Duffey Kiyah J, Gordon-Larsen Penny, Shikany James M, Guilkey David, Jacobs David R, Popkin Barry M
Department of Nutrition, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27516-3997, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):420-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.545.
Despite surging interest in taxation as a policy to address poor food choice, US research directly examining the association of food prices with individual intake is scarce.
This 20-year longitudinal study included 12 123 respondent days from 5115 participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Associations between food price, dietary intake, overall energy intake, weight, and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were assessed using conditional log-log and linear regression models.
The real price (inflated to 2006 US dollars) of soda and pizza decreased over time; the price of whole milk increased. A 10% increase in the price of soda or pizza was associated with a -7.12% (95% confidence interval [CI], -63.50 to -10.71) or -11.5% (95% CI, -17.50 to -5.50) change in energy from these foods, respectively. A $1.00 increase in soda price was also associated with lower daily energy intake (-124 [95% CI, -198 to -50] kcal), lower weight (-1.05 [95% CI, -1.80 to -0.31] kg), and lower HOMA-IR score (0.42 [95% CI, -0.60 to -0.23]); similar trends were observed for pizza. A $1.00 increase in the price of both soda and pizza was associated with greater changes in total energy intake (-181.49 [95% CI, -247.79 to -115.18] kcal), body weight (-1.65 [95% CI, -2.34 to 0.96] kg), and HOMA-IR (-0.45 [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.31]).
Policies aimed at altering the price of soda or away-from-home pizza may be effective mechanisms to steer US adults toward a more healthful diet and help reduce long-term weight gain or insulin levels over time.
尽管将税收作为解决不良食物选择问题的一项政策引发了人们越来越浓厚的兴趣,但美国直接研究食品价格与个人摄入量之间关联的研究却很匮乏。
这项为期20年的纵向研究纳入了来自青年动脉粥样硬化风险发展研究(CARDIA研究)中5115名参与者的12123个应答日的数据。使用条件对数-对数模型和线性回归模型评估食品价格、饮食摄入量、总体能量摄入量、体重以及稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)评分之间的关联。
苏打水和披萨的实际价格(折算为2006年美元)随时间下降;全脂牛奶价格上涨。苏打水或披萨价格上涨10%分别与这些食物的能量摄入量变化-7.12%(95%置信区间[CI],-63.50至-10.71)或-11.5%(95%CI,-17.50至-5.50)相关。苏打水价格每上涨1美元还与每日能量摄入量降低(-124[95%CI,-198至-50]千卡)、体重降低(-1.05[95%CI,-1.80至-0.31]千克)以及HOMA-IR评分降低(0.42[95%CI,-0.60至-0.23])相关;披萨也观察到类似趋势。苏打水和披萨价格均上涨1美元与总能量摄入量(-181.49[95%CI,-247.79至-115.18]千卡)、体重(-1.65[95%CI,-2.34至-0.96]千克)和HOMA-IR(-0.45[95%CI,-0.59至-0.31])的更大变化相关。
旨在改变苏打水或外出购买披萨价格的政策可能是引导美国成年人养成更健康饮食并随着时间推移帮助减少长期体重增加或胰岛素水平的有效机制。