Alanezi Amer Z, Jiang Jin, Safavi Kamran E, Spangberg Larz S W, Zhu Qiang
Division of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e122-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.028.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of EndoSequence Root Repair Material (Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) and compare it with gray and white MTA.
Samples of 2 mg freshly mixed or set gray MTA (GMTA), white MTA (WMTA), EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM), and AH26 were eluted with 300, 600, and 1,000 microL cell culture medium for 24 and 72 hours. L929 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 3 x 10(4) cells/well and incubated with 100 microL elute from each elute group. Cells cultured only with culture medium served as negative control. AH26 was used as positive control. After 24 hours' incubation, cell cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT assay. Cell viability was calculated as percentage of the control group. The results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance.
For both set and fresh samples, there were no significant cell viability differences among GMTA, WMTA, and ERRM. Cell viability in the AH26 group was less than in all of the other 3 materials.
This study suggests that ERRM may have cell viability similar to GMTA and WMTA in both set and fresh conditions.
本研究旨在评估EndoSequence根充修复材料(美国Brasseler公司,佐治亚州萨凡纳)的细胞毒性,并将其与灰色和白色的矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)进行比较。
将2毫克新鲜混合或凝固的灰色MTA(GMTA)、白色MTA(WMTA)、EndoSequence根充修复材料(ERRM)和AH26的样本分别用300、600和1000微升细胞培养基洗脱24小时和72小时。将L929细胞以3×10⁴个细胞/孔接种到96孔板中,并与每个洗脱组的100微升洗脱液一起孵育。仅用培养基培养的细胞作为阴性对照。AH26用作阳性对照。孵育24小时后,通过MTT法评估细胞毒性。细胞活力以对照组的百分比计算。结果采用单因素方差分析进行分析。
对于凝固和新鲜样本,GMTA、WMTA和ERRM之间的细胞活力没有显著差异。AH26组的细胞活力低于其他所有三种材料。
本研究表明,在凝固和新鲜状态下,ERRM的细胞活力可能与GMTA和WMTA相似。