• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活动兴趣的增减:调节适配的作用。

Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: the role of regulatory fit.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Columbia University, Schermerhorn Hall, New York 10027, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Apr;98(4):559-72. doi: 10.1037/a0018833.

DOI:10.1037/a0018833
PMID:20307129
Abstract

What makes people's interest in doing an activity increase or decrease? Regulatory fit theory (E. T. Higgins, 2000) provides a new perspective on this classic issue by emphasizing the relation between people's activity orientation, such as thinking of an activity as fun, and the manner of activity engagement that the surrounding situation supports. These situational factors include whether a reward for good performance, expected (Study 1) or unexpected (Study 2), is experienced as enjoyable or as serious and whether the free-choice period that measures interest in the activity is experienced as enjoyable or as serious (Study 3). Studies 1-3 found that participants were more likely to do a fun activity again when these situational factors supported a manner of doing the activity that fit the fun orientation-a reward or free-choice period framed as enjoyable. This effect was not because interest in doing an activity again is simply greater in an enjoyable than a serious surrounding situation because it did not occur, and even reversed, when the activity orientation was important rather than fun, where now a serious manner of engagement provides the fit (Study 4a and 4b).

摘要

是什么让人们对某项活动的兴趣增加或减少?调节适配理论(E.T. Higgins,2000)通过强调人们的活动取向(如将活动视为乐趣)与周围环境支持的活动参与方式之间的关系,为这个经典问题提供了一个新的视角。这些情境因素包括,无论奖励是预期的(研究 1)还是意外的(研究 2),是被体验为愉快的还是严肃的,以及衡量对活动的兴趣的自由选择期是被体验为愉快的还是严肃的(研究 3)。研究 1-3 发现,当这些情境因素支持与乐趣取向相符的活动方式(将奖励或自由选择期设定为愉快的方式)时,参与者更有可能再次参与有趣的活动。这种效果并不是因为在愉快的环境中再次参与活动的兴趣比在严肃的环境中更大,因为当活动取向不重要而是乐趣时,这种效果不会出现,甚至会出现相反的情况,此时严肃的参与方式提供了适配(研究 4a 和 4b)。

相似文献

1
Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: the role of regulatory fit.活动兴趣的增减:调节适配的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Apr;98(4):559-72. doi: 10.1037/a0018833.
2
How "fun/importance" fit affects performance: relating implicit theories to instructions.“乐趣/重要性”契合度如何影响表现:将内隐理论与指导联系起来。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;29(9):1091-103. doi: 10.1177/0146167203253481.
3
Making a good decision: value from fit.做出明智决策:适配带来价值。
Am Psychol. 2000 Nov;55(11):1217-30.
4
Maintaining activity engagement: individual differences in the process of self-regulating motivation.保持活动参与度:自我调节动机过程中的个体差异。
J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1697-720. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00425.x.
5
Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.来自调节匹配的道德价值转移:感觉正确的就是正确的,感觉错误的就是错误的。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):498-510.
6
Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us.积极或消极榜样的激励作用:调节焦点决定谁最能激励我们。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Oct;83(4):854-64.
7
Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power.为什么有些群体感觉更好:群体权力的调节适配性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;92(2):249-67. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.249.
8
Dispositional and situational learning goals and children's self-regulation.性格和情境学习目标与儿童的自我调节
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Dec;77(Pt 4):773-86. doi: 10.1348/000709907X196264.
9
School and family effects on the ontogeny of children's interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices.学校和家庭对儿童兴趣、自我认知及活动选择个体发展的影响。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1992;40:145-208.
10
Task interest and actual performance: the moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals.任务兴趣与实际表现:指定目标和自主目标的调节作用
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1006-15. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1006.

引用本文的文献

1
Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments.给和平一个机会?监管焦点如何影响棘手冲突环境中的组织冲突事件。
J Manage. 2025 Feb;51(2):748-780. doi: 10.1177/01492063231196556. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
The Divergent Effects of the Public's Sense of Power on Donation Intention.公众权力感对捐赠意愿的不同影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;13(2):118. doi: 10.3390/bs13020118.
3
Feeling Good Despite EDS: The Effects of a 5-Week Online Positive Psychology Programme for Ehlers-Danlos-Syndromes Patients.
尽管患有埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征,但仍感觉良好:一项为期5周的针对埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征患者的在线积极心理学计划的效果
J Contemp Psychother. 2022;52(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s10879-021-09521-8. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
4
Integrating knowledge across domains to advance the science of health behavior: overcoming challenges and facilitating success.整合跨领域知识以推动健康行为科学发展:克服挑战并促进成功。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Mar;7(1):98-105. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0433-5.
5
Thirst for knowledge: The effects of curiosity and interest on memory in younger and older adults.求知欲:好奇心和兴趣对年轻人和老年人记忆的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):835-41. doi: 10.1037/a0039801. Epub 2015 Oct 19.