Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Grini næringpark 13, 1332, Østerås, Norway.
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):653-67. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1413-8. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
Significant shifts in opinion regarding environmental protection from ionising radiation have resulted in the development and availability of bespoke approaches for the assessment of impacts on wildlife from radioactive contaminants. The application of such assessment methodologies to actual situations, however, remains relatively limited. This paper describes the implementation of the ERICA Integrated Approach and associated tools within the context of routine discharges of radioactive materials to a freshwater environment. The article follows the implementation through its relevant stages and discusses strengths and weaknesses of the approach in relation to the case study. For current discharge levels, 137Cs and 60Co constitute the main dose contributors to the majority of reference organisms studied, although 241Am and 3H are the main contributors for the phyto- and zooplankton categories. Patterns are observed depending on whether the reference organism is sediment-associated or not. At current discharge levels, none of the reference organisms exceeded or approached the selected screening level, and impacts on biota could be regarded as negligible.
关于电离辐射环境保护的观点发生了重大转变,因此开发并提供了专门的方法来评估放射性污染物对野生动物的影响。然而,此类评估方法在实际情况中的应用仍然相对有限。本文描述了在将 ERICA 综合方法和相关工具应用于放射性物质向淡水环境的例行排放的情况。本文通过相关阶段来追踪实施情况,并讨论该方法在案例研究中的优缺点。对于当前的排放水平,137Cs 和 60Co 是大多数受研究的参考生物的主要剂量贡献者,尽管 241Am 和 3H 是浮游植物和浮游动物类别的主要贡献者。根据参考生物是否与沉积物有关,可以观察到各种模式。在当前的排放水平下,没有一种参考生物超过或接近所选的筛选水平,对生物群的影响可以认为是微不足道的。