Department of Pediatrics, Bioethics Division, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Feb 23;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S6.
Despite the substantial global burden of preterm and stillbirth, little attention has been given to the ethical considerations related to research and interventions in the global context. Ethical dilemmas surrounding reproductive decisions and the care of preterm newborns impact the delivery of interventions, and are not well understood in low-resource settings. Issues such as how to address the moral and cultural attitudes surrounding stillbirths, have cross-cutting implications for global visibility of the disease burden. This analysis identifies ethical issues impacting definitions, discovery, development, and delivery of effective interventions to decrease the global burden of preterm birth and stillbirth.
This review is based on a comprehensive literature review; an ethical analysis of other articles within this global report; and discussions with GAPPS's Scientific Advisory Council, team of international investigators, and a community of international experts on maternal, newborn, and child health and bioethics from the 2009 International Conference on Prematurity and Stillbirth. The literature review includes articles in PubMed, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), and Philosopher's Index with a range of 1995-2008.
Advancements in discovery science relating to preterm birth and stillbirth require careful consideration in the design and use of repositories containing maternal specimens and data. Equally important is the need to improve clinical translation from basic science research to delivery of interventions, and to ensure global needs inform discovery science agenda-setting. Ethical issues in the development of interventions include a need to balance immediate versus long-term impacts--such as caring for preterm newborns rather than preventing preterm births. The delivery of interventions must address: women's health disparities as determinants of preterm birth and stillbirth; improving measurements of impact on equity in coverage; balancing maternal and newborn outcomes in choosing interventions; and understanding the personal and cross-cultural experiences of preterm birth and stillbirth among women, families and communities.
Efforts to improve visibility, funding, research and the successful delivery of interventions for preterm birth and stillbirth face a number of ethical concerns. Thoughtful input from those in health policy, bioethics and international research ethics helped shape an interdisciplinary global action agenda to prevent preterm birth and stillbirth.
尽管早产和死产给全球带来了沉重负担,但人们对全球背景下与研究和干预相关的伦理问题关注甚少。与生殖决策和早产儿护理相关的伦理困境影响了干预措施的实施,而在资源匮乏的环境中,这些问题还没有得到很好的理解。如何解决与死产相关的道德和文化态度等问题,对疾病负担的全球可见度具有跨领域的影响。本分析确定了影响定义、发现、发展和实施有效干预措施以降低全球早产和死产负担的伦理问题。
本综述基于全面的文献综述;对本全球报告中其他文章的伦理分析;以及与 GAPPS 科学咨询委员会、国际调查人员团队以及来自 2009 年早产和死产国际会议的孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康与生物伦理学国际专家社区的讨论。文献综述包括 PubMed、Academic Search Complete(EBSCO)和 Philosopher's Index 中的文章,范围为 1995 年至 2008 年。
早产和死产发现科学的进步需要在设计和使用包含产妇标本和数据的存储库时仔细考虑。同样重要的是,需要从基础科学研究向干预措施的临床转化,以确保全球需求为发现科学的议程制定提供信息。干预措施开发中的伦理问题包括需要平衡即时和长期影响,例如照顾早产儿而不是预防早产。干预措施的实施必须解决:作为早产和死产决定因素的妇女健康差异;改善对覆盖范围公平性影响的衡量;在选择干预措施时平衡母婴结局;并理解妇女、家庭和社区中早产和死产的个人和跨文化体验。
提高早产和死产的知名度、资金、研究和成功实施干预措施的努力面临着许多伦理问题。来自卫生政策、生物伦理学和国际研究伦理领域的深思熟虑的意见有助于形成预防早产和死产的跨学科全球行动计划。