Nevins Myron, Nevins Marc L, Camelo Marcelo, Camelo Joao Marcelo Borges, Schupbach Peter, Kim David M
Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Apr;30(2):151-61.
This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and feasibility of an extracellular matrix membrane (DynaMatrix) with that of an autogenous gingival graft in increasing the width of attached keratinized tissue. Six patients with an inadequate amount of attached keratinized gingiva on the bilateral facial aspect of the mandibular posterior teeth were recruited for this study. The defect sites were randomly subjected to receive either test (DynaMatrix membrane) or control (autogenous gingival graft) treatment. Both test and control sites achieved a clinically significant increase in the amount of keratinized gingiva, and the DynaMatrix membrane-treated sites blended well with the surrounding tissue, with a better appearance when compared to the autogenous gingival grafted sites. The biopsy specimens of both test and control sites appeared to be similar histologically, with mature connective tissue covered by keratinized epithelium. The results of both clinical and histologic evaluations have suggested a potential application of an extracellular matrix membrane in achieving gingival augmentation.
本研究旨在比较细胞外基质膜(DynaMatrix)与自体牙龈移植术在增加附着角化组织宽度方面的疗效和可行性。本研究招募了6名下颌后牙双侧面部附着角化牙龈量不足的患者。缺损部位随机接受试验(DynaMatrix膜)或对照(自体牙龈移植)治疗。试验组和对照组角化牙龈量均实现了临床上显著的增加,且DynaMatrix膜治疗部位与周围组织融合良好,与自体牙龈移植部位相比外观更佳。试验组和对照组的活检标本在组织学上似乎相似,均有角化上皮覆盖的成熟结缔组织。临床和组织学评估结果均表明细胞外基质膜在实现牙龈增量方面具有潜在应用价值。