Department of Sport Sciences, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Int J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;31(6):421-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248286. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
The present study investigated the Accumulated Oxygen Deficit (AOD) method in front crawl swimming with the aims to assess the robustness of the oxygen uptake/swimming velocity regression line and to quantify the precision of the AOD. Twenty-nine male swimmers performed two swimming tests in different days, with a 24 h recovery between tests: a graded test and an all-out test. The all-out test was performed either in 100 m (n=11), 200 m (n=13) or 400 m (n=5). Through all testing expired gases were collected breath by breath and analysed with a K4b2 Gas Analyser (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) connected to an AquaTrainer Valve (Cosmed, Rome, Italy). The error of oxygen uptake/swimming velocity regression lines was approximately 4-5 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1)) and the regressions allowed an extrapolation of the energy cost to higher intensities with a standard error of prediction of approximately 3-4 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1). However, the data variability was considerable (95% confidence intervals of the linear extrapolation larger than 13 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1)). The AOD imprecision varied among the three distance events from approximately 3-13 ml x kg (-1). These absolute errors are small, considering the time that subjects took to cover the three distances, but relative to the AOD values that were estimated they can be considered high, especially in the 400 m bout.
本研究采用累积氧亏(AOD)方法对自由泳进行研究,旨在评估摄氧量-游速回归线的稳健性,并量化 AOD 的精密度。29 名男性游泳运动员在不同的两天内进行了两次游泳测试,两次测试之间有 24 小时的恢复期:递增测试和全力测试。全力测试分别在 100 米(n=11)、200 米(n=13)或 400 米(n=5)进行。所有测试中,呼吸气体通过呼吸被逐口气收集,并使用 K4b2 气体分析仪(Cosmed,罗马,意大利)与 AquaTrainer 阀(Cosmed,罗马,意大利)连接进行分析。摄氧量-游速回归线的误差约为 4-5 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1)),回归允许以大约 3-4 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1) 的预测标准误差对更高强度的能量消耗进行外推。然而,数据变异性相当大(线性外推的 95%置信区间大于 13 ml x kg (-1) x min (-1))。三个距离项目的 AOD 不精密度从大约 3-13 ml x kg (-1) 不等。考虑到受试者完成三个距离所需的时间,这些绝对误差很小,但相对于估计的 AOD 值,它们可以被认为是高的,尤其是在 400 米回合中。