• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Who owns your poop?": insights regarding the intersection of human microbiome research and the ELSI aspects of biobanking and related studies.“谁拥有你的粪便?”:人类微生物组研究与生物库和相关研究的 ELSI 方面相交的见解。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Oct 7;4:72. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-72.
2
Navigating social and ethical challenges of biobanking for human microbiome research.应对人类微生物组研究生物样本库的社会和伦理挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 11;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0160-y.
3
Ethical Legal and Social Issues of Biobanking: Past, Present, and Future.生物样本库的伦理、法律和社会问题:过去、现在与未来
Biopreserv Biobank. 2017 Apr;15(2):142-147. doi: 10.1089/bio.2017.0030. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
4
Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?桥接同意:从收费桥到升降桥?
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Oct 4;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-69.
5
Determining the state of guidance on pediatric biobanking for researchers, HRECS, and families: Regulatory mapping of international guidance.确定针对研究人员、人类研究伦理委员会及家庭的儿科生物样本库指导方针状况:国际指导方针的监管映射
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 May;183(5):2477-2490. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05469-8. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
7
What Potential Donors in Research Biobanking Want to Know: A Large Population Study of the Italian Twin Registry.生物样本库研究中潜在捐赠者想了解的内容:对意大利双胞胎登记处的大规模人群研究
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Dec;14(6):456-463. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.0012. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Biobanks for research. Ethical and legal aspects in human biological samples collections in France.用于研究的生物样本库。法国人体生物样本采集的伦理和法律问题。
J Int Bioethique. 2012 Jun;23(2):165-72, 183-4. doi: 10.3917/jib.232.0165.
9
Ethically sustainable governance in the biobanking of eggs and embryos for research.用于研究的卵子和胚胎生物样本库中的伦理可持续治理。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Dec;33(4):277-94. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0047-6.
10
Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsors' fears.商业组织库:《健康保险流通与责任法案》引发赞助商担忧。
IRB. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):9-11.

引用本文的文献

1
How participation in deliberative engagement affects awareness of, and attitudes towards, genomics research and data sharing: evidence from rural Ghana.参与协商性参与如何影响对基因组学研究和数据共享的认识及态度:来自加纳农村的证据。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01251-z.
2
Microbiome Geographic Population Structure (mGPS) Detects Fine-Scale Geography.微生物组地理种群结构(mGPS)可检测到细微的地理尺度。
Genome Biol Evol. 2024 Nov 1;16(11). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evae209.
3
Donors' experiences and attitudes of fecal microbiota transplantation: An empirical bioethics study from China.粪便微生物群移植捐赠者的经历与态度:一项来自中国的实证性生物伦理学研究。
Imeta. 2022 Nov 21;1(4):e62. doi: 10.1002/imt2.62. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Harnessing the Microbiome: A Comprehensive Review on Advancing Therapeutic Strategies for Rheumatic Diseases.利用微生物群:关于推进风湿病治疗策略的综合综述
Cureus. 2023 Dec 22;15(12):e50964. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50964. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
An ethical code for collecting, using and transferring sensitive health data: outcomes of a modified Policy Delphi process in Singapore.采集、使用和转移敏感健康数据的伦理准则:新加坡经改良的政策德尔菲流程的结果。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 4;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00952-7.
6
Advances and Trends in Omics Technology Development.组学技术发展的进展与趋势
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 1;9:911861. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.911861. eCollection 2022.
7
A comprehensive approach to stool donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantation in China.中国粪便微生物群移植中粪便供体筛查的综合方法。
Microb Cell Fact. 2021 Nov 27;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01705-0.
8
Introducing the Microbes and Social Equity Working Group: Considering the Microbial Components of Social, Environmental, and Health Justice.介绍微生物与社会公平工作组:考量社会、环境与健康公平中的微生物要素。
mSystems. 2021 Aug 31;6(4):e0047121. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00471-21. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.马来西亚生物样本库研究的现状与未来挑战
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Mar 31;13(3):297-315. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00171-5. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
The impact of cross-kingdom molecular forensics on genetic privacy.跨界分子法医鉴定对遗传隐私的影响。
Microbiome. 2021 May 20;9(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01076-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.不列颠哥伦比亚省的生物样本库:通过公众参与协商讨论个性化医疗的未来。
Per Med. 2008 May;5(3):285-296. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285.
2
From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.从同意到机构:为基因组生物库设计适应性治理。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(3):367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.046. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
3
Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome.人类肠道微生物组的肠型。
Nature. 2011 May 12;473(7346):174-80. doi: 10.1038/nature09944. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
4
Extending the reach of public health genomics: what should be the agenda for public health in an era of genome-based and “personalized” medicine?拓展公共卫生基因组学的应用范围:在基于基因组和“个体化”医学的时代,公共卫生应关注哪些议题?
Genet Med. 2010 Dec;12(12):785-91. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182011222.
5
Should the human microbiome be considered when developing vaccines?在研发疫苗时是否应考虑人类微生物组?
PLoS Pathog. 2010 Nov 18;6(11):e1001190. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001190.
6
Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium.应对电子病历与基因组学(eMERGE)联盟中的实时伦理、法律和社会问题。
Genet Med. 2010 Oct;12(10):616-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181efdbd0.
7
Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors.生物样本库:对遗传咨询师的重要性、影响及机遇
J Genet Couns. 2010 Oct;19(5):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9305-1. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
8
Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking.构建公众参与机制,以便在人类组织生物样本库政策制定过程中提供有效投入。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(4):197-206. doi: 10.1159/000279621. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
9
Personal genomes in progress: from the human genome project to the personal genome project.进展中的个人基因组:从人类基因组计划到个人基因组计划。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(1):47-60. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.1/jlunshof.
10
Harnessing the power of the human microbiome.利用人类微生物组的力量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 6;107(14):6125-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002112107. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

