• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Gutta Flow和Endo Sequence BC封闭剂的细胞毒性评估。

Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers.

作者信息

Zoufan Keivan, Jiang Jin, Komabayashi Takashi, Wang Yu-Hsiung, Safavi Kamran E, Zhu Qiang

机构信息

Division of Endodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-1715, USA.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Nov;112(5):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.050. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.050
PMID:21778087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow and EndoSequence BC sealers and compared them with AH Plus and Tubli-Seal sealers.

STUDY DESIGN

Samples (0.5 mg) of freshly mixed or set BC, GuttaFlow, AH Plus, and Tubli-Seal sealers were eluted with 300, 600, and 1,000 μL cell culture medium for 24 and 72 hours. L929 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 3 × 10(4) cells/well and cultured with 100 μL eluate from each eluate group. Cells cultured only with culture medium served as control. After 24 hours' incubation, the cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT assay. Cell viability was calculated as the percentage of the control group, and the results were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

For the freshly mixed sealer, cell viability in the AH Plus group was less than in all of the other 3 sealer groups. The Tubli-Seal sealer group had less cell viability than the EndoSequence BC and GuttaFlow sealer groups. For the set sealer, the Tubli-Seal and AH Plus groups had less cell viability than the EndoSequence BC and GuttaFlow sealer groups. There was no cell viability difference between the EndoSequence BC and GuttaFlow sealer groups in the either freshly mixed or set sealer group.

CONCLUSIONS

The GuttaFlow and EndoSequence BC sealers have lower cytotoxicity than the AH Plus and Tubli-Seal sealers.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了GuttaFlow和EndoSequence BC封闭剂的细胞毒性,并将它们与AH Plus和Tubli-Seal封闭剂进行比较。

研究设计

将新鲜混合或凝固后的BC、GuttaFlow、AH Plus和Tubli-Seal封闭剂的样品(0.5毫克)分别用300、600和1000微升细胞培养基洗脱24小时和72小时。将L929细胞以3×10⁴个细胞/孔接种到96孔板中,并用来自每个洗脱组的100微升洗脱液进行培养。仅用培养基培养的细胞作为对照。孵育24小时后,通过MTT法评估细胞毒性。细胞活力以对照组的百分比计算,并采用单因素方差分析对结果进行分析。

结果

对于新鲜混合的封闭剂,AH Plus组的细胞活力低于其他3种封闭剂组。Tubli-Seal封闭剂组的细胞活力低于EndoSequence BC和GuttaFlow封闭剂组。对于凝固后的封闭剂,Tubli-Seal和AH Plus组的细胞活力低于EndoSequence BC和GuttaFlow封闭剂组。在新鲜混合或凝固后的封闭剂组中,EndoSequence BC和GuttaFlow封闭剂组之间的细胞活力没有差异。

结论

GuttaFlow和EndoSequence BC封闭剂的细胞毒性低于AH Plus和Tubli-Seal封闭剂。

相似文献

1
Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers.Gutta Flow和Endo Sequence BC封闭剂的细胞毒性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Nov;112(5):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.050. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
Cytotoxicity evaluation of Activ GP and Resilon sealers in vitro.Activ GP和Resilon封闭剂的体外细胞毒性评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jun;107(6):e74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.041.
3
Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers.5种根管封闭剂的物理性能
J Endod. 2013 Oct;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
4
In vitro cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-containing endodontic sealers.含硅酸钙的根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Cytotoxicity evaluation of endosequence root repair material.Endosequence根修复材料的细胞毒性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e122-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.028.
6
In vitro cytotoxicity of guttaflow 2 on human gingival fibroblasts.Guttaflow 2对人牙龈成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1156-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
7
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer.预混生物陶瓷根管封闭剂性能的设置及细胞毒性评价。
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers on Cultured Human Periodontal Fibroblasts: In vitro Study.根管封闭剂对培养的人牙周膜成纤维细胞细胞毒性的比较评价:体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):847-852.
10
A novel GuttaFlow sealer supports cell survival and attachment.一种新型的GuttaFlow封闭剂可支持细胞存活和附着。
J Endod. 2014 Feb;40(2):231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.029. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological Properties of Bioceramic Sealers on Osteoblastic Cells: A Comparative Study.生物陶瓷封闭剂对成骨细胞的生物学特性:一项对比研究。
Braz Dent J. 2024 Dec 16;35:e246037. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202406037. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of biocompatibility of epoxy resin and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.环氧树脂和生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂的生物相容性比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 2;28(12):673. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06071-w.
3
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.
4
Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
5
Heat-Induced Changes in the Physical Properties of a New Premixed Calcium Silicate-Containing Root Canal Sealer: An In Vitro Study.热诱导含新型预混硅酸钙根管封闭剂物理性能的变化:一项体外研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 12;12(4):106. doi: 10.3390/dj12040106.
6
Synthesis and analyses of injectable fluoridated-bioactive glass hydrogel for dental root canal sealing.用于牙根管密封的可注射含氟生物活性玻璃水凝胶的合成与分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294446. eCollection 2023.
7
comparison of bioceramic putty and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy medicament in primary molars. A 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial.生物陶瓷糊剂与矿物三氧化物凝聚体作为乳磨牙牙髓切断术药物的比较。一项为期12个月的随访随机临床试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Oct 20;19:84. eCollection 2022.
8
A Breakthrough in the Era of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Critical Review.硅酸钙基骨水泥时代的一项突破:批判性综述
Cureus. 2022 Aug 29;14(8):e28562. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28562. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Sealers on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.基于硅酸钙和树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的遗传毒性和细胞毒性比较。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):129-134. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.09326.
10
Role of Nanoparticles in Environmental Remediation: An Insight into Heavy Metal Pollution from Dentistry.纳米颗粒在环境修复中的作用:深入了解牙科领域的重金属污染
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2022 Mar 17;2022:1946724. doi: 10.1155/2022/1946724. eCollection 2022.