方面的重大发展,但仍存在重大挑战。虽然 CRC 仍然是美国和欧洲癌症死亡的第二大主要原因,但除了粪便潜血试验(FOBT)之外,所有筛查方法的疗效和效果数据都很有限。新型筛查测试,如粪便免疫化学测试、分子标志物和 CT 结肠成像,正在被引入和不同程度地采用,尽管总体筛查率并不理想。专业协会和政府机构都支持筛查,尽管推荐的方法差异很大,这可能有助于解释筛查实践的巨大差异。不幸的是,质量保证计划的使用不足。比较美国和欧洲,每个大陆内部 CRC 筛查建议和实践的差异可能比它们之间的差异更大,但在欧洲似乎更加强调计划性筛查,从而促进质量保证。随着新的筛查方法的出现,对于随机试验的必要性的争论,如果将运行筛查计划视为测试和评估服务中假定改进的自然平台(包括新出现的筛查方法),可能会更容易处理。