“谁拥有你的粪便?”:人类微生物组研究与生物库和相关研究的 ELSI 方面相交的见解。

"Who owns your poop?": insights regarding the intersection of human microbiome research and the ELSI aspects of biobanking and related studies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Oct 7;4:72. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-72.

DOI:10.1186/1755-8794-4-72
PMID:21982589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3199231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the social, ethical, and legal implications of biobanking and large scale data sharing are already complicated enough, they may be further compounded by research on the human microbiome.

DISCUSSION

The human microbiome is the entire complement of microorganisms that exists in and on every human body. Currently most biobanks focus primarily on human tissues and/or associated data (e.g. health records). Accordingly, most discussions in the social sciences and humanities on these issues are focused (appropriately so) on the implications of biobanks and sharing data derived from human tissues. However, rapid advances in human microbiome research involve collecting large amounts of data on microorganisms that exist in symbiotic relationships with the human body. Currently it is not clear whether these microorganisms should be considered part of or separate from the human body. Arguments can be made for both, but ultimately it seems that the dichotomy of human versus non-human and self versus non-self inevitably breaks down in this context. This situation has the potential to add further complications to debates on biobanking.

SUMMARY

In this paper, we revisit some of the core problem areas of privacy, consent, ownership, return of results, governance, and benefit sharing, and consider how they might be impacted upon by human microbiome research. Some of the issues discussed also have relevance to other forms of microbial research. Discussion of these themes is guided by conceptual analysis of microbiome research and interviews with leading Canadian scientists in the field.

摘要

背景

生物库和大规模数据共享的社会、伦理和法律影响已经足够复杂,而人类微生物组的研究可能会使情况进一步复杂化。

讨论

人类微生物组是指存在于每个人体内部和表面的所有微生物。目前,大多数生物库主要关注人体组织和/或相关数据(例如健康记录)。因此,社会科学和人文学科中关于这些问题的大多数讨论(适当地)都集中在生物库的影响以及与人体组织相关的数据共享上。然而,人类微生物组研究的快速进展涉及到大量与人体共生的微生物数据的收集。目前尚不清楚这些微生物是否应被视为人体的一部分或独立于人体。这两种观点都有其道理,但最终看来,在这种情况下,人类与非人类、自我与非自我之间的二分法不可避免地会崩溃。这种情况有可能给生物库的辩论增加进一步的复杂性。

总结

本文重新审视了隐私、同意、所有权、结果回报、治理和利益分享等一些核心问题领域,并考虑了它们可能会受到人类微生物组研究的影响。所讨论的一些问题也与其他形式的微生物研究有关。本文通过对微生物组研究的概念分析和对该领域加拿大领先科学家的访谈,对这些主题进行了讨论